|
On July 11 2014 21:47 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 21:45 Palmar wrote:On July 11 2014 21:41 HaruRH wrote:On July 11 2014 21:37 Palmar wrote:On July 11 2014 21:34 HaruRH wrote:On July 11 2014 21:28 Palmar wrote:Actually, I'm going to do this: ##Unvote
##Vote Team WeDemandALawyerThe reasons: 1. They both seemed excited to play pre-game, but haven't posted anything of value. 2. This post On July 11 2014 11:47 GlowingBear wrote:
/confirm
Hello guys, it's my second game here.
It seems that there is a ruckus going on already. Can someone explain me what Is the Kenpachi rule?
Also, I'll be signing every post of mine with a bolded "-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear" so it gets easier to identify the team.
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear Specifically the bolded sentence feels like massively useless fluff observation. 3. This post On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote:
Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath.
Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear Talking about stuff that is really easy to talk about without giving any sort of an opinion on anyone in the game. I think it was sinani who pointed out that this post also came at a really awkward time, after people had mostly dropped the kenpachi thing. 3. This post On July 11 2014 19:59 HaruRH wrote:
/confirm
Robik is going to be afk? But exo is a d1 non-poster too...
Meh
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear
I like the summary of his opinion on the issue. "Meh". 1) we were excited to play yes. But not terribly excited to talk about kenpachi rule for 10 pages. 2) this means we won't see robik/exo team for a whole of d1. Meh. 3) fluff = scum? UNICORNS AND DRAGONS WEEEEEE Good defense. I will now unvote you. Oh wait, I don't have anything better to vote for. Do you think my case on you guys makes me mafia? I don't think making a case on anyone makes you scum. #freedomofspeech -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear Well if you are town, either I'm town, and I am mistaken accidentally, or I'm mafia, and I'm forcing a case by being maliciously ignorant. I don't want to omgus so early :/ So you're mistaken accidentally. -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear
Thanks. Now I'm confirmed town.
|
Thx ExO_ for not even acknowledging we exist 
|
Oh wait, ExO called us mafia with HaruRH and co.
I can't beat that logic.
So yeah, I'm going to vote ExO because his scumreads are basically an admission that he hasn't read the thread. If he had, he'd know that the most unlikely mafia pair is probably us/lawyer. My vote and case on lawyer was like the first serious accusation in the thread.
|
On July 12 2014 01:24 mderg wrote:
Can we lynch Robik for being a liar?
On it. But in my case mostly for ExO writing a bullshit summary post that has nothing to do with the thread we're working in.
|
On July 12 2014 01:29 ExO_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2014 01:25 Palmar wrote:On July 12 2014 01:24 mderg wrote:
Can we lynch Robik for being a liar? On it. But in my case mostly for ExO writing a bullshit summary post that has nothing to do with the thread we're working in. What about my case is bullshit? I literally just went through the filter of every other player in this game. My reads may not be perfect, but I don't think I'm particularly good at day 1 reads. But how am I going to improve as a player if I don't get out of my comfort zone? That's what I'm doing here, so yeah there might be mistakes. I'll give you that I skimmed some parts, and likely missed a thing that was said here or there. But I did go through everybody, so telling me I didn't read is insulting to me, because I don't see you offering anything better
You did not read the thread, it's a fact.
This is what you said about us:
Team Magic Carpet
Not a lot of posts from straightform just asking questions "Robik why won't u post?, Why would exo/robik not posting Day 1 not be bad for town" etc... Palmar calls out team lawyer for not posting anything of value, but I see very little of value from him at all. After reading his filter i think Palmar is the most scummy looking person so far in the thread.
*scum read* [/i][/i]
This cannot be true, because by the time I called out Lawyer and co, that was the only serious vote/contribution to the thread. No one else had bothered to actually do anything that could move the game forward. So your sentence "I see very little from him at all" is wrong.
