EPTI'm torn who to vote for, because you still seem scummy to me viv and 3d does as well.
Mission Mini Mafia - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
I'm torn who to vote for, because you still seem scummy to me viv and 3d does as well. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
All you have done last night/this morning is talk about the kita case, and that we need to pick a lynch target before the 4 people you listed and thats it basically. You do not go back and read what you missed out on or comment on it. There were a few things I think talking about you in their. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 06 2014 23:50 Vivax wrote: What's the point of this conversation? I can't think of anything I could answer with that isn't defending my actions and taking away the steam from your claims, which isn't necessary cause I'm not getting lynched whatever you do. I'm not going to further waste my words if your conversation is going to revolve around me. If you really want to get me lynched talk to the thread and not to me. Bullshit Whats bullshit? I explained what i meant? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
And ever since then i've screamed that 3d is scum, while everyone else screams that he isn't. 3D has ignored every single person in this thread trying to get information from them but he yells at kush? Yeah fuck you viv for misrepresenting | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Lurking=/=stopped fighting back. You are wrong and you should feel bad | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Good job Viv | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
I think your scummy vivax, but 3d ignoring a ton of posts from poof and other people calling him scummy. Hes been doing it all game, with nb, with poof and with me. He has not interacted with the claims that hes scum hes just let people fight for his towniness without actually fighting himself. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 07 2014 00:33 Vivax wrote: Another terrible post. It's scummy looking but Damdred doesn't read it as scummy at all. What's even the point of bringing it up? Like, you see something scummy, it catches your attention, then you post reasons for it being towny. There's no town motivation behind posting something like this. You call out what you find scummy, you don't see something scummy, then look for reasons for why it's townie. Answer us why you found it scummy in the first place if you deliver a town explanation??? You willingly chose to interpret something in a townie way you claimed to have found scummy. Why don't you actually put the post in context to what was going on in the thread instead of just grabbing one out and yelling about it? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 07 2014 00:38 Vivax wrote: Yeah, the context was that batsnacks called it out and you felt compelled to first agree with him then post why you actually think the opposite. Actually no thats not the context at all, I was responding to obi and I said. This looks the most scummy out of everything bats pointed out, BUT NOOOOOOOO. Was my post at the time basically. You are misrepresenting what was happening in the thread and my post | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 07 2014 00:43 Vivax wrote: For some reason you felt that batsnacks had a point but for some reason you decided you had to read kita as town and found a reason that explained it from a town PoV. What was the point of defending kita against it if you felt that what he posted was scummy? You can't call one behaviour both scummy and town in the same post unless you're making up shit. A townie answer would have been to plain and simply disagree with bats, a scummy answer is to first agree with him to kiss his ass and not look like you're disagreeing but then actually posting reasons for why you don't agree. Just because out of three posts that bat posted, one of them I say "Hey guys this is the most scummy thing kita says" doesn't mean that I think its scummy. instead I go and explain in that post why I don't think its scummy AT THAT TIME. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 07 2014 00:55 Vivax wrote: This? So you were finding reasons for batsnacks to scumread kita, found it the best reason, then immediately argued for it being actually something a townie would do? I saw obis question, I reread bats post. It was the only thing that could look scummy at that time in what he listed and I pointed it out and thought why town would struggle with it. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 07 2014 01:03 kushm4sta wrote: he was scum or town? do you think he is capable of that earlygame aggro like he showed in this game as scum? He was scum, he went after me maybe poof to. And then fucked off after he had his vote down for long periods of time. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 07 2014 01:38 Vivax wrote: This is also why you're scum. You were constantly on the fence with bats before, avoiding to give a more decisive opinion on him, always treading between agreeing and being indecisive when poofter questioned you. When obi talks about him, you felt compelled to reply for bats... Why would you do that? Obi wonders what reasons bats has to suspect kita. You feel like chiming in, and find the best reason bats has to display and then disagree with it. WHY? It just doesn't make any fucking sense from a town perspective. Your objective as town would be to find scum, not...Answering for bats, then disagreeing with him and townreading kita, who you recently called scummy for a bunch of other stuff. I said a few times in the thread before that, that I thought bats was scummy. I even had a small little meta case on him, why are you trying to misrepresent what i've done again vivax? I saw something I wanted to post about and give an opinion and I did. And it's called read evolution as the thread goes on reads change as you get more posts on people and you see more patterns and what not. Unlike how you are acting right now, I realize that I can be wrong and my reads can and should change on that. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 07 2014 01:39 kushm4sta wrote: but dont you think it's usually town who comes up with retarded theories like that? Retarded theory aside, which yes town is usuall the ones who come up with that. He still vanishes for long perios of time, especially after people fight pressure for him. Ignores the pressures put on b poof, attacks kush for his non activity when hes guilty of the same. And hopped on that lynch of mic when he said scum lurks and jumps on that. Am i wrong kusH? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 07 2014 01:53 Vivax wrote: Cause at the time most people were on him and I wanted a majority driven wagon before it's 1 h pre-lynch. Which you would know if you read the thread at the time when I voted for him. Between you and him I don't care who goes first. Scum or scum =scum. Oh hey, its good to meet you bats! Wan't it just you who yelled at me for answering for bats? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On September 07 2014 01:58 Vivax wrote: You can't compare that, I answer for bats cause it's about myself and I can explain it better than bats. You answered for bats with something that was about kita. Your whole case that you presented against me is semantics basically. And it always has been | ||
| ||
