|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 11 2014 19:50 ExO_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 19:30 marvellosity wrote:On July 11 2014 19:25 ExO_ wrote:
I liked marvs Day 1 in Order.
And Robik had a ton of posts before he decided to go to sleep, especially after he said he was going to let me do all the posting. I was actually asleep when he said that, but it's really ridiculous to be riding his ass for that comment when after he said it he proceeded to talk quite a bit. And Robik had a ton of *meaningless posts ftfy It's any town team's responsibility to be as transparent and readable as possible (same as if a townie is on his own). And it's a mafia team's job to be as unreadable as possible. There was a smurf game where I caught VE because he suggested that consolidating posts was a pro-town strategy, when it clearly wasn't. Anyways if Robik plays the game, nothing to worry about, right dear? - M&M Couldn't you make the same meaningless argument for bunnies posts though? Why is she getting a pass? Regardless, I'll be sure to tell Robik to post more
Not really, I fully understood the argument she was pursuing re: Robik (indeed I made the same/similar one some posts back about readability).
Also she is on the unofficial DL team, gives her extra town points.
-M&M
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 11 2014 19:51 Eden1892 wrote:
my good read on OK is that he's town, it's kind of a meta thing because we have pretty similar thought processes when we're town, so the fact that he's almost literally in my head at times in this thread points to him being town to me.
uh more generally i feel like the questions he asked bunnies during the back-and-forth we had about my VT claim were on-point, bunnies' questions didn't seem like they were going anywhere and he was asking specific questions about the direction of her questioning to figure out whether the questions were coming from the right place.
as for why me, i'm town because i'm vanilla townie, but even aside from that... idk same reasons OK is town tbh, like i said my thought process and his have been nearly identical this game. i've been asking pretty similar questions with the same intent (figure out what bunnies was doing, in particular) and so most of what i said about OK applies to me as well
Alright, but you should understand that two people who are not me potentially sharing some sort of thought process isn't very compelling if I'm not you (or possibly him). Yes?
Mafia can ask "on point" questions. In fact it's extremely easy to. I've been doing it already.
-M&M
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
no, it's me being playful.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 11 2014 21:28 Palmar wrote:Actually, I'm going to do this: ##Unvote
##Vote Team WeDemandALawyer3. This post Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote:
Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath.
Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear Talking about stuff that is really easy to talk about without giving any sort of an opinion on anyone in the game. I think it was sinani who pointed out that this post also came at a really awkward time, after people had mostly dropped the kenpachi thing.
Yeah I don't mind this. I noted this too, and that I wasn't sure I believed the phone = behind excuse. Was also confused when bunnies said she liked this post, although I guess that was just because it was taking her side.
-M&M
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
yeah. Like I said, I think it's just because it supported her opinion.
If anyone not-bunnies had posted it, it would have been much weirder.
-M&M
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 11 2014 21:39 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 21:34 marvellosity wrote:On July 11 2014 21:28 Palmar wrote:Actually, I'm going to do this: ##Unvote
##Vote Team WeDemandALawyer3. This post On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote:
Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath.
Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear Talking about stuff that is really easy to talk about without giving any sort of an opinion on anyone in the game. I think it was sinani who pointed out that this post also came at a really awkward time, after people had mostly dropped the kenpachi thing. Yeah I don't mind this. I noted this too, and that I wasn't sure I believed the phone = behind excuse. Was also confused when bunnies said she liked this post, although I guess that was just because it was taking her side. - M&M I don't get what you mean If either me or glowingbear, who came in just a few pages after the kenpachi rule fiasco (that was 10+ pages long), we should definitely be saying something about it. Awkward time or not, we have to talk about it. That's it. You don't have to believe the phone=behind excuse at all. After all, being behind or ahead will not change our answer. -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear
Well, it's not necessarily so much that he talked about it at all, but:
On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote:
Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath.
Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear
So contextually it's beating a dead horse. There's little/no reason to say the bolded
-M&M
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
actually the point is a bit different but still possibly valid.
I'll let you off.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
so I should get my vote on you now while it's still early and get a townread?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 11 2014 22:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##vote: WeDemandALawyer
What do you particularly agree with then?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
why do you not want to see if I'm paying attention, rayn?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
you always try these silly little tests of yours on me.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I don't understand why Haru gives a blanket pass to Palmar for making a case on his slot, yet votes rayn's slot.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
if you're too dumb to work it out, you're too dumb to understand when i explain 
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
so you're voting for him based on wounded pride and because you apparently legitimately think only mafia vote and talk about it later? or what?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 11 2014 23:39 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 23:33 marvellosity wrote:
so you're voting for him based on wounded pride and because you apparently legitimately think only mafia vote and talk about it later? or what? I'm voting him because he had no reasons to vote for us, but chose to anyway So im doing the same
but he quite clearly did have reasons...
stop being antagonistic and help me out here
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
like there is *such* a massive disparity between how you're treating Palmar and rayn, which can't simply be explained by "palmar made a whole case at once and rayn only explained himself 3 minutes after voting"
that doesn't warrant totally opposite reactions
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
robik, you're such an ass.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
not sure where this semantics picking is getting anyone
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 12 2014 00:38 IAmRobik wrote:
Based God harurh.
I am never voting you this game
Your teammate said something super towny
we should forge an alliance
you should recruit rayn/slendy for it since they're town too.
Then we just need to find 1 more team and we've pretty much got ourselves a lock.
what was it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