So I think it's not insulting at all to say you're not reading the thread. The alternative, that you read the thread and simply don't understand it, would be more insulting.
|
On July 12 2014 01:39 sqrtofneg1 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 21:13 sinani206 wrote:
hey palmar.
what do you think of robik. Why does sinani call out palmar in particular? Why hasn't he done anything yet? OK is better, but not by much. He also asks others of what they think of robik too. Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 14:57 OnceKing wrote:
So based on what he's said thus far what think you of robik I'm not sure what to make of this team. I wouldn't mind lynching them. *insert grape picture here*
I was in the thread at the time sinani posted.
Sinani never does anything anyway.
|
On July 12 2014 01:31 sqrtofneg1 wrote:I do not like palmar. (this seems to be a trend) He hasn't /confirmed yet. First post: And then does nothing for a significant amount of time.
This post was written before the game started.
On July 12 2014 01:31 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Also this is not the palmar I saw when I played him. He was more analytical, more smart that game. This game, not so much.
So this is your case.
I don't even know.
Stratiform, I don't have a clue.
But this is my best read so far. They're mafia.
##Vote: Team Magic Computer
![[image loading]](http://www.banfiwines.com/wp-content/uploads/cabernet-sauvignon-670x390.jpg) [/QUOTE]
|
(fixed, removed pointless stuff at end)
On July 12 2014 01:31 sqrtofneg1 wrote:I do not like palmar. (this seems to be a trend) He hasn't /confirmed yet. First post: And then does nothing for a significant amount of time.
This post was written before the game started.
On July 12 2014 01:31 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Also this is not the palmar I saw when I played him. He was more analytical, more smart that game. This game, not so much.
So this is your case.
I don't even know.
|
On July 12 2014 01:46 ExO_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2014 01:40 Palmar wrote:On July 12 2014 01:29 ExO_ wrote:On July 12 2014 01:25 Palmar wrote:On July 12 2014 01:24 mderg wrote:
Can we lynch Robik for being a liar? On it. But in my case mostly for ExO writing a bullshit summary post that has nothing to do with the thread we're working in. What about my case is bullshit? I literally just went through the filter of every other player in this game. My reads may not be perfect, but I don't think I'm particularly good at day 1 reads. But how am I going to improve as a player if I don't get out of my comfort zone? That's what I'm doing here, so yeah there might be mistakes. I'll give you that I skimmed some parts, and likely missed a thing that was said here or there. But I did go through everybody, so telling me I didn't read is insulting to me, because I don't see you offering anything better You did not read the thread, it's a fact. This is what you said about us: Team Magic Carpet
Not a lot of posts from straightform just asking questions "Robik why won't u post?, Why would exo/robik not posting Day 1 not be bad for town" etc.. Palmar calls out team lawyer for not posting anything of value, but I see very little of value from him at all. After reading his filter i think Palmar is the most scummy looking person so far in the thread.
*scum read* This cannot be true, because by the time I called out Lawyer and co, that was the only serious vote/contribution to the thread. No one else had bothered to actually do anything that could move the game forward. So your sentence "I see very little from him at all" is wrong. So I think it's not insulting at all to say you're not reading the thread. The alternative, that you read the thread and simply don't understand it, would be more insulting. You think the post you made calling lawyer and co out was contributing in a good way? You think just voting is contributing in a good way? I don't believe what you have said so far is contributing in a major way. Perhaps you aren't as good at conveying your thoughts to the town as you think?
I did not just vote.
Again with the reading comprehension.
|
On July 12 2014 01:47 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2014 01:46 Palmar wrote:On July 12 2014 01:31 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Also this is not the palmar I saw when I played him. He was more analytical, more smart that game. This game, not so much. So this is your case. I don't even know. What's wrong with it, buddy?
It's wrong, and completely objective.
|
by objective I mean subjective.
|
On July 12 2014 01:49 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2014 01:48 Palmar wrote:On July 12 2014 01:47 marvellosity wrote:On July 12 2014 01:46 Palmar wrote:On July 12 2014 01:31 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Also this is not the palmar I saw when I played him. He was more analytical, more smart that game. This game, not so much. So this is your case. I don't even know. What's wrong with it, buddy? It's wrong, and completely objective. Lots of mafia reads, especially meta ones, are subjective (which i presume you meant) yes/no ?
