Season of the Witch Mafia - Page 2

On September 04 2014 21:25 Oatsmaster wrote:

why sloosh and why isnt this list about scum?

On September 04 2014 21:57 Oatsmaster wrote:

prove the sloosh thing.

On September 04 2014 23:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I also think LM is town.

On September 05 2014 00:45 Oatsmaster wrote:

???

hes saying his reads?

##unvote
##vote Koshi

On September 05 2014 01:28 Oatsmaster wrote:


I voted geript because I felt he was town. I didn't vote myself because I want other people to solve the game.

I did. People who talk about or towards a lot of different people are mostly town. It's a valid D1 tactic. I still believe my list is correct. It's on the people not on my list to proof they are town. That's how I am going to play this day.

See above.

See above²

On September 05 2014 01:58 IAmRobik wrote:


To the untrained eye, this isn't weird at all. But look at it closer.

"I am not surprised geript's reads are the opposite of mine" -- nothing wrong here
but then he puts an ellipsis and a smiley face after that.

I would have been fine with a period and a smiley face. or just a smiley face. but why would he put an ellipsis after a statement like that. It doesn't make sense!

An ellipsis implies that the thought trails off or that you want someone to draw a conclusion or that you're unsure about something and don't want to full commit.

It's just completely out of place.

On September 05 2014 02:13 Oatsmaster wrote:

The tone this whole game is either super serious or fake happy.
Lynch this shit man.


Koshi, show us a town game where you played the same way.

On September 05 2014 03:14 geript wrote:

I've been thinking about this, but can you explain the Oats, Gobbly and Robik reads.

On September 05 2014 04:41 LoneMeow wrote:


Please go check Guilty Mini Mafia - he was town. Would you agree that his play here looks somewhat similar to his early play in that? Does that affect your read on him?

On September 05 2014 04:50 LoneMeow wrote:


Similar in the sense that he doesn't really give much real reasoning in that either. It's a little more verbose than this game, I'll admit that, but at least for me it gives enough doubt that I can not call him scum for the play he's displayed so far.

On September 05 2014 14:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am pretty puzzled because robik's reads are way off. Like they are really off in my opinion. Other than that i think he is town.
ritoky is being dumb as hell.... Many other people are running in circles with no real cases, they just call some people scum and do not make cases or vote properly. I have no fucking idea what Haru is doing.

Koshi help me out here.
Sylencia, gobbeldobbel and Sloosh/Haru. Who's scum there?

On September 04 2014 22:59 HaruRH wrote:
Btw, anyone who townreads me on d1 are scum. Literally all my games came out as such.
Or they are trying to hardpush me.

On September 04 2014 21:06 Sylencia wrote:
Haru is town. Can't explain in too much detail without souping Haru. I am pretty certain I'm seeing the ideal situation and disagree with Koshi's statement about not seeing the big picture.

Null:
yamato - call out with no reasoning. Impossible to say anything about it
damdred - 1 post
rayn - 1 post
lonemeow - not in yet

I'm extremely conflicted about Oats. I hate the fact he called sloosh and koshi scum without any reasoning - and still without explaining why he called it out in the first place. His case against sloosh is pretty paper thin and I disagree with his interpretation of sloosh's posts. My interpretation is that the Oracle, Inquisitor and Wraith do what they think is best in terms of both finding the best time to reveal and expose themselves to soup, and in addition who they target. All of us, including the mentioned roles should (at some point closer to deadline more likely) put in suggestions as to who are the ideal target(s). Obviously we can wait for sloosh to come back to smooth things out a bit, but I feel like Oats is just cherry picking the part that makes sloosh look the worse and ignoring everything around it. Main reason why I'm conflicted is because the way Oats has been playing is classic town Oats and some high percentage of games (I think) end up with Oats being mislynched D1 because of it -_-

IAmRobik - pretty townie, can't see scum seeing the gobble grail vote reasoning before being told about it. I wouldn't ever hammer over this alone, but it's definitely a strike against gobble

Gobble is null-scum - Until I think about it later, something gives me a bad feeling about the initial planning post (regarding Inquis/Oracle visiting the same person) - like it feels like a plan to stifle the information we get from the Inquisitor in order to get Oracle views, which I think is pretty average N1. Then there's the case from Robik which I still think is still decent, but as I said, it's not solid enough evidence.

Scum team prediction so far: 1 of the players who haven't posted more than once or twice, oats and gobble.