On April 06 2014 07:57 yamato77 wrote: Blazing reminds me of himself from the last big numbered game where I played with him and got him lynched. As in, he's town and just trying to not get lynched. Can't really read into it any more than that except that his only read is paperscraps and I'm not quite sold on that guy being mafia.
Or like hogwarts where he was scum with little time
I'm still ok just lynching the slot for earlier reasons. BH is capable of playing the way he has as both alignments.
I honestly don't know. I can't trust the guy at all, like ever, especially after Cultured so it's always going to be in the back of my mind in every game unfortunately. Considering the ending of Cultured was probably largely my fault I don't think I'm the person to go to for this.
In any case there are more obvious and likely targets before him.
Also was watching random Youtube videos and I was reminded of this... Surely when that cat picture was posted earlier in the pregame in regards to CATASTROPHE they meant to post this.
I honestly don't know. I can't trust the guy at all, like ever, especially after Cultured so it's always going to be in the back of my mind in every game unfortunately. Considering the ending of Cultured was probably largely my fault I don't think I'm the person to go to for this.
In any case there are more obvious and likely targets before him.
Also was watching random Youtube videos and I was reminded of this... Surely when that cat picture was posted earlier in the pregame in regards to CATASTROPHE they meant to post this.
On April 06 2014 07:48 WaveofShadow wrote: Is poofter bad? I get that newbie vibe from him. Which according to my usual thoughts/reads means we should lynch this fucking guy with fire.
I'm new to forums but have played a lot of video mafia (I think I've addressed that before) first game this big. I'm better than Joey and Robik at video mafia but they maybe better than me at forum same for paperscraps.
I played in Titanic recently and was town if you want to read that filter.
My question is you're getting the newbie vibe so newbie=lynch cause mafia? Just clarifying a bit.
You don't need to understand. You just need to lay down and die.
Egh. I don't think things worked out how i wanted, but the kill list means we're likely dealing with a team afraid of marv/Foolishness/etc (read: TL mafia 'vets') despite the fact that foolishness hadn't done a great deal and keirathi and kita weren't at the absolute height of possible usefulness thus far.
HF good call on LXIV, wish it could make me trust you.
I'm going to assume Djo will be modkilled today, so I'm going to start with BH. He fits the bill as described above, as well as earlier reasons.
I'd like to hear a bunch from sandro on that matter. I trust him a little more than you atm. I'll sheep him if he says to switch but for now I REALLY think BH needs to go. Man what did town even do last night? This is going to be a real fucking uphill battle from now on. We're down what, like 6 of the strongest town members possible?
I will add him to my ever growing list of "obv mafia". Djodref, sandroba, VayneAuthority, Hopeless1der. Unfortunatly there just seems to be too many "obv mafia" for all of them to be mafia
justanothertownie - Active without saying much. I always like to say one of the easiest ways (if you have the time) to play as a mafia member is to be very active and be the 'town discussion leader'. You get to ask a lot of questions, and make it seem like you are contirbuting without saying much yourself. To me, JAT's filter is a classic example of this. It consist of so many one line responses or questions to other players, although he has an 8 page filter, I can count the amount of times he wrote more than two lines with my fingers
But JAT just plays this way! I want you to compare this to his town play in Foundation Mafia. Yes he is active, but notice that he actually has posts with more than two lines. It also contains direct accusations of scums and his own opinions.
And your Third Party Reminder Amiko - Claimed Third Party Bulletproof Survivor. Amiko has a little too much setup related talk which makes me suspcious of him. However Amiko is new and I would be hypocritical if I said that playing setup focus is mafia. Unfortunatly I really don't want to waste a lynch on this, so if any of the vigs would like to policy kill amiko I would be greatful
You're playing terribly on purpose right now, aren't you?
As long as djo is eliminated somehow and scumBH's bomb goes off that's mostly fine with me. Except for VE And Iamp And you do know you're on that list right koshi?
Not to entertain thoughts of HF being scum but the thread is incredibly dead for a day with double-lynch. I'm going to assume there's lots of behind-the-scenes communicado, but at some point we're gonna have to bring voting and shnizz back in here.
Koshi assuming it was you who did activate this, I'm assuming you have two lynches in mind?
Welcome to Aperture Mafia 2: Episode 2! You are Edward Elric, the Fullmetal Alchemist! You understand the law of equivalent exchange: that in order to create something, you must first give up something of equal value. For every vote on you and the player playing Alphonse Elric, You have an extra antivote (not your regular vote) for that amount. This total can only be placed on one player, and may not be place on yourself or Alphonse. It will go into effect at the lynch. PM the hosts the name of the player to use this antivote. You also may not vote for yourself or Alphonse. You are masoned with Alphonse, know that he shares your win condition, and may communicate here: http://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/47CusBMYf6Bwu. If Alphonse dies, you will be given the option to give up all your abilities to resurrect Alphonse that coming phase. If you and Alphonse both vote for the same person an extra vote will be placed on that person. You win when either you or Alphonse has survived until the endgame.
"This pain's nothing...compared to what he's given up..."
Now obviously the resurrecting and whatnot is directly related to wincon, but the antivotes part is a bit of a stetch. On top of that I think VE's (he was Alphonse) ability was even less 'survivor-oriented.'
On April 07 2014 02:08 WaveofShadow wrote: My role PM from the most recent Aperture:
Welcome to Aperture Mafia 2: Episode 2! You are Edward Elric, the Fullmetal Alchemist! You understand the law of equivalent exchange: that in order to create something, you must first give up something of equal value. For every vote on you and the player playing Alphonse Elric, You have an extra antivote (not your regular vote) for that amount. This total can only be placed on one player, and may not be place on yourself or Alphonse. It will go into effect at the lynch. PM the hosts the name of the player to use this antivote. You also may not vote for yourself or Alphonse. You are masoned with Alphonse, know that he shares your win condition, and may communicate here: http://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/47CusBMYf6Bwu. If Alphonse dies, you will be given the option to give up all your abilities to resurrect Alphonse that coming phase. If you and Alphonse both vote for the same person an extra vote will be placed on that person. You win when either you or Alphonse has survived until the endgame.
"This pain's nothing...compared to what he's given up..."
Now obviously the resurrecting and whatnot is directly related to wincon, but the antivotes part is a bit of a stetch. On top of that I think VE's (he was Alphonse) ability was even less 'survivor-oriented.'
Does this not sound really similar to the sort of horsemen situation? They are masoned together and probably win if they make it to end game or some shit.
No horsemen are probably linked by name and QT only. These games always have a cell of some sort of people with differing alignments within.