|
On September 02 2014 14:03 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 12:12 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 12:06 Vivax wrote:
Have you been physically mistreated by bunnies in the past for bold statements? repeatedly. Cough* Bullshit *Cough Also, Tehpoof couldn't handle this hotness. That being said, yes, you are looking too much into. Apparently troll reaction means you are scum. Don't know why. Could honestly care less if you voted for me. So I just skimmed the thread, but is there anything specific I should look at? Did someone say batsnacks made a terrible post?
So why is tehpoofter "top town" if he is making this horrible case on you, equating trolliness to scuminess?
Follow up question:
Since you two have had a romantic history together, are you good at reading each other?
|
On September 02 2014 17:24 3d12 wrote:
And currently exhibit A on my list is kushm4sta. Despite the awesomely understanding acceptance of my newbie ways, we haven't seen much from him aside from jumping on the batwagon and refuting Vivax -- who, in my opinion, is making the most sense out of anyone in this entire thread, myself included. Exhibit B is Micchan, who seems strangely quiet. I hope he hasn't gone AFK.
So why am I scum?
"jumping on the bandwagon?" not really a bandwagon since there are only two people voting for batsnacks, and I didn't really jump on it cause I was the first vote.
"refuting vivax" Why are my refutations scummy? What has vivax said that makes sense?
|
On September 03 2014 05:38 mderg wrote:
Anyone else thinking that 3d12 is trying hard to get some newbie bonus?
how so
|
|
|
Are peeps still good on lynching batsnacks
|
|
|
oh i care it's just im busy. summer kush is dead.
|
flip in 2 hours confirm/deny?
|
On September 04 2014 02:56 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 04 2014 02:54 kushm4sta wrote:
oh i care it's just im busy. summer kush is dead. Then why are you playjng
as you will find out, I have no problem playing low activity games. I enjoy playing mafia even if I don't have the time to play it to the best of my abilities. People get mad it me but they can smd 
|
kinda skimming everyone's filter right now.
i'm down to vivax and so far i dont have anyone I want to lynch, but I feel like this is in order:
##unvote batsnacks
|
people are way overexplaining their votes for miccan. it's an rng plynch plain and simple.
|
-zero resistance or other wagons to the miccan lynch
-his current posts might be too scummy to be scum
Yes, he could be scum but I don't like this lynch.
|
why batsnacks nb?
i thought his more recent stuff didn't look that scummy.
|
nb but why batsnacks u didn't answer that
|
batsnacks voting for kita seems kind of like a joke/hunch not too serious type thing.
He unvoted templar because he didn't want that vote to count. It was a troll vote.
nb, I find your case unconvincing and I think you are scummy for low snr.
|
signal to noise ratio. it means have a lot of derp and not a lot of content.
|
obi what are the similarities? im not really seeing them.
|
miccan's not a terrible lynch so i wouldn't be too sad if that happens.
from skimming filters damdred/nb look scummy to me. not too solid on that yet.
##vote 27ninjabunnies
|
On September 04 2014 03:56 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On September 04 2014 03:52 kushm4sta wrote:
signal to noise ratio. it means have a lot of derp and not a lot of content. Ouch, shots right there. I thought my posts were pretty good.
what is a post you have made with townie content?
|
On September 03 2014 07:14 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2014 06:48 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 03 2014 06:42 batsnacks wrote:On September 03 2014 06:39 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 03 2014 06:35 mderg wrote:On September 03 2014 06:22 kushm4sta wrote:On September 03 2014 05:38 mderg wrote:
Anyone else thinking that 3d12 is trying hard to get some newbie bonus? how so These give off that feeling to me. I may be thinking too much into it, though. On September 02 2014 08:44 3d12 wrote:
Forgive me if this seems like kind of a newbie question, but after catching up on the thread, the main thing that sticks out to me is the discussion about the voting. I'm not sure this is a good way to flush out scum. Personally, I'm with Damdred on the opinion that cutting the vote off early will cause tunneling on whoever has the majority at that point, so could someone enlighten me further on why this strategy would help? On September 02 2014 09:09 3d12 wrote:Edit-post to fix quote formatting: On September 02 2014 08:08 The_Templar wrote:
And the missions are required for mafia… or they will die. I would say that's better for us anyway.
I didn't quote the post directly. Sorry. On September 03 2014 01:04 3d12 wrote:
You're right, I thought I saw a third vote for batsnacks. Sorry. I wish there was a neater way to find the current vote count. Is there a program or something that I could use to loop through the thread and count the votes?
I think thats a stretch I don't think I'd give him townie points for any of these posts as even as a noob you could say them from either alignment. I think its is townie of you to point it out like it seems as if you're looking for scum. Would you agree that 3d12's posts carry an apologetic tone? If yes, why do you think he is posting this way? I do think that he is apologetic in nature on his posts. His entrance landed him in the scummy side for me because of the way it agreed with someone who already posted about something I thought was scummy. If hes scum its to try to scoot out of a lynch. He could be town trying to figure things out. He stays as scum for now to me thought. What about you? I agree that his tone sounds apologetic but I do not think in his case that this is alignment indicative. Reading his filter, I noticed he has been posting like this since before the game even began. Here are some posts before the game started: Show nested quote +On August 30 2014 00:51 3d12 wrote:
/in
I've never played, so if you're alright with a newbie joining in, then please do sign me up. I've read a few of the guides already though, and it seems like an interesting format. Seems like the type of game that might even be more fun in IRC format. Show nested quote +On August 30 2014 05:50 3d12 wrote:
Sorry for the double-post, but I just wanted to double-check. (And bear with me, this is only the first of what will likely be a deluge of dumb newbie questions)
Is the deadline of 12:30pm PDT the deadline for confirmation, or the deadline to post each day? Then this is his first post as of the game starting: Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 08:44 3d12 wrote:
Forgive me if this seems like kind of a newbie question, but after catching up on the thread, the main thing that sticks out to me is the discussion about the voting. I'm not sure this is a good way to flush out scum. Personally, I'm with Damdred on the opinion that cutting the vote off early will cause tunneling on whoever has the majority at that point, so could someone enlighten me further on why this strategy would help? An apologetic tone would usually raise alarm bells for me. Townies are inherently innocent and shouldn't be afraid of saying the wrong thing or accidentally saying too much; they have no reason to apologize. If townies are afraid of speaking their mind that might be an indicator of a poor thread environment. However, since 3d12 has been posting like this since before the game began I believe he's just nervous about playing in general. People have been going after him since his first post so there hasn't even been an opportunity for him to calm down yet. Overall I do not think 3d12's apologies are scummy.
i think this post makes sense. I don't know why people are saying batsnacks is being weird about the apologetic tone. Could be scum defending scum maybe? But it doesn't look like a post scumbatsnacks would make otherwise, just because he has to go so out of his way to find that evidence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
