|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:09 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar you just need to vote for thrawn. still haven't heard why you wrote ahahaha I'll be honest with you because you keep bringing this up again and again.  I don't need to convince anyone but marv because he is the one who will be listened to anyways. So i am waiting for him to come here.
why not just post it so we can all read it...?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:14 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:09 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar you just need to vote for thrawn. still haven't heard why you wrote ahahaha I'll be honest with you because you keep bringing this up again and again. I don't need to convince anyone but marv because he is the one who will be listened to anyways. So i am waiting for him to come here. why not just post it so we can all read it...? Because it doesn't mean shit. Why would i want to convince someone who is acting dumb and still has his vote on me despite agreeing with me on my lynch target? Or someone who has a case on me and who i think is mafia? The only people i can now convince are people who think i am mafia, and i don't give a fuck about people who think i am mafia. Noone else has said what they do think about my case so they don't need convincing (as they have not said they disagree). I would rather convince other people, like marv who can sway every single vote.
my vote location is irrelevant, i obviously have come around to your idea of thrawn because i spent time checking his post to see if it add up which it didn't so stop being a dick again and explain it marv has eyes he will see it regardless of where you post it
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
you don't even know his alignment either, unless you are implying you do
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
what the hell do you mean by "this is way too absolute"?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:40 phagga wrote:
Holyflare: rayn is always and under every circumstance gonna value your opinion/ability higher than thrawns.
well that is true?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:42 phagga wrote:
Is it? That would surprise me. So do you agree with thrawns argument there?
yes he even linked evidence to say why he thought that
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:40 phagga wrote:
Holyflare: rayn is always and under every circumstance gonna value your opinion/ability higher than thrawns. No necessarily true.
well no not 100% of the time but thrawn doesn't say that to be the case
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
phagga looking weird for picking out these reasons for thrawn being mafia though
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
because he defends you for not explaining your reasons when I ask and has eventually town read you but then uses the same argument for thrawn who is then mafia after you already explained your reasons and my reasons why he might be mafia
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:48 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:46 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:40 phagga wrote:
Holyflare: rayn is always and under every circumstance gonna value your opinion/ability higher than thrawns. No necessarily true. well no not 100% of the time but thrawn doesn't say that to be the case But he never considers the possibility of it not being true.
what...? he says you'd value holy's opinion the majority of the time over mine which is mostly true, he never talks in absolutes?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:43 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:42 phagga wrote:
Is it? That would surprise me. So do you agree with thrawns argument there? yes he even linked evidence to say why he thought that That "evidence" is a pile of shit. If a random noob makes more sense than marv i value their opinion more than marv's. That's a pile of shit because everyone who has any idea of how i play does not buy that shit thrawn says as town, not even he himself.
well no it's not a "pile of shit" it's you categorically stating that you follow my reads because bussing/right and then also stating that thrawn is a noob sooo no it's not a pile of shit
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:50 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:48 phagga wrote:On March 26 2014 18:46 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:40 phagga wrote:
Holyflare: rayn is always and under every circumstance gonna value your opinion/ability higher than thrawns. No necessarily true. well no not 100% of the time but thrawn doesn't say that to be the case But he never considers the possibility of it not being true. what...? he says you'd value holy's opinion the majority of the time over mine which is mostly true, he never talks in absolutes? Yes and that's not true and everyone knows that, including you and thrawn. Unless you have no idea how i play which i don't believe.
i'm not fucking defending thrawn here jesus christ, i'm saying that with the evidence thrawn linked it LOOKS true so why is phagga using it as a case for thrawn being mafia when the evidence suggests that it is in fact true based on what thrawn linked
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:51 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:43 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:42 phagga wrote:
Is it? That would surprise me. So do you agree with thrawns argument there? yes he even linked evidence to say why he thought that That "evidence" is a pile of shit. If a random noob makes more sense than marv i value their opinion more than marv's. That's a pile of shit because everyone who has any idea of how i play does not buy that shit thrawn says as town, not even he himself. well no it's not a "pile of shit" it's you categorically stating that you follow my reads because bussing/right and then also stating that thrawn is a noob sooo no it's not a pile of shit IF YOU REALLY THINK I WAS SERIOUS IN WHAT I SAID IN THE BEGINNING OF TITANIC GAME YOU ARE AN IDIOT. LITERALLY AN IDIOT. or mafia.