Yes, but they're based on something. If he can demonstrate in any way that I was more analytical and smart in that game, that's cool.
I don't think he even remembers what I had done... 20-ish hours into that game. And I'm tempted to go check.
|
screw it, you're all awful.
I'm going to play dota.
|
On July 12 2014 01:50 ExO_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2014 01:48 Palmar wrote:On July 12 2014 01:46 ExO_ wrote:On July 12 2014 01:40 Palmar wrote:On July 12 2014 01:29 ExO_ wrote:On July 12 2014 01:25 Palmar wrote:On July 12 2014 01:24 mderg wrote:
Can we lynch Robik for being a liar? On it. But in my case mostly for ExO writing a bullshit summary post that has nothing to do with the thread we're working in. What about my case is bullshit? I literally just went through the filter of every other player in this game. My reads may not be perfect, but I don't think I'm particularly good at day 1 reads. But how am I going to improve as a player if I don't get out of my comfort zone? That's what I'm doing here, so yeah there might be mistakes. I'll give you that I skimmed some parts, and likely missed a thing that was said here or there. But I did go through everybody, so telling me I didn't read is insulting to me, because I don't see you offering anything better You did not read the thread, it's a fact. This is what you said about us: Team Magic Carpet
Not a lot of posts from straightform just asking questions "Robik why won't u post?, Why would exo/robik not posting Day 1 not be bad for town" etc.. Palmar calls out team lawyer for not posting anything of value, but I see very little of value from him at all. After reading his filter i think Palmar is the most scummy looking person so far in the thread.
*scum read* This cannot be true, because by the time I called out Lawyer and co, that was the only serious vote/contribution to the thread. No one else had bothered to actually do anything that could move the game forward. So your sentence "I see very little from him at all" is wrong. So I think it's not insulting at all to say you're not reading the thread. The alternative, that you read the thread and simply don't understand it, would be more insulting. You think the post you made calling lawyer and co out was contributing in a good way? You think just voting is contributing in a good way? I don't believe what you have said so far is contributing in a major way. Perhaps you aren't as good at conveying your thoughts to the town as you think? I did not just vote. Again with the reading comprehension. I said your post wasn't contributing, therefore leaving just the vote. If you're posts aren't contributing, and your vote isn't contributing what is? That was what I was saying. But I'm the one with reading comprehension problems lol.....
My post was contributing because it brought up points. The followup also brought up points. You can argue that the contributions were bad, but you cannot argue that they weren't there.
|
On July 12 2014 01:52 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2014 01:51 Palmar wrote:
screw it, you're all awful.
I'm going to play dota. really. ##Vote: The Magic Computer
If you actually think this then you're mafia.
If I somehow get lynched. Lynch marv. No questions, no arguments. The rest of you are possibly bad enough to actually think this way, but marv isn't.
|
And I'm changing my vote accordingly.
|
ExO_ being thickheaded and annoying probably means he and robik are town.
I think OnceKing and Eden are both town (I know they're from separate teams).
Aside from nb's comment on liking glowingbear's post (which wasn't townie at all) I had at least a tiny townread on both of them, mostly from the fact that poofter was actually posting literally anything day 1.
|
On July 12 2014 01:58 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2014 01:54 Palmar wrote:On July 12 2014 01:52 marvellosity wrote:On July 12 2014 01:51 Palmar wrote:
screw it, you're all awful.
I'm going to play dota. really. ##Vote: The Magic Computer If you actually think this then you're mafia. If I somehow get lynched. Lynch marv. No questions, no arguments. The rest of you are possibly bad enough to actually think this way, but marv isn't. To think what way? Last time I remember that you told town to go screw itself like that was in Cell. What way do you think I'm thinking in exactly here, Plammy?
You voted me, therefore you think I'm mafia. Given my current contributions to the thread, there is literally no reason for you to think I'm mafia, in fact, you _should_ have a slight townread on me.
So for some reason, your thought process isn't natural or clear, or possibly you're trolling.
|
Also, hey mafia, I think poofter may possibly have softclaimed parity cop. Shoot him pls.
|
I like contributions from teamgoodcopbadcop, they're more useful than most of you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
