|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 05 2014 23:44 Vivax wrote: I'm just going to say this: I'm going to do my thing in the next hours, but if you think I'm scum then you've either become bad at this game or scum. Neither is true and you very well know it.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I just think Haru's read on gobble is totally disingenuous. gobbledy is the opposite of waffly in almost his whole filter and Haru picks out one post where he says he's null on someone and retracts a scumread?
Outside of this post he confidently declares Artanis mafia, same with Poofter, makes a case on Haru. gobbledy isn't the least bit indecisive and waffly. I don't understand the misrepresentation.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:00 Vivax wrote: Marv is dumb and probably only chose me cause I still have the policy vote on him, ignore whatever stupid shit he says. I'm not dumb and I was pretty clear why I chose you. Get a grip.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:02 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 00:00 Vivax wrote: Marv is dumb and probably only chose me cause I still have the policy vote on him, ignore whatever stupid shit he says. Besides, he didn't really say anything, he only put it out there that I could be scum and then started reinforcing people's opinions without adding much of his own. In fact, I was the first to say:
On August 05 2014 18:44 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2014 18:39 Eden1892 wrote: : (
ooo why vivax i forget what i thought about him so he's back to indifferent for me This is almost precisely it. I can't really remember anything Vivax has said beyond rambling for a long time about this that and the other. His posts don't seem to have any impetus or direction; I don't know what he's trying to achieve or where he's trying to push town. He just "exists" in this thread and I don't know why. So ...yeah
keep bullshitting, Vivax. Just try it on me.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
How does it feel to be caught in a lie, Vivax?
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:20 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 00:18 justanothertownie wrote:On August 06 2014 00:15 HaruRH wrote: Amyway I got 10 minutes to answer any questions before I head off for bed. Ama. Did you ever give an answer as to why gobble is scum for having the same scumreads you have? This is such a glaring contradiction. Yes I did. I mentioned it was a coincidence for us to have the same scumreads. The method of getting these scumread was what I am critical about. The period of 'mehness' in between was also what I noticed the mostm IT WAS ONE POST OH MY GOD
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
also what was wrong with the method??
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote: He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread. This is what I dislike the most. You are calling him scum for scumreading your scumreads. Scumreadception. but it's the method, don't you see?
No?
Me neither.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:27 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote: He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread. This is what I dislike the most. You are calling him scum for scumreading your scumreads. Scumreadception. I dont like how he hopped from artanis to pooft the moment he saw stuff from artanis. Doesn't feel like a pressure vote either. More like moving away from the responsibility of actually having to converse with his own scumread. But it's precisely what you're advocating - if someone produces content then that's good, if they don;t produce concent then you are going to scumread them
so it makes perfect sense when artanis produces content that gobbledy would think to unvote him, given his case on him to begin with was that he had a 3 page filter with no content........
............
................................................
nothing you say makes any sense at all, ever.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:33 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 00:30 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:27 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote: He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread. This is what I dislike the most. You are calling him scum for scumreading your scumreads. Scumreadception. I dont like how he hopped from artanis to pooft the moment he saw stuff from artanis. Doesn't feel like a pressure vote either. More like moving away from the responsibility of actually having to converse with his own scumread. But it's precisely what you're advocating - if someone produces content then that's good, if they don;t produce concent then you are going to scumread them so it makes perfect sense when artanis produces content that gobbledy would think to unvote him, given his case on him to begin with was that he had a 3 page filter with no content........ ............ ................................................ nothing you say makes any sense at all, ever. ............... I'm blind. I did not see that until you pointed it out. .......................... Buuuuuut my point on artanis still stands. He have weird reads. 'Reason no.100 why haru dont do list posts early on because he usually make these lame ass mistakes that he only find out later or until someone shows it to him explicitly' So are you retracting on gobbledy? Would you rather kill Scumtanis?
