EPTTeam Melee Mini Mafia V: Newbies and Vets - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
| ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On July 15 2014 00:00 Koshi wrote: How is that related to the night kills? Scum killed not active people. Now they just stand out more. As I said, super-WIFOMey. But I suspect "vets" would respect "vets" way more than they should, and be more likely to NK them. | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On July 15 2014 00:12 IAmRobik wrote: OK, I mean, the goodkarma reasoning is terrible, but I think he's the one who is linked to Eden, so we can pretty much disregard what he says because Eden is so obviously town. So the reason that I think rayn/slendy could have nk'd marv/plammmar, was that slendy just saw marv wrecked the absolute shit out of mafia within the last 5 minutes of the day in a game we played. marv would end up getting some sort of scum read on rayn and that would be ggwp for rayn. Now, I'm still living in a world where Rayn is town, because everytime I switch my opinion on him half-way through a game I end up being wrong, but there is some merit to them killing vets in a game of this type, where the only townie leading town is pushing in the wrong direction. How is this reasoning any less terrible? | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On July 15 2014 00:48 IAmRobik wrote: Cause your reason didn't make any logical sense. You're saying that lurky mafia killed lurky vets. WHAT!??!? If mafia want to be able to lurk, then they kill off active players -- they don't kill off lurky players, effectively making themselves even more lurky. You should just let Eden play the game, cause you're gonna get him lynched if you keep up with this garb Lol. Why would you even say this? You should be happy when I chime in. If you believe that Eden is town, then having another townie contribute is a good thing, no? By your logic we should only be lynching active players??? By all means we should consider them, but that doesn't mean we exclude the possibility of a lurker scumteam. What ever motivates scum to kill vets? Fear that they'll wake up and solve the game. Especially in Marv's case, who appears to have been legit busy. They may have been lurky, but there's no guarantee they'd stay that way. | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On July 15 2014 01:08 OnceKing wrote: koshi has an interesting case on harubear and i'll probably reevaluate them. gk - who do you think would fear vets waking up and solving the game the most? People who know what they're capable of the most. As in non-newbies. Tbh, I'm more concerned about activity level than night kill speculation. Because night kill speculation is just that, speculation. | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
Game's pretty much won. Only real question is if we trust the cop claim or not. | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
And good job to my partner Eden.  No doubt he's town MVP. | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
Not that important, but would be interesting to see how the town internally read the game as it progressed. | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On July 17 2014 03:22 Palmar wrote: I guess if people are interested we can post the convo. Guessing you just called town bad. No big deal. | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On July 18 2014 14:53 Wile E. Coyote wrote: I have a smurf and openly apologize for my bullshit here If you were truly sorry you would man up and accept your ban without squirreling out of it on a smurf account. | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
The thing is that his self ban was clearly a part of the consideration in determining whether he should receive a game ban post-game. I'd like to see his case reconsidered if he's really intent on circumventing his own ban. Clearly some of the NSFW images he posted and his demeanor were completely inappropriate and had no place in this game. There should have been some punitive action whether it was from himself or the host. | ||
| ||