you are skipping my posts and making it look like i am defending thrawn like a retard
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:50 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:48 phagga wrote:On March 26 2014 18:46 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:40 phagga wrote:
Holyflare: rayn is always and under every circumstance gonna value your opinion/ability higher than thrawns. No necessarily true. well no not 100% of the time but thrawn doesn't say that to be the case But he never considers the possibility of it not being true. what...? he says you'd value holy's opinion the majority of the time over mine which is mostly true, he never talks in absolutes? Yes and that's not true and everyone knows that, including you and thrawn. Unless you have no idea how i play which i don't believe. i'm not fucking defending thrawn here jesus christ, i'm saying that with the evidence thrawn linked it LOOKS true so why is phagga using it as a case for thrawn being mafia when the evidence suggests that it is in fact true based on what thrawn linked because it is not true and it doesn't even have anything to do with what thrawn says. It is an instance where thrawn was really stupid but that does not mean i think he will always be that stupid. rofl.
YES YOU KNOW THAT BUT HOW DOES PHAGGA
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
he has 2 points on thrawn
1) thrawn's point on rayn is "too absolute" which isn't the case if he read the meta that thrawn linked as reasoning because to anyone outside you or thrawn or me it looks solid
2) didn't ask for reasoning - which is semi legit but was already posted by you ages ago
so his read is overlyjustified and based on something that he didn't read (point 1) and something that he sheeped if he read the thread (point 2), all he had to say was "i agree with rayn or hf" or w/e and it would be fine but he wrote a wall of text like that to say what already had been said
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 19:00 Holyflare wrote:
he has 2 points on thrawn
1) thrawn's point on rayn is "too absolute" which isn't the case if he read the meta that thrawn linked as reasoning because to anyone outside you or thrawn or me it looks solid
2) didn't ask for reasoning - which is semi legit but was already posted by you ages ago
so his read is overlyjustified and based on something that he didn't read (point 1) and something that he sheeped if he read the thread (point 2), all he had to say was "i agree with rayn or hf" or w/e and it would be fine but he wrote a wall of text like that to say what already had been said Regarding 1, I still see it as a valid point. And what do you mean with "because to anyone outside you or thrawn or me it looks solid"? I don't get what you want so say with this. Regarding 2, you mean this post, right? I missed that, my fault.
Number 1 is because thrawn EXPLAINS why he thinks like that with a quote from titanic and obs qt posts from another game which to anyone that isn't rayn or thrawn or me (you don't know what happened or anything) looks like a legitimate thing to say and if you had read it you would be unassuming and accept that as the blind truth.
So why didn't you?
Number 2 is rayn talking about thrawn not asking questions about his town read which he stated numerous times but you made extremely lengthy
so in total your first reason for voting thrawn is something that shows that you have not read the game or your scum read and the second reason implies you are sheeping without reading the game or you are writing at length about points that were already said
which is quite scummy
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
This is a game of two truths and i lie.
freudian slip man, i isn't even near 1!
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 19:25 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 14:22 Holyflare wrote:
2 mafia so easy? Palmar rayn gg. Belt remains. Can you not play like this this game? It'll get annoying quite fast.
yes well i tried not to and then rayn was an arrogant sod that laid a "trap" to get reactions out of other people
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
3 posts till 20k marv make it a good one
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 19:36 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 15:19 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 15:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Also the things you said about Robik are hilarious.
I am more interested in what other people think about all this. There is nothing i want to discuss with you. Please point out to me where it is wrong. He has read 1 or 2 games of you as mafia and 1 of those is foundation where you yourself said that the game was shit and totally not your meta so in actuality he has read 1 game of mafia from you. He has read 0 town games. He calls out something about smiley's which didn't happen in any of your scum games that I looked at and seeing as he has read 0 of your town games how does he know you do not do that as town? You defend robik and say everything is shit and boo hoo i don't want to talk to holy anymore. You so funny. I don't know if you dropped this later, but you're pressing this way too hard. It seems extremely obvious to me that Robik is the type of player who will leap to hard conclusions off little to no evidence (correctly or incorrectly). I have no idea why you'd think what he's doing is outside of his normal remit
because i had never played with him and it's retarded and rayn knew it was retarded and didn't bother to point it out and just said "shit logic" "u bad" when all he had to do was do what you just did and point out that i was wrong to assume something like that, he perpetuated the argument by antagonising me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