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:37 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 00:34 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:33 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:30 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:27 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote: He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread. This is what I dislike the most. You are calling him scum for scumreading your scumreads. Scumreadception. I dont like how he hopped from artanis to pooft the moment he saw stuff from artanis. Doesn't feel like a pressure vote either. More like moving away from the responsibility of actually having to converse with his own scumread. But it's precisely what you're advocating - if someone produces content then that's good, if they don;t produce concent then you are going to scumread them so it makes perfect sense when artanis produces content that gobbledy would think to unvote him, given his case on him to begin with was that he had a 3 page filter with no content........ ............ ................................................ nothing you say makes any sense at all, ever. ............... I'm blind. I did not see that until you pointed it out. .......................... Buuuuuut my point on artanis still stands. He have weird reads. 'Reason no.100 why haru dont do list posts early on because he usually make these lame ass mistakes that he only find out later or until someone shows it to him explicitly' So are you retracting on gobbledy? Would you rather kill Scumtanis? Im retracting halfly on gobble due to how I still have beef with his eagerness to switch, like what vivax pointed out. Scumtanis still have weird meta reads that he isn't explaining. Mostly telling me why he thought that way, not telling me what was the purpose. Except at first he wasn't happy with Artanis' posts:
On August 04 2014 21:12 gobbledydook wrote: Ten one-line useless posts from Artanis later...
nope, not convinced
only later was he happier
On August 05 2014 13:12 gobbledydook wrote: Artanis finally showed up and did something useful. Poofter hasn't. All he really has done is scumread on the timing of marv's vote and then say he can't read him anyway. It's such a useless, trivial point that occupies lots of space.
##vote: tehpoofter
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:39 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 00:38 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:37 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:34 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:33 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:30 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:27 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote: He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread. This is what I dislike the most. You are calling him scum for scumreading your scumreads. Scumreadception. I dont like how he hopped from artanis to pooft the moment he saw stuff from artanis. Doesn't feel like a pressure vote either. More like moving away from the responsibility of actually having to converse with his own scumread. But it's precisely what you're advocating - if someone produces content then that's good, if they don;t produce concent then you are going to scumread them so it makes perfect sense when artanis produces content that gobbledy would think to unvote him, given his case on him to begin with was that he had a 3 page filter with no content........ ............ ................................................ nothing you say makes any sense at all, ever. ............... I'm blind. I did not see that until you pointed it out. .......................... Buuuuuut my point on artanis still stands. He have weird reads. 'Reason no.100 why haru dont do list posts early on because he usually make these lame ass mistakes that he only find out later or until someone shows it to him explicitly' So are you retracting on gobbledy? Would you rather kill Scumtanis? Im retracting halfly on gobble due to how I still have beef with his eagerness to switch, like what vivax pointed out. Scumtanis still have weird meta reads that he isn't explaining. Mostly telling me why he thought that way, not telling me what was the purpose. Except at first he wasn't happy with Artanis' posts: On August 04 2014 21:12 gobbledydook wrote: Ten one-line useless posts from Artanis later...
nope, not convinced
only later was he happier On August 05 2014 13:12 gobbledydook wrote: Artanis finally showed up and did something useful. Poofter hasn't. All he really has done is scumread on the timing of marv's vote and then say he can't read him anyway. It's such a useless, trivial point that occupies lots of space.
##vote: tehpoofter I can almost hear gobble whispering 'please post something useful artanis please post please please' 'YES YOU DID IT YOURE TOWN' no you can't
you're literally just making that up to fit a narrative.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
like i said, you're literally making shit up to fit your invented narrative.
it's just complete trash.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I could kill Haru or Vivax. I think I want to give Artanis an extra day.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
In Haru's world, gobbledy is mafia because gobbledy came up with a mafiaread on Artanis, that he then stuck to for a while, but he only made this scumread because he was desperate to retract it again, because that makes perfect sense. Obviously gobbledy would confidently declare Artanis is mafia, just because later on he wants to take it back, because that makes perfect sense for a mafia to do.
Then when gobbledy gets his scumread to post some content, which is what he wanted all along when he first called his scumread mafia, he can retract his scumread as part of his masterplan and then move on to someone else.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:47 Vivax wrote: That surge in activity by Artanis does look kinda forced. It's like he came into the thread trying to poke in all directions to look like he's doing something, and even then he did it wrong somewhere and said he's terrible at the game.
I think I'm with Haru on this one. Marv strangely stubborn on him. it's like you haven't read the thread at all
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
actually we already know you haven't read the thread, given you accused me of piggybacking the Vivax stuff when I was the first to explain it.
Forgot about that.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:59 Vivax wrote: Marv please lynch me so all my shit gains the credibility required to fuck up you and your scum friends. lol
are you really calling me mafia?
you've seen me play mafia twice in quick succession.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Never one to turn down a request though.
##Unvote ##Vote: Vivax
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
no, let's get you instead.
I desperately want to legitimise your reads by lynching you.
|
|
|
|