|
On July 31 2014 05:28 Teemursu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 05:20 GlowingBear wrote: Oh, and by the way, Teemu, this sounds like your town play so I'm also putting you in my town circle, although I'll have to filter dive you if I live past night1 You should definitely do your usual "imply someone is a blue during n1 and remember it's a bad idea" again. :D (hopefully not on me, though). LOL I'd never say that I think that meatpudding is probably blue.
|
Tolkien, on the case I brought I specifically said they were distancing from each other and then I said that how unnatural was Jenny trying to "defend" someone who looked scummy. I WASN'T saying that they were scummy together based on a single interaction. I said both were scummy AND that it would make sense if they were partners. They have specific reasons. 1) I called Seeyalater scum because of a post he says someone is scum but not mafia. Sounded like he wasn't too much involved and felt very mafia motivated. 2) I called Jenny scum because it felt completely unnatural they say she jumped trying to justify Seeyalater's attitude instead of scum hunting.
These are separate reasons that could be solely used by their on. Interactions that I've brought we're only to support this vision.
Btw, don't bother posting, you two guys, we've already got your reasonings. I'm just explaining my case since its primary argument is not based on associations.
|
By "posting" I meant "replying". Keep posting.
|
Who are you voting, poof?
|
Why aren't you voting meatpudding? Why aren't people voting meatpudding?
|
People voting for Teemu: you're voting on a guy who has been posting since the beginning and did not post something CLEARLY scummy instead of voting for a guy that has around 6 posts and when he sees people voting him for lurking, comes back and say OH HAI LET ME VOTE and goes back to lurking
|
JUST AT LEAST PRESSURE MEATPUDDING, GODDAMIT!
I've been saying that over and over! You're trying to kill people we have information to work on but you're letting lurkers that we have no information living!
Come ON!
Votecount, please! We need to know what wagons are happening
|
On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please.
On July 31 2014 07:01 GlowingBear wrote: Tolkien, on the case I brought I specifically said they were distancing from each other and then I said that how unnatural was Jenny trying to "defend" someone who looked scummy. I WASN'T saying that they were scummy together based on a single interaction. I said both were scummy AND that it would make sense if they were partners. They have specific reasons. 1) I called Seeyalater scum because of a post he says someone is scum but not mafia. Sounded like he wasn't too much involved and felt very mafia motivated. 2) I called Jenny scum because it felt completely unnatural they say she jumped trying to justify Seeyalater's attitude instead of scum hunting.
These are separate reasons that could be solely used by their on. Interactions that I've brought we're only to support this vision.
Btw, don't bother posting, you two guys, we've already got your reasonings. I'm just explaining my case since its primary argument is not based on associations.
If you think that this case is not paying attention to the thread at that moment, I don't know what is to pay attention anymore. Anyway, tomorrow will be an easier day.
|
On July 31 2014 12:18 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 12:15 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please. On July 31 2014 07:01 GlowingBear wrote: Tolkien, on the case I brought I specifically said they were distancing from each other and then I said that how unnatural was Jenny trying to "defend" someone who looked scummy. I WASN'T saying that they were scummy together based on a single interaction. I said both were scummy AND that it would make sense if they were partners. They have specific reasons. 1) I called Seeyalater scum because of a post he says someone is scum but not mafia. Sounded like he wasn't too much involved and felt very mafia motivated. 2) I called Jenny scum because it felt completely unnatural they say she jumped trying to justify Seeyalater's attitude instead of scum hunting.
These are separate reasons that could be solely used by their on. Interactions that I've brought we're only to support this vision.
Btw, don't bother posting, you two guys, we've already got your reasonings. I'm just explaining my case since its primary argument is not based on associations. If you think that this case is not paying attention to the thread at that moment, I don't know what is to pay attention anymore. Anyway, tomorrow will be an easier day. Do you think you're making the best cases/playing the best town you can?
