|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 08:38 Paperscraps wrote: !ride the enjoy and on hop all us Let .better much so seems wagon marvellosity new This
If I could vote you twice I would
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 08:45 Amiko wrote: @Blazinghand: Is your vote on paperscraps pure policy?
?about dishonest being is Blazinghand think you do What :@Paperscraps
?so do to willing be you would wording your reversing stop to this like you ask I If :@Paperscraps No
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
at one point balla was in this game you know gumshoe
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
>"bh's entry is unusually bad, this makes him scum" >"let's lynch him" >am town
mfw every game I play in this happens at the start
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
here's where I am in thread reading status, iamp and VE
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
yeah honestly i'm still in the process of catching up but i'm very very comfortable with where my vote is now. i'll keep you in the loop as the situation develops
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:52 WaveofShadow wrote: I don't find your reason to vote him any stronger than any of the other 'easy' cases atm, including the 'replacement case' on you that I'm a part of. In fact, the case against you has gained more resistance while a whole bunch of people were pretty damn quick to jump aboard paperscraps as soon as it came up.
It doesn't sit right with me, especially in light of his continued insistence to play the way he has---doesn't look like scum tactics to me. I will concede that his post calling you scum doesn't look particularly good, but I don't think it's the sole thing that proves him scum, which is what everyone voting him is currently relying on.
is "you" in this post referring to me?
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:52 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 15:48 Blazinghand wrote: yeah honestly i'm still in the process of catching up but i'm very very comfortable with where my vote is now. i'll keep you in the loop as the situation develops wow so useful blazinghand.
I've already caught one scum so far in ps, give me a break i can catch like one scum per 24 hours at maxspeed bro
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
you are aware that like, my case having resistance and the paperscraps case not having quite as much isn't evidence i'm scum. in fact, it's evidence i'm town since most people seem to agree with me and not your case
like if you see people agreeing with you, that doesn't cause you to re-evaluate usually unless they're all lurkey scummy people right, so that's evidence you're right. but then if peopel disagree, clearly that's evidence your target is scum?? ._.
re the second part of your post, is "he" paperscraps?
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:56 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 15:55 Blazinghand wrote:On April 04 2014 15:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 04 2014 15:48 Blazinghand wrote: yeah honestly i'm still in the process of catching up but i'm very very comfortable with where my vote is now. i'll keep you in the loop as the situation develops wow so useful blazinghand. I've already caught one scum so far in ps, give me a break i can catch like one scum per 24 hours at maxspeed bro you got a scum on the line, but you arent doing anything to reel him in.
well apparently everyone likes my case so we're set
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 16:03 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 15:57 Blazinghand wrote: you are aware that like, my case having resistance and the paperscraps case not having quite as much isn't evidence i'm scum. in fact, it's evidence i'm town since most people seem to agree with me and not your case
like if you see people agreeing with you, that doesn't cause you to re-evaluate usually unless they're all lurkey scummy people right, so that's evidence you're right. but then if peopel disagree, clearly that's evidence your target is scum?? ._.
re the second part of your post, is "he" paperscraps? No it's not evidence you're scum, but that's not why I'm voting you---and you'd know that if you've read, which you haven't. People agreeing with you isn't evidence you're town either. Hmm actually now that I look at it, nobody is voting paperscraps anymore aside from you and Amiko. I have more people voting for you right now, so is that evidence I'm town according to your logic? The people agreeing with me aren't lurky/scummy people, they're iamp and Oats. Amiko is lurky. Care to re-evaluate based on this info?
i'm nto saying the opposite is true. you're running around saying "a high level of T makes you smart" and i'm like "no that's false" and you can't retort saying "so a low level of T makes you smart?!"
i'm just saying your logic is badzoes
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 16:13 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 16:11 Blazinghand wrote:On April 04 2014 16:03 WaveofShadow wrote:On April 04 2014 15:57 Blazinghand wrote: you are aware that like, my case having resistance and the paperscraps case not having quite as much isn't evidence i'm scum. in fact, it's evidence i'm town since most people seem to agree with me and not your case
like if you see people agreeing with you, that doesn't cause you to re-evaluate usually unless they're all lurkey scummy people right, so that's evidence you're right. but then if peopel disagree, clearly that's evidence your target is scum?? ._.
