|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2014 22:26 marvellosity wrote:On August 05 2014 22:24 HaruRH wrote:
Gobble
I didn't see him do crap with reads. All of them are wishy washy and inconclusive. No promises either.
can you provide specific examples of this? His scumread on me was retracted almost immediately when kush pointed out that he probably didn't read my filter properly. 'It's a good case, I had raised some of my objections about Haru before, but HF persuaded me that just because I don't agree with him doesn't mean he is scum. I still don't like any of his posts, the logic just isn't there. I could be persuaded to vote Haru.' He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread.
why are they not legit scumreads when all your scumreads are the same?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
tbh i could almost lynch Haru for this alone:
On August 05 2014 22:24 HaruRH wrote:
Scumville
Gobble
I didn't see him do crap with reads. All of them are wishy washy and inconclusive. No promises either.
Pooft
Throwing reads everywhere, 0 substantiation. Wolf.
Obiwan
Literally not committing to any scumreads. All his 'scumreads' are either wishy washy or they are just a throwaway read.
Artanis
Similar to gobble. This may be omgus but if you take away his 'haru scumread', he have an unreadable filter with nothing except 'this guy town' 'this post scum' etc. Also, no promised reads so I won't get to see him post actual content outside of his (desperate) read on me.
On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote:
He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread.
he's basically scumreading someone on a self-description, it's ludicrous
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 05 2014 22:38 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2014 21:46 marvellosity wrote:
it's not annoying me that your vote is on me, it's annoying me that your vote is not on someone you think is mafia, which, if you're town, makes you completely fucking incompetent.
And after how you assessed yourself on Skype as town, I don't think you're going for "completely fucking incompetent"
And even if your brain is being retarded, I don't know why you'd willingly play the game in a shit way.
Sort it out buddy. Explain?
He said he considered himself one of the strongest active townies in TL Mafia.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
by "active", I mean, currently playing
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 05 2014 22:40 gobbledydook wrote:
To those who are saying im suspicious:
Every game I have played so far I was mafia.
Guess how much I know about playing town. I'm trying, but just that I'm not up to your standards doesn't mean I'm scum. You can also compare this game to my 2 scumgames to see the difference.
This isn't a trap (well it kinda is), but what do you think the difference is?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
##Unvote
##Vote: Haru
this is like... maybe a statement of intent. It doesn't mean I've gone off Artanis necessarily, or Vivax.
I'm finding it hard to understand the townie mindset behind "all the people he thinks are mafia, I think are mafia too, therefore he is mafia"
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
also that list. dunno why townHaru does that list.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
answer my question if you missed it please gobbledy.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 05 2014 23:00 gobbledydook wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2014 22:56 marvellosity wrote:
answer my question if you missed it please gobbledy. The difference? Do my reads look forced to you here? I'm pretty sure they seemed forced in the mafia games because I was mafia and I had to lie.
ok. I was just curious what you'd say about it, that's all.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 05 2014 23:07 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2014 22:39 marvellosity wrote:tbh i could almost lynch Haru for this alone: On August 05 2014 22:24 HaruRH wrote:
Scumville
Gobble
I didn't see him do crap with reads. All of them are wishy washy and inconclusive. No promises either.
Pooft
Throwing reads everywhere, 0 substantiation. Wolf.
Obiwan
Literally not committing to any scumreads. All his 'scumreads' are either wishy washy or they are just a throwaway read.
Artanis
Similar to gobble. This may be omgus but if you take away his 'haru scumread', he have an unreadable filter with nothing except 'this guy town' 'this post scum' etc. Also, no promised reads so I won't get to see him post actual content outside of his (desperate) read on me.
On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote:
He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread. he's basically scumreading someone on a self-description, it's ludicrous wrong. I'm both scumreading and null reading these people. However, I draw the line between 'promised reads' vs 'never posting reads', which pooft is already stating, gobble is already doing. Also, artanis' s sheepvote is unwarranted. This post ^ above is not saying anything conclusive. Yes, from now on, I'm going full throttle.
??
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 05 2014 23:07 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2014 22:39 marvellosity wrote:tbh i could almost lynch Haru for this alone: On August 05 2014 22:24 HaruRH wrote:
Scumville
Gobble
I didn't see him do crap with reads. All of them are wishy washy and inconclusive. No promises either.
Pooft
Throwing reads everywhere, 0 substantiation. Wolf.
Obiwan
Literally not committing to any scumreads. All his 'scumreads' are either wishy washy or they are just a throwaway read.
Artanis
Similar to gobble. This may be omgus but if you take away his 'haru scumread', he have an unreadable filter with nothing except 'this guy town' 'this post scum' etc. Also, no promised reads so I won't get to see him post actual content outside of his (desperate) read on me.
On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote:
He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread. he's basically scumreading someone on a self-description, it's ludicrous wrong. I'm both scumreading and null reading these people. However, I draw the line between 'promised reads' vs 'never posting reads', which pooft is already stating, gobble is already doing.
this is just convoluted and explains nothing, by the way.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I still don't understand why gobble is mafia for suspecting the same people that you do.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 05 2014 23:17 HaruRH wrote:
2) yes and no. I said I dont give reads d1. I did not say I dont give weak list posts. Quote where I said it IN CONTEXT to the previous post I am replying to.
but you don't as town and you did in your mafia game
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
but if you can satisfactorily explain this gobble thing to me, that would help a lot.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I just want him to talk to me about gobble.
For realsies.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 05 2014 23:25 HaruRH wrote:
2) gobble's reads, outside of his definite read on artanis early on, have been drifting too much for my liking. If you read his filter in between his artanis and scumread on me, everything is a null read. Furthermore, there was no indication of further content so I put him in scumtown first.
But this is bullshit, gobbledy has been plenty decisive on various things. Artanis is mafia, you're his 2nd read, Poofter is mafia.
Of course he's not going to give 100% reads on everybody.
And the people he is scumreading are the people in your scumville. I just don't understand this at all.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
like gobble probably has the best post:content ratio in the game.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 05 2014 23:35 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On August 05 2014 23:27 marvellosity wrote:On August 05 2014 23:25 HaruRH wrote:
2) gobble's reads, outside of his definite read on artanis early on, have been drifting too much for my liking. If you read his filter in between his artanis and scumread on me, everything is a null read. Furthermore, there was no indication of further content so I put him in scumtown first. But this is bullshit, gobbledy has been plenty decisive on various things. Artanis is mafia, you're his 2nd read, Poofter is mafia. Of course he's not going to give 100% reads on everybody. And the people he is scumreading are the people in your scumville. I just don't understand this at all. That is purely a coincidence. I did not take anyone's read on others into account. This is purely my own. 'I could be persuaded to vote Haru. Obi: Null read atm Artanis: I said before, I think he's come out with good discussion and so I unvoted him.' These shows me he is pretty null on them. 'But no, seriously, your contribution level is still zero.' This shows me that he is waiting for pooft to produce content.
so you picked out one of the only times in his whole filter where he isn't totally decisive. this is coming across as a horrible misrepresentation of his filter...
don't understand the point you're trying to make about poofter/content either and why it would make gobble mafia
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 05 2014 23:41 Vivax wrote:
Marv wtf are you doing
...
wtf are you doing?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
