|
On March 26 2014 18:51 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:43 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:42 phagga wrote:
Is it? That would surprise me. So do you agree with thrawns argument there? yes he even linked evidence to say why he thought that That "evidence" is a pile of shit. If a random noob makes more sense than marv i value their opinion more than marv's. That's a pile of shit because everyone who has any idea of how i play does not buy that shit thrawn says as town, not even he himself. well no it's not a "pile of shit" it's you categorically stating that you follow my reads because bussing/right and then also stating that thrawn is a noob sooo no it's not a pile of shit
IF YOU REALLY THINK I WAS SERIOUS IN WHAT I SAID IN THE BEGINNING OF TITANIC GAME YOU ARE AN IDIOT. LITERALLY AN IDIOT. or mafia.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:50 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:48 phagga wrote:On March 26 2014 18:46 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:40 phagga wrote:
Holyflare: rayn is always and under every circumstance gonna value your opinion/ability higher than thrawns. No necessarily true. well no not 100% of the time but thrawn doesn't say that to be the case But he never considers the possibility of it not being true. what...? he says you'd value holy's opinion the majority of the time over mine which is mostly true, he never talks in absolutes? Yes and that's not true and everyone knows that, including you and thrawn. Unless you have no idea how i play which i don't believe.
i'm not fucking defending thrawn here jesus christ, i'm saying that with the evidence thrawn linked it LOOKS true so why is phagga using it as a case for thrawn being mafia when the evidence suggests that it is in fact true based on what thrawn linked
|
This game is painful to read
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:51 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:43 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:42 phagga wrote:
Is it? That would surprise me. So do you agree with thrawns argument there? yes he even linked evidence to say why he thought that That "evidence" is a pile of shit. If a random noob makes more sense than marv i value their opinion more than marv's. That's a pile of shit because everyone who has any idea of how i play does not buy that shit thrawn says as town, not even he himself. well no it's not a "pile of shit" it's you categorically stating that you follow my reads because bussing/right and then also stating that thrawn is a noob sooo no it's not a pile of shit IF YOU REALLY THINK I WAS SERIOUS IN WHAT I SAID IN THE BEGINNING OF TITANIC GAME YOU ARE AN IDIOT. LITERALLY AN IDIOT. or mafia.
you are skipping my posts and making it look like i am defending thrawn like a retard
|
On March 26 2014 18:54 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:50 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:48 phagga wrote:On March 26 2014 18:46 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:40 phagga wrote:
Holyflare: rayn is always and under every circumstance gonna value your opinion/ability higher than thrawns. No necessarily true. well no not 100% of the time but thrawn doesn't say that to be the case But he never considers the possibility of it not being true. what...? he says you'd value holy's opinion the majority of the time over mine which is mostly true, he never talks in absolutes? Yes and that's not true and everyone knows that, including you and thrawn. Unless you have no idea how i play which i don't believe. i'm not fucking defending thrawn here jesus christ, i'm saying that with the evidence thrawn linked it LOOKS true so why is phagga using it as a case for thrawn being mafia when the evidence suggests that it is in fact true based on what thrawn linked
because it is not true and it doesn't even have anything to do with what thrawn says.
It is an instance where thrawn was really stupid but that does not mean i think he will always be that stupid.
rofl.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 18:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:50 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:48 phagga wrote:On March 26 2014 18:46 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:40 phagga wrote:
Holyflare: rayn is always and under every circumstance gonna value your opinion/ability higher than thrawns. No necessarily true. well no not 100% of the time but thrawn doesn't say that to be the case But he never considers the possibility of it not being true. what...? he says you'd value holy's opinion the majority of the time over mine which is mostly true, he never talks in absolutes? Yes and that's not true and everyone knows that, including you and thrawn. Unless you have no idea how i play which i don't believe. i'm not fucking defending thrawn here jesus christ, i'm saying that with the evidence thrawn linked it LOOKS true so why is phagga using it as a case for thrawn being mafia when the evidence suggests that it is in fact true based on what thrawn linked because it is not true and it doesn't even have anything to do with what thrawn says. It is an instance where thrawn was really stupid but that does not mean i think he will always be that stupid. rofl.
