Noir Mini Mafia: Chapter 2

On July 17 2014 05:49 IAmRobik wrote:
I kinda feel like 1 mafia is defending me, but i'll fucking take it. anything to not get mislynched

On July 17 2014 12:51 kushm4sta wrote:
snickers, the post in which I asked you the same question twice, i also asked you a new question. I was just consolidating my questions.

And no I didn't read a lot of your filter, nor have I read any of your town filters. I actually have to read one of your town filters to get a good meta read of you, you are right.
But the reason why I unvoted you was because your posts looked less tryhard than your scumgame. So I'm not going to vote someone for shitposting, if they don't shitpost as scum.

ANYWAY something doesn't sit right about you still. You are too tired to explain thoughts you already had, like why things you said were scummy were scummy, yet you had plenty of energy to concoct this shitcase against me for "asking questions." Seems like explaining your old suspicions would be quicker than coming up with new ones.
Add to that the fact that your suspicion is very omgusy.

##vote snickers

still wanna read one of your towngames before I feel confident in the vote though.

On July 17 2014 13:45 ObiWanShinobi wrote:




._.

.________________.

On July 18 2014 04:28 MysteryMeat1 wrote:


In the last game snickers was a lot more douchey as mafia, Rereading over his filter after my thoughts on BH i think they could potentially be together, but i just feel like all of his posts scream scummy and if he was mafia i think he would be more subtle than that. Probably donkey town

On July 18 2014 05:05 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
my filter is bigger than yours, rofl.

good luck lynching me. youll need it.

On July 18 2014 15:10 gobbledydook wrote:
I think we can ignore MM1 and Snickers' claims, probably just joking.

On July 18 2014 15:11 Blazinghand wrote:


Ugh, i just want you all to know that all of you who are jokingly fakeclaiming are awful and making it difficult to determine who is actually counterclaiming, thereby making it easier for scum.

unless snickers retracts his claim I will not unvote him, since he hard claimed.

On July 18 2014 15:22 ObiWanShinobi wrote:


why are you asking this question? this guy is confirmed mafia to you, it shouldnt matter how many times he softed or whatever.

On July 18 2014 06:20 Blazinghand wrote:
Nobody's lynching me today. Not even you lot are dumb enough to lynch an uncced blue claim, and there will not be a cc.

On July 18 2014 15:38 Blazinghand wrote:


I just want you to realize how stupid you are. What if right after you hardclaimed cop, I got hammered, with my dying wish being that you get lynched tomorrow?

ugh

whatever i'm done until mm1 or robik is back, none of you are relevant

On July 18 2014 06:27 Blazinghand wrote:
Also, I claimed at 3 votes because I didn't want to die. There's no reason to lynch me today. Unless scum has an RB or chooses to shoot me, I'll have a check tomorrow. The only way I'm getting lynched is if scum CCs, which is much better than claiming at 4 votes, and scum hammering me. Scum would be lynched D2 for hammering me, but they'd still prefer that then getting into a CC battle with me and potentially losing and getting lynched first.

On July 18 2014 16:31 gobbledydook wrote:


No, it's not only that it's wrong. Being wrong is fine, I'm probably wrong on some of my reads too, this being a 'guessing game of epic proportions'. But it's that he was offering one line posts (no effort), then trying to justify his no effort with a weak argument that therefore I refuted and used as evidence to vote him. Do note that this was in the first half of the first page of his filter. Since then he has contributed more, possibly because of the votes pressuring him.

And then he does the weird fake claim shit, I mean wtf? I don't even know what to think of that.

On July 16 2014 18:52 gobbledydook wrote:
So let's have a recap of what's been said and done:

BH RNGs robik to lynch, obi and me vote him to see what happens.
robik becomes defensive and shouts that this is a bullshit lynch, it would be the first time he got mislynched (or lynched), and insults the people who voted him.
BH thinks robik is really scum after those responses, which sounds like a scum getting randomly caught and raging. The implication being that a real town, secure in his innocence, wouldn't need to defend himself emotionally against what is essentially a nonsense lynch. Whereas a scum instinctively will protect himself strongly as scum are not expendable compared to town.

I agree with that line of reasoning, but I want to confirm, BH, is that what you think too? Do you have anything else to add?

On July 18 2014 16:39 gobbledydook wrote:








such oneliner much content

the shit in the middle before the post I quoted was buried in a mile of robik spam, tldr, seems to be some accusation of kushmasta that I missed. Sorry.

On July 18 2014 16:58 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
im willing to vote gg but i refuse to vote until the blue claims stop derping so hard.

i refuse to move any further until the wifom train stops.

On July 18 2014 16:31 Snickers wrote:
You seem to be proud of claiming pr day one. Surely it is not ideal.

