|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 21 2014 18:09 Snickers wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 18:06 Holyflare wrote:
Just to justify it so it seems like you aren't being aimlessly +1'd. You were very very dismissive of everyone's explanations and motives and reasoning. Just because someone may say something that contains bad logic or doesn't seem to make sense from your perspective doesn't mean it doesn't from their disgruntled town perspective. I didn't really follow this game but everytime i checked it was you breaking down sentences from posts on why they were so wrong which isn't necessarily what you should be doing. I laid off kush day one when I saw no one else going for him so I improved at least a little. What should I be doing then? And I like being critical. And town should try not to slip so much damn. Town=lynch scum/not lookie scummy.
I think it's more a question of being open to every scenario and every perspective rather than dismissive and accusatory. Although I can't blame you, everyone seemed pretty hostile :p
|
On July 20 2014 16:46 gobbledydook wrote:+ Show Spoiler +First I don't think snickers and damdred are both mafia and making a show out of it. If they were both mafia, they wouldn't attack each other and give town a chance to lynch them. So at most 1 of them can be mafia.
What damdred did:
he defends robik's rng lynch, gives some excuse for being inactive, then accuses snickers of being scummy because he doesn't respond directly to questions. Then he votes BH for not having any read other than rng. BH dies right before he could unvote, day 2 he hammers MM1, then day 3 is damdred twisting himself hard to apologize for lynching 2 towns.
Here's my take on what damdred's thinking:
damdred the scum wanted some town cred, so he makes the obvious defense of robik, forgoing the chance to hammer him day 1 as it would be very suspicious. Snicker attacks his lack of contribution, and damdred gives an excuse, anniversary with wife etc. We don't know if that was actually true, so let's assume it was the case and damdred was indeed busy. Then, feeling the need to 'contribute', he looks at the person who last attacked him, looks through his filter, and picks holes in it. Unfortunately the snickers bandwagon doesn't work and seeing a promising BH bandwagon hops on it with little explanation. He puts unvote after the hammer has hit to earn towncred for attempting to thwart the mislynch.
Day 2 he hammers MM1 because it's a mislynch for the taking.
Day 3, snickers presses him on the BH vote and MM1 vote. Now feeling that snickers is on to something, he tries to defend himself and apologise and bend over himself, but snickers smells scum and he panics.
The impression is that he's only writing when being pressured, and otherwise trying to lay low.
I'm not going to vote yet, I want to hear more from everyone first.
It looked like you realized that something was very wrong with this post and you might have moved over to GG eventually but then robik came and shat on everything.
|
I probably would not tho  . I saw scum slips and or terrible reasoning from both robik and damdred. Also talked about willing to throw the game/ Actually did throw the game.
Unless gg and sylencia completely threw.
|
scumslips are almost universally useless, and are almost never a good heuristic for finding mafia.
|
Ok but bad reasoning and willingness to throw the game? Slips are def something I consider if someone is doing other scummy stuff.
|
That is not a scumslip. A scumslip is usually when scum offhandedly call someone town by mistake.
|
W/e they are called, stop using bad reasoning and doing erratic things. Then I agree scum slips are useless if that is what they are.
|
And I was not saying those were scum slips
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 21 2014 18:14 Snickers wrote:I probably would not tho . I saw scum slips and or terrible reasoning from both robik and damdred. Also talked about willing to throw the game/ Actually did throw the game.Unless gg and sylencia completely threw.
not mafia attributes in general unless you're being incredibly superficial
mafia don't justify their votes by saying they want to throw the game. they just don't.
|
|
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 21 2014 18:19 Snickers wrote:
Ok but bad reasoning and willingness to throw the game? Slips are def something I consider if someone is doing other scummy stuff.
Who would say that. Angry people because the game turned out stupid or mafia because the game turned out stupid and they are winning?
|
I am taking a break. haha, I have a favorite classical song but never knew the name of it. I only know the first few minutes of it and have been searching.
and at marv. Well then I have no clue what to look for. Looking at the vote, I saw them scum. Thier reasoning did not add up. What am I suppose to do when people are literally throwing the game then? Just let them throw it? Its a catch 22. I guess I should do nothing next time. Like seriously do whatever I need to do not to get banned and not waste my time. Not trying to sound like an emotional idiot here.
|
On July 21 2014 18:34 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 18:19 Snickers wrote:
Ok but bad reasoning and willingness to throw the game? Slips are def something I consider if someone is doing other scummy stuff. Who would say that. Angry people because the game turned out stupid or mafia because the game turned out stupid and they are winning?
It def does not help me see them as town. But they did not just say it. They also did it.
If I posted that I am throwing the game it would be wifom I guess? Idk. But actually "throwing" it.?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
this game was totes hilarious though.
|
Not for me. I see it as a small learning experience covered with bullshit so its hard to see. Then a waste of time.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 21 2014 18:39 Snickers wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 18:34 Holyflare wrote:On July 21 2014 18:19 Snickers wrote:
Ok but bad reasoning and willingness to throw the game? Slips are def something I consider if someone is doing other scummy stuff. Who would say that. Angry people because the game turned out stupid or mafia because the game turned out stupid and they are winning? It def does not help me see them as town. But they did not just say it. They also did it. If I posted that I am throwing the game it would be wifom I guess? Idk. But actually "throwing" it.?
Mafia generally aren't that in your face and outspoken :p
Either way you played pretty much fine for what this game was. Seeing as you were like the only name I saw when i opened the thread each time it should have been obvious you were trying to figure things out to other people.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Also kush fu. Your sig screws up mobile version.
|
On July 21 2014 18:45 Holyflare wrote:
Also kush fu. Your sig screws up mobile version.
it screws up all versions
|
Anyway, experts:
how do I slip less as scum?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 21 2014 19:13 gobbledydook wrote:
Anyway, experts:
how do I slip less as scum?
you played ok, even though kush caught you. best thing to do is just look at why people called you mafia and don't do it anymore :p
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