YES YOU KNOW THAT BUT HOW DOES PHAGGA
|
Like what thrawn is saying there is:
"Look, here, rayn thought i was really stupid. Now this means he will never trust what i say and thais is the evidence kthxbye!!"
|
He says: "rayn I know that you have a lower opinion of my ability to read people than you do of HF's opinion. plus, calling holyflare "retarded like he was in las game" does not even make sense because last game holyflare caught mafia instantly
so you're givnig holyflare a town read based on a statement about his play last game which isn't accurate, and a "i think thrawn is smarter than HF so thrawn must be scum" argument when I know you repect HF's reads more than you do mine."
I interpreted it as
"You would never hold my opinion higher than Holyflares".
|
On March 26 2014 18:55 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:50 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:48 phagga wrote:On March 26 2014 18:46 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:40 phagga wrote:
Holyflare: rayn is always and under every circumstance gonna value your opinion/ability higher than thrawns. No necessarily true. well no not 100% of the time but thrawn doesn't say that to be the case But he never considers the possibility of it not being true. what...? he says you'd value holy's opinion the majority of the time over mine which is mostly true, he never talks in absolutes? Yes and that's not true and everyone knows that, including you and thrawn. Unless you have no idea how i play which i don't believe. i'm not fucking defending thrawn here jesus christ, i'm saying that with the evidence thrawn linked it LOOKS true so why is phagga using it as a case for thrawn being mafia when the evidence suggests that it is in fact true based on what thrawn linked because it is not true and it doesn't even have anything to do with what thrawn says. It is an instance where thrawn was really stupid but that does not mean i think he will always be that stupid. rofl. YES YOU KNOW THAT BUT HOW DOES PHAGGA
Apparently not because that's exactly what he is saying imo. 
|
On March 26 2014 18:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:55 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:50 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:48 phagga wrote:On March 26 2014 18:46 Holyflare wrote:On March 26 2014 18:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 18:40 phagga wrote:
Holyflare: rayn is always and under every circumstance gonna value your opinion/ability higher than thrawns. No necessarily true. well no not 100% of the time but thrawn doesn't say that to be the case But he never considers the possibility of it not being true. what...? he says you'd value holy's opinion the majority of the time over mine which is mostly true, he never talks in absolutes? Yes and that's not true and everyone knows that, including you and thrawn. Unless you have no idea how i play which i don't believe. i'm not fucking defending thrawn here jesus christ, i'm saying that with the evidence thrawn linked it LOOKS true so why is phagga using it as a case for thrawn being mafia when the evidence suggests that it is in fact true based on what thrawn linked because it is not true and it doesn't even have anything to do with what thrawn says. It is an instance where thrawn was really stupid but that does not mean i think he will always be that stupid. rofl. YES YOU KNOW THAT BUT HOW DOES PHAGGA Apparently not because that's exactly what he is saying imo.
EBWOP: I mean the opposite. phagga clearly does think thrawn's statement is shit. That's how i read it.
|
okay shower time. play nice kids.
also vote for thrawn and where did Palmar go, his appereance was really weak.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
he has 2 points on thrawn
1) thrawn's point on rayn is "too absolute" which isn't the case if he read the meta that thrawn linked as reasoning because to anyone outside you or thrawn or me it looks solid
2) didn't ask for reasoning - which is semi legit but was already posted by you ages ago
so his read is overlyjustified and based on something that he didn't read (point 1) and something that he sheeped if he read the thread (point 2), all he had to say was "i agree with rayn or hf" or w/e and it would be fine but he wrote a wall of text like that to say what already had been said
|
On March 26 2014 16:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:Holyflare staph. please just staph and sheep me to scumlynch.
not up to date yet but can you please never ever make another post like this again and just play mafia and stop being so haughty
|
On March 26 2014 18:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:okay shower time. play nice kids. also vote for thrawn and where did Palmar go, his appereance was really weak.