On July 19 2014 04:08 Blazinghand wrote:


scumslip, since if you think I'm scum, then mm the confirmed blue would be eating the bullet tonight, right? so you're scum with mm.

lynch mm then snickers after I die

On July 19 2014 04:49 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
if we dont lynch in the cop claims today, then we basically have to lynch snickers.

we cant allow him to survive to lylo, and if we miss in cops tomorrow, then were stuck with him. like...we have to lynch him. have to.

On July 19 2014 04:11 Snickers wrote:
why would you be safe?

On July 20 2014 01:18 IAmRobik wrote:
Whatever. Lynching BH was fucking terrible. I really don't care at this point. I'm about to hammer MM1 cause BH wanted me to even though I don't think MM1 is scum

I'd rather just be done with this disgrace of a game. I feel like every game that I've played lately has been the biggest fucking garbage shitshow.

In fact, here I go. Here's to proving that MM1 is town!

##vote: MysteryMeat1

itisnightnoposting

I'm gonna laugh so hard at myself if he's scum, but I really really don't believe that he is.

If MM1 is town, make sure that you lynch snickers tomorrow. If you don't lynch snickers I'll be super duper fucking mad

On July 20 2014 01:18 IAmRobik wrote:
Whatever. Lynching BH was fucking terrible. I really don't care at this point. I'm about to hammer MM1 cause BH wanted me to even though I don't think MM1 is scum

I'd rather just be done with this disgrace of a game. I feel like every game that I've played lately has been the biggest fucking garbage shitshow.

In fact, here I go. Here's to proving that MM1 is town!

##vote: MysteryMeat1

itisnightnoposting

I'm gonna laugh so hard at myself if he's scum, but I really really don't believe that he is.

If MM1 is town, make sure that you lynch snickers tomorrow. If you don't lynch snickers I'll be super duper fucking mad

On July 19 2014 00:53 IAmRobik wrote:
MM is fake claiming because he thinks he's going to take a bullet for BH. The problem is that in order to take a bullet for the blue, he has to be pushing on the mafia who's claiming blue

On July 19 2014 23:45 IAmRobik wrote:
Did someone give MM1 the opportunity to rescind his claim? NOPE. Snickers hammered before mm1 had a chance to get back

On July 20 2014 13:18 Damdred wrote:
I regret killing BH i don't regret killing MM i regret voting and running to work and letting a hammer happen almost instantly

On July 20 2014 13:13 Damdred wrote:
Go ahead and vote me just will kill another vt your just an ass snickers

On July 20 2014 14:01 Damdred wrote:
Ok. I'm not trying to throw the game I just got frustrated with everything.

I'm a vt i didn't vote much day one trying to. ask questions and reading the thread. day two i acted to quickly without thinking.

obviously snickers is going to tear everything i write up and make it look like I'm scum .

Why did i ask the question? I was curious about your reasons really.

On July 20 2014 14:01 Damdred wrote:
Ok. I'm not trying to throw the game I just got frustrated with everything.

I'm a vt i didn't vote much day one trying to. ask questions and reading the thread. day two i acted to quickly without thinking.

obviously snickers is going to tear everything i write up and make it look like I'm scum .

Why did i ask the question? I was curious about your reasons really.

On July 20 2014 16:46 gobbledydook wrote:
First I don't think snickers and damdred are both mafia and making a show out of it. If they were both mafia, they wouldn't attack each other and give town a chance to lynch them. So at most 1 of them can be mafia.


What damdred did:

he defends robik's rng lynch, gives some excuse for being inactive, then accuses snickers of being scummy because he doesn't respond directly to questions. Then he votes BH for not having any read other than rng. BH dies right before he could unvote, day 2 he hammers MM1, then day 3 is damdred twisting himself hard to apologize for lynching 2 towns.

Here's my take on what damdred's thinking:

damdred the scum wanted some town cred, so he makes the obvious defense of robik, forgoing the chance to hammer him day 1 as it would be very suspicious. Snicker attacks his lack of contribution, and damdred gives an excuse, anniversary with wife etc. We don't know if that was actually true, so let's assume it was the case and damdred was indeed busy. Then, feeling the need to 'contribute', he looks at the person who last attacked him, looks through his filter, and picks holes in it. Unfortunately the snickers bandwagon doesn't work and seeing a promising BH bandwagon hops on it with little explanation. He puts unvote after the hammer has hit to earn towncred for attempting to thwart the mislynch.
Day 2 he hammers MM1 because it's a mislynch for the taking.
Day 3, snickers presses him on the BH vote and MM1 vote. Now feeling that snickers is on to something, he tries to defend himself and apologise and bend over himself, but snickers smells scum and he panics.

The impression is that he's only writing when being pressured, and otherwise trying to lay low.


I'm not going to vote yet, I want to hear more from everyone first.

