Showdown Mafia - Page 3

On July 31 2014 03:57 Vivax wrote:


You called me scum for no reason and HF town in my list post when everyone with a genuine mindset could see that what he was doing was scummy. Kush had a reaction to our exchange I would consider to be townie, cause he was the right things.

Then you cowardly said I had 10 scumreads, no point behind it except malicious discrediting, especially after it turned out you had the same opinion as me on these guys, so no townie mindset behind that comment.

Then you tried to blow me not including marv into something scummy when I delivered a reasonable explanation for it, and you only explained why it was supposed to be scummy when I forced you to do it. So no real intent in proving to the thread how that actually makes me scum.

Overall malicious, dishonest play and a view of the game that doesn't reflect the right mindset.

On July 31 2014 04:06 Vivax wrote:


This is not how to refute a case since anyone can yell incorrect, but not everyone can prove his point with what has happened in the thread. So start hoping that everyone shares this view of yours.

On July 31 2014 04:10 justanothertownie wrote:

Wasn't Titanic the game where Vivax did jackshit as scum? Totally different from this game...

On July 31 2014 04:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:

well can you. how can you say i have no reason to call you mafia or call holyflare town?
or do you know why i read you as mafia and him as town?

On July 31 2014 04:29 Palmar wrote:
Rayn not knowing I'm confirmed town is kinda scummy and Vivian is so pretty.

On July 31 2014 04:34 Palmar wrote:

Nah buddy. Cba. Let's lynch marv.

On July 31 2014 04:37 Vivax wrote:
I'm not the guy who has to calm down, I'm enjoying myself. I post arguments for why HF is scum and he goes ad hominem, so I dunk him for it. I will just keep posting reasons, and he will keep squealing, nice try though.

On July 31 2014 04:36 slOosh wrote:
But seriously, goodkarma, high chance of mafia.

He berates sinani for making a non-post, and suggests bombing ritoky / Damdred / lurkers, when he is guilty of those things himself.

ritoky, you want a good bomb? goodkarma is a good bomb.

On July 31 2014 04:14 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Vivax:
Why do i read you scum and Holyflare town? You need to answer this because you apparently know why.

On July 31 2014 04:50 goodkarma wrote:


Look at any of my prior games and you should know my day 1 usually involves removing people that are most likely to be D1 liabilities. You should also know that I don't spam like crazy in games. Every post I make has a purpose, or I don't post it. I don't talk about jagers or any other random crap. I only post when I feel it'll be helpful. On top of that I don't have a scum read on any of the active players right now. So heaven forbid, that leaves who I've listed as the most likely scum candidates.

Sinani specifically has been brought up. If he behaves this way all game, he's a huge liability and a good bomb target. But from what he's posted it looks like he'll only behave like this day one, and this is why I excluded him.

On July 31 2014 04:55 Vivax wrote:


Dude, whenever I posted something that proved he was scum, he popped up and started complaining and generally tried to get things on a more emotional than rational level.

The proof is on the last pages.
HF:"Vivax pls stop scumreading me"

Me:"This post shows why HF is scum, cause bsbsbs"

HF: "You're either scum or a fucking moron"

All in between rayn trying to stir the fire by siding with HF, and you.

Words don't lie. So you lie by telling me to calm down and pushing tinfoil theories. I use standard arguments, he uses insults and imperatives. Period.

On July 31 2014 04:58 slOosh wrote:

The logic proceeds thus:

Vivax is playing in a way that I construe as strange, perhaps scummy.
I played in a game (Storm 2) where he played scum, and he played more "normal".
Vivax is playing strange, but has the capacity to play not-strange as scum. What could explain this discrepancy?
The former setup of this game included a traitor.
Perhaps Vivax is the traitor, which would explain the strange behavior.

That's basically my thought process. I'm still talking to him because I could just be wrong, but that's my tentative read.