re the second part of your post, is "he" paperscraps? No it's not evidence you're scum, but that's not why I'm voting you---and you'd know that if you've read, which you haven't. People agreeing with you isn't evidence you're town either. Hmm actually now that I look at it, nobody is voting paperscraps anymore aside from you and Amiko. I have more people voting for you right now, so is that evidence I'm town according to your logic? The people agreeing with me aren't lurky/scummy people, they're iamp and Oats. Amiko is lurky. Care to re-evaluate based on this info? i'm nto saying the opposite is true. you're running around saying "a high level of T makes you smart" and i'm like "no that's false" and you can't retort saying "so a low level of T makes you smart?!" i'm just saying your logic is badzoes Ok great, but that accomplishes nothing because as I said, it's not why I'm voting for you in the first place.
it doesn't matter, i'm just pointing out a way you're wrong because when people are wrong it bothers me deep down in the base of my soul
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
good night, WoS! Get lots of sleep and stay healthy :3
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 16:36 VayneAuthority wrote: My role is anti-town to clarify. and narcissistic. I wasn't going to get night killed anyway so I dont see any harm in revealing this
do you have the power to convert townies to your alignment
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 16:39 VayneAuthority wrote:righto ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/5EGSy55.jpg) and no BH but if thats the power level you are comparing to then dayum son
i haven't lied about my role!
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 17:55 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 17:54 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 17:53 Koshi wrote: Holyflare bro. I can kill the marv. But in the most antitown way possible. dont dayvig bro :D it's more antitown.  Now I'm curious, please share.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 21:11 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 20:31 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 20:29 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 04 2014 20:26 Holyflare wrote: i never said i had a town read on va? i just don't have a scum read on va Then why are you defending him with bad arguments? Isnt it beter to see how he reacts since you dont have a read on him? How is anything more game relevant than trying to get someone lynched????? because if he's not reading the thread why would talking about va getting lynched do anything? he either finds gems in filter diving people and points them out to us or he doesn't and we CAN lynch him there are way more things to talk about oats, stop talking about this -.- Its like 12 hours to lynch, and you are still pussyfooting around. Wow. Paper might be scum but then why is BH bussing him? Oh right maybe because BH not dying is better. hmm.
>realizes BH is right all along >still doesn't want to admit i'm town
mfw
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 21:45 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 21:42 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 21:39 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 04 2014 21:35 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 21:34 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 04 2014 21:22 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 21:11 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 04 2014 20:31 Holyflare wrote:On April 04 2014 20:29 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 04 2014 20:26 Holyflare wrote: i never said i had a town read on va? i just don't have a scum read on va Then why are you defending him with bad arguments? Isnt it beter to see how he reacts since you dont have a read on him? How is anything more game relevant than trying to get someone lynched????? because if he's not reading the thread why would talking about va getting lynched do anything? he either finds gems in filter diving people and points them out to us or he doesn't and we CAN lynch him there are way more things to talk about oats, stop talking about this -.- Its like 12 hours to lynch, and you are still pussyfooting around. Wow. Paper might be scum but then why is BH bussing him? Oh right maybe because BH not dying is better. hmm. Not really I give a reason to counter your argument that he is scum . I'm not saying he isn't I'm saying he has reasons to do this as town.... Paper scraps best lynch whatever man. Bleh all these sketchy dudes hopping on this paper lynch. Makes me feel ill. are you seriously saying you don't agree here? you don't outline ANYONE sketchy and your only contribution right now to this situation is va being mafia when evidence suggests that he could also be town HOlyflare on this. Amiko on this BH on this. Dude how is this not sketchy? And the VA thing is totally not town VA, there is 0 evidence suggesting he is town and many evidence suggesting he is scum. So, you have 3 sketchy people on this lynch. Yet you don't try and push any of those 3 sketchy people for a lynch, instead, you just complain there are sketchy people on a person that makes reads that don't add up, as proven just now? You then talk more about VA, who COULD be town or COULD be scum than your scummy looking people rather than talking about the person of conversation at the time? Why are you being so weird oats? Instead I push my stronger reads. What now Holyflare? And I did push BH until VA started claiming scum.
>pushing BH >"VA started claiming scum" >voting for someone who is neither BH nor VA
|
|
|
|