I believe that was the best case I could present at the moment it was presented. More than actually pointing out scums, it served the purpose of make people bring more information to the thread. I could read Jenny as town after that, and also could you. I still have to read seeyalater's filter after that, though.
It is impossible to make very good cases so early on day1. I thought that sharing this idea and gather information from the reactions was better than to stay quiet...
|
On July 31 2014 13:03 Teemursu wrote: Didn't someone read mp town for his terrible liszt post?
Did you? I'm afraid he can be but be really needs to unlurk
|
On July 31 2014 13:22 meatpudding wrote: Hey guys I'm back. Anyone want to talk?
You can start by telling us why you are a bad lynch and who you think that should be lynched.
|
On July 31 2014 13:36 meatpudding wrote: You know why I think I shouldn't be lynched, we need to find scum. Do we all consider lilwade to be town now? Why hasn't Jenny voted Teemu when she said he was scummy?
You do understand that that list you've brought sounds scummy ad that you lurking all the way also sounds scummy, right? You gotta make us believe that there are better options and saying just that isn't helping you
|
On July 31 2014 13:46 meatpudding wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 13:36 meatpudding wrote: You know why I think I shouldn't be lynched, we need to find scum. Do we all consider lilwade to be town now? Why hasn't Jenny voted Teemu when she said he was scummy? You do understand that that list you've brought sounds scummy ad that you lurking all the way also sounds scummy, right? You gotta make us believe that there are better options and saying just that isn't helping you Sorry my posts are so short. I have only limited time each day but I'm catching up with the thread. Hey I'm not the only lurker *ahem* Town plays to find who is mafia and what are they doing. Scum play is to lead to mislynches until you win. What Tea is doing is to try to talk people into committing too hard or contradicting themselves. Town always contradict and make mistakes on d1. His posts are not clearly scummy nor are they clearly town, leading me to believe he is scum waiting for the right wagon. On the great GB. I think he is another type of scum. What he is doing is to try to be objective and logical while building up a case. I think he's trying too hard, and exaggerating a bit much for me to find it believable. This is scum trying to mislead town. 666 and cya I will need to filter dive some more. Right now I would still prefer to leave my vote on tea if it were an option.
I'd like you to specifically filter dive 666 and bring your read on him.
|
On July 31 2014 14:00 meatpudding wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 13:50 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 13:46 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 13:36 meatpudding wrote: You know why I think I shouldn't be lynched, we need to find scum. Do we all consider lilwade to be town now? Why hasn't Jenny voted Teemu when she said he was scummy? You do understand that that list you've brought sounds scummy ad that you lurking all the way also sounds scummy, right? You gotta make us believe that there are better options and saying just that isn't helping you Sorry my posts are so short. I have only limited time each day but I'm catching up with the thread. Hey I'm not the only lurker *ahem* Town plays to find who is mafia and what are they doing. Scum play is to lead to mislynches until you win. What Tea is doing is to try to talk people into committing too hard or contradicting themselves. Town always contradict and make mistakes on d1. His posts are not clearly scummy nor are they clearly town, leading me to believe he is scum waiting for the right wagon. On the great GB. I think he is another type of scum. What he is doing is to try to be objective and logical while building up a case. I think he's trying too hard, and exaggerating a bit much for me to find it believable. This is scum trying to mislead town. 666 and cya I will need to filter dive some more. Right now I would still prefer to leave my vote on tea if it were an option. I'd like you to specifically filter dive 666 and bring your read on him. Show nested quote +On July 30 2014 10:33 Seeyalater wrote: Oh my bad completely skipped over him. I'll be 100% honest, he's completely fallen off my radar since he talked earlier. Actually had to go look at his previous posts in this thread, and have realized how little he's done in the game. His first read on GB seemed townie aligned, but him dropping off afterwards and the weird comment he made at teemu have made me put him on the leaning mafia side, though not someone I'd want to push on today. This quote from cya sums up how I feel on 666 so far. All this tells me is that cya is not scum if 666 is, because he would be too carful and not "accidentally" forget him.
