Glory Seeker Mini Mafia - Page 19

On May 05 2014 18:32 thrawn2112 wrote:
hey guys whats up. i have nothing to contribute atm. but i am down to chat

On May 05 2014 19:06 thrawn2112 wrote:
yeah i'm so so town. next question.

On May 06 2014 08:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
booom boom boom.

Mderg is scum too ok for sure.

Vivax was metaing me and all that so Im meh. I dont think Im playing too different from my scum games though. Although he isnt saying that I wasnt lying, hes saying that I didnt explain myself in a 'townie' way.

Im just baffled at the amount of nonsense you say to the thread apparently believing in it.

lying to lynch someone is fine. I wouldnt lie as scum though, too easy to get caught out.

On May 05 2014 18:43 Koshi wrote:

What do you make of Steve?

On May 05 2014 19:10 Koshi wrote:

Who is the most scummy Oats or Holyflare?

On May 05 2014 22:07 Koshi wrote:
on another note

Hi mderg!

On May 06 2014 07:40 Koshi wrote:
Time to sleep.

Poofter fill in 8 names:

towniest town that towned:
Leaning town:
Leaning scum:
Scummiest scummer that scummed:

On May 06 2014 06:17 Vivax wrote:
I just wanted to know more about that post. What was serious and whatnot, hence I find it quite a bit of overreaction from Cava to give me "super suspicion" and say I'm twisting things cause I stated my thoughts about his post (upon request!) without even being judgmental about him.

It's not like I'm sure about his alignment yet, neither about Holyflare's, but the latter seems to follow a very aggressive approach to the game and that gives me neg vibes. Anyway gonna give some of my thoughts about the two now.

If you're town and look at the posts I made about Cava, think for a moment how you would see them and suggest how you would react if you were in the place of Cava (who never showed a sign of wanting to vote for me). Would you instacall me scum and say i'm twisting or try to make clear it was a full joke post and that you think it's actually townie?

Cause I don't call him scum, I don't say he's twisting things, I simply say that I found his post defensive, giving a reason for something that in his eyes should be trivial since it stems from a joke, a reason that at the same time allows him to not give a read on me (hence evasive).

He doesn't have to agree with the same logic, but does the logic I use at the same time make me scum for using it? That pattern of thinking is missing in Cava's response as I see other people being able to at least understand my point of view, of which I don't claim that it constitutes ultimately damning evidence.

Regarding HF a lot is cause of the reasons he's pushing Oats with. Oats sometimes gets misunderstood or misreads or doesn't make something incredibly clear, so pointing out inconsistencies and calling his mistakes or wrong representations lies, as in scummy lies shouldn't be applied while it could be applied to a player who doesn't make such mistakes as town often.

With Oats you have to is look at his attitude. He's really passive as mafia and in your face as town as I think that is the case in this game. I know it's very subjective (I think LXI and Doctor Who 1 he was scum and I played with him) but maybe somebody else can confirm (Koshi and thrawn maybe can) but I feel confident to say he shouldn't be lynched today.

On May 06 2014 07:32 Cavalinho wrote:


I think a combination of tone and a logical leap (asking more about a post that others have found relatively towny because I didn't include you in it) made me think less of you at the time. The only thing I really don't like about this post is that I feel like you're martyring yourself by saying "wtf Cav thinks I'm scummy how dare he."

I still don't understand why you would expect me to give a read of you based off of nothing. I don't feel like any of my reads are relatively strong with the exception of HF, and even then I wouldn't put money on what I currently think of him. If I even had to give anyone a read on you right now...I'd say it's rather null for the moment. I don't think "suspicious" warrants the same response as "I'm going to vote you and push you until you die." There's a clear difference between the two, and I feel like this post was made, in part, to make me look bad.

Maybe I'm overreacting, maybe I'm not. I don't really know what to think of you yet. I think you're null...For the moment.

On May 06 2014 00:26 mderg wrote:
I don´t understand your play right now, Oatsmaster. Why would you state something as fact, if you have no idea about it?

On May 06 2014 01:53 mderg wrote:
I still think Oats play was shit, he might be scum but that´s too big of a tell for just one stupid case.

On May 06 2014 09:12 mderg wrote:

I was about to post that I don´t agree with holy on you being scum, you made a bad case but in no way did you lie "to get a towny lynched by any means possible". I´d just call it a bad case based on wrong meta. Incidentally Holy made a case on me in cell mini mafia, also backed up with bad meta reasoning. He was town btw.

I don´t like this post, though. What´s with "Mderg is scum too ok for sure."? Some explanation would be good.

Lying to lynch someone is imo only fine in very few cases. Not with a weak case like yours, though.

On May 05 2014 23:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
I did say that reason. Are you not paying attention Holyflare?
The reason why i said that meta stuff is because it sounded nice and I had no way to check.