On July 21 2014 14:06 IAmRobik wrote:
So, I was away which is why I wasn't posting. I was super annoyed at this game and at another game I was playing. I knew exactly what I was doing and will most likely get banned for it after the game is over, because I am in fact town. I will appeal however based off the premise that I was following the wise words of BH.

Having said that, Snickers argument for why I'm mafia is laughable. He says that everyone and their mothers could say that MM1 is trying to take a bullet for the cop. You know who said that, NOBODY BUT ME. I just want to shove it down each and every one of your throats that all of you need to study the game instead of play fucking aimlessly.

Lynching BH on d1 was a travesty.
Lynching MM1 (which I was obviously a part of because LOL@allofyou) was fucking godawful.

I'm just gonna sack the fuck up and vote snickers, because I've said we need to lynch him for a while now. If he doesn't get insta-hammer he's scum. If he does, well he was town and I fucked up. I really don't care anymore at this point. I should have just hammered myself on d1 so I wouldn't have actually had to deal with stupid people

And on that note:
##vote: snickers

Snickers, if you're town, sorry bro. Just cost us the game.

On July 21 2014 14:09 IAmRobik wrote:
For the record, if any town votes me, we lose the game

On July 21 2014 18:06 Holyflare wrote:
Just to justify it so it seems like you aren't being aimlessly +1'd. You were very very dismissive of everyone's explanations and motives and reasoning. Just because someone may say something that contains bad logic or doesn't seem to make sense from your perspective doesn't mean it doesn't from their disgruntled town perspective. I didn't really follow this game but everytime i checked it was you breaking down sentences from posts on why they were so wrong which isn't necessarily what you should be doing.

On July 21 2014 18:34 Holyflare wrote:


Who would say that. Angry people because the game turned out stupid or mafia because the game turned out stupid and they are winning?

On July 18 2014 04:40 Snickers wrote:
Robik- Did not reread his filter but the feel I get is his town play. I think with four votes on him, mafia robik would not care about the game and just leave. (maybe he saw it as an opportunity to look townie) I will read into him later but I am worried he has not called me scum yet.

Kush-Scum, I will post a case with an explanation of my points later. If you are a good player you could read his filter and see he is scum without me guiding you. Hint: his defending posts are terrible.

Just a side note, I had this feeling right. The feeling I felt when me and bh were talking to a scum player late at night. I got the same feeling talking to kush last night. THE FEELING OF BULLSHIT.

Gobble- I do not see much usefulness in his posts (not many posts either) so I would fine lynching him today if it came down to it. After some more thought he looks extremely scummy.

List of his quotes that sit wrong with me.

"Obi and me vote him to see what happen" Ok so assumption and this also seems like a scum slip to me. (or was it not assumption because of the scum qt?)

"shut up Robik" I do not like seeing people trying to get others to stop talking with a mean tone (maybe his mean tone is to get Robik fired up and make the thread more disastrous)

Also he gets super defensive and accusing me of having no reason for calling him scum but he has no problem hoping on the Robik train for no reason to the point where robik was one away from hammer. This principle in his mind does not add up which is one thing I look for in scum.

Sylencia-So the way I see it currently. Talked about roles, first serious post is tied into with a post. Second serious post is tied with another vote. So to form his votes, he does not even raise questions. Scummy

Snickers-this guy is def scum because of his meta.

MM Want to hear more but I am getting a town vibe on him. Currently he is posting more in the thread.

Obi This guys filter has a high ratio of bullshit to helpful information. I think he scum.

Things that stick out.

His "motive for defending bh" post is terrible. This is explains his bad play more than alignment I think.

He lied with his 100% remark.

His reason for voting MM never even mentions how MM had two or less posts at that time. What the hell? Either not sincere or a ball player.

The more I look at it he looks more like a bad player than scum.


Damdred- His posts seem to have a scum mindset behind them. I could easily see myself posting what he is as scum.

Bh-Will look into him later.

So in short. People who I want to see more activity from or I will lynch the shit of them. Gobble, Sylencia, Obi, Damdred,

People who I want to see more info from but probably would not lycnh them if they afked for the rest of day one. MM

If anybody has any questions about this post or any of my other posts I will answer in 100% detail.

Also your an idiot if you do not think my initial posts did not produce activity.

On July 21 2014 18:14 Snickers wrote:
I probably would not tho . I saw scum slips and or terrible reasoning from both robik and damdred. Also talked about willing to throw the game/ Actually did throw the game.

Unless gg and sylencia completely threw.

On July 22 2014 05:55 iamperfection wrote:
a 9 man setup by itself is very uncomfortable for scum to play in. If you have a couple townies playing well it gets very hard to find mislynches. You make it overly complicated with these blue shenanigans just play it straight up.

On July 21 2014 17:00 Sylencia wrote:
##vote snickers

Idk, I've seen Robik as being more town as you this game, I can't see him being scum this game so I'm more inclined to trust his read tbh.