I ask you to filter dive 666, you bring cya's post. You said you have to filter dive him. Suddenly you see his vote in Teemu and thinks that just because that he is town.
Why bringing up cya's? I understand he shares the view but I asked your opinion, you're just reproducing someone's, which is easy. More than that, you bring another unrelated person to the conversation when we are talking about you.
|
On July 31 2014 14:10 DCLXVI wrote: ##Unvote
##Vote MeatPudding
Lol completely random. Care to explain before leaving?
|
Meatpudding you're dying today Meatpudding there's no other way Meatpudding you're getting astray Meatpudding I hate rhymes.
|
On July 31 2014 14:22 meatpudding wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 14:13 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 14:00 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 13:50 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 13:46 meatpudding wrote:On July 31 2014 13:41 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 13:36 meatpudding wrote: You know why I think I shouldn't be lynched, we need to find scum. Do we all consider lilwade to be town now? Why hasn't Jenny voted Teemu when she said he was scummy? You do understand that that list you've brought sounds scummy ad that you lurking all the way also sounds scummy, right? You gotta make us believe that there are better options and saying just that isn't helping you Sorry my posts are so short. I have only limited time each day but I'm catching up with the thread. Hey I'm not the only lurker *ahem* Town plays to find who is mafia and what are they doing. Scum play is to lead to mislynches until you win. What Tea is doing is to try to talk people into committing too hard or contradicting themselves. Town always contradict and make mistakes on d1. His posts are not clearly scummy nor are they clearly town, leading me to believe he is scum waiting for the right wagon. On the great GB. I think he is another type of scum. What he is doing is to try to be objective and logical while building up a case. I think he's trying too hard, and exaggerating a bit much for me to find it believable. This is scum trying to mislead town. 666 and cya I will need to filter dive some more. Right now I would still prefer to leave my vote on tea if it were an option. I'd like you to specifically filter dive 666 and bring your read on him. On July 30 2014 10:33 Seeyalater wrote: Oh my bad completely skipped over him. I'll be 100% honest, he's completely fallen off my radar since he talked earlier. Actually had to go look at his previous posts in this thread, and have realized how little he's done in the game. His first read on GB seemed townie aligned, but him dropping off afterwards and the weird comment he made at teemu have made me put him on the leaning mafia side, though not someone I'd want to push on today. This quote from cya sums up how I feel on 666 so far. All this tells me is that cya is not scum if 666 is, because he would be too carful and not "accidentally" forget him. I ask you to filter dive 666, you bring cya's post. You said you have to filter dive him. Suddenly you see his vote in Teemu and thinks that just because that he is town. Why bringing up cya's? I understand he shares the view but I asked your opinion, you're just reproducing someone's, which is easy. More than that, you bring another unrelated person to the conversation when we are talking about you. I did say I needed to read both cya's and 666's filter. I brought up that post because I had a null read up until I read 666's more logical posts. Generally there is a towny way to make a case which is what I find in his logic.
Ok, fair logic, but unconvincing. 666 brought his case on Teemu and nobody bought it. If you really need Teemu is a better vote than 666, you gotta work that out more.
|
|
Went through cya's filter and I find his posts not so bad, although with lots of fluff. I'd say I'm on the fence regarding him.
And for the case I've brought, I believe the reasoning I've brought was okay. It was okay to think they could be mafia by the posts I've quoted. I thought it was a good idea to push them so we could gather more information. But formatting it like a case may have been a bad idea. It was still the best push I saw at that moment.
Teemu, I was going to filter dive you but you have 6 pages and it's almost 3am here. I have a really important exam tomorrow. I'll do it later. Don't be mad
|
On July 31 2014 14:48 Lord Tolkien wrote: Going to sleep but:
Yeah, I like meatpudding now. May just be me, but he's NOW starting to sound like his last-game play. Sticking to his guns. ima sleep naow
I'm not buying it until he brings more in depth analysis on 666, not only quoting and giving us one liners.
|
|
|
|