I'm wading through the pile of shit you and holyflare created.
|
On March 26 2014 19:01 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 18:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:okay shower time. play nice kids. also vote for thrawn and where did Palmar go, his appereance was really weak. I'm wading through the pile of shit you and holyflare created.
When you are done, if you think i created a pile of shit tell me how it is different from the "pile of shit" you and gumshoe created?
|
On March 26 2014 19:00 Holyflare wrote:
he has 2 points on thrawn
1) thrawn's point on rayn is "too absolute" which isn't the case if he read the meta that thrawn linked as reasoning because to anyone outside you or thrawn or me it looks solid
2) didn't ask for reasoning - which is semi legit but was already posted by you ages ago
so his read is overlyjustified and based on something that he didn't read (point 1) and something that he sheeped if he read the thread (point 2), all he had to say was "i agree with rayn or hf" or w/e and it would be fine but he wrote a wall of text like that to say what already had been said
Regarding 1, I still see it as a valid point. And what do you mean with "because to anyone outside you or thrawn or me it looks solid"? I don't get what you want so say with this.
Regarding 2, you mean this post, right? I missed that, my fault.
|
On March 26 2014 19:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 19:01 Palmar wrote:On March 26 2014 18:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:okay shower time. play nice kids. also vote for thrawn and where did Palmar go, his appereance was really weak. I'm wading through the pile of shit you and holyflare created. When you are done, if you think i created a pile of shit tell me how it is different from the "pile of shit" you and gumshoe created?
##Vote rayn
policy lynch for creating traps.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 26 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 19:00 Holyflare wrote:
he has 2 points on thrawn
1) thrawn's point on rayn is "too absolute" which isn't the case if he read the meta that thrawn linked as reasoning because to anyone outside you or thrawn or me it looks solid
2) didn't ask for reasoning - which is semi legit but was already posted by you ages ago
so his read is overlyjustified and based on something that he didn't read (point 1) and something that he sheeped if he read the thread (point 2), all he had to say was "i agree with rayn or hf" or w/e and it would be fine but he wrote a wall of text like that to say what already had been said Regarding 1, I still see it as a valid point. And what do you mean with "because to anyone outside you or thrawn or me it looks solid"? I don't get what you want so say with this. Regarding 2, you mean this post, right? I missed that, my fault.
Number 1 is because thrawn EXPLAINS why he thinks like that with a quote from titanic and obs qt posts from another game which to anyone that isn't rayn or thrawn or me (you don't know what happened or anything) looks like a legitimate thing to say and if you had read it you would be unassuming and accept that as the blind truth.
So why didn't you?
Number 2 is rayn talking about thrawn not asking questions about his town read which he stated numerous times but you made extremely lengthy
so in total your first reason for voting thrawn is something that shows that you have not read the game or your scum read and the second reason implies you are sheeping without reading the game or you are writing at length about points that were already said
which is quite scummy
|
Where did i create a trap?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 26 2014 14:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:This is a game of two truths and i lie. In this post there is going to be one lie. You need to guess where:1) I started using the smiley only lately, some moths or maybe half a year ago because i like how it looks. I don't remember who used it in mafia games (maybe it was marv?) but anyways someone did and i think the colored smiley it gives looks cute. Therefore i have almost abandoned every other smiley, while i normally prefer ^^ , ^_^ , or :D . I absolutely hate XD smiley because when i played brood war a lot in battle.net when someone used XD you could tell they were Spanish. I hated Spanish kids in brood war. They thought everyone can speak español and they ended every single thing they said with XD or XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXD. Only thing they could say in English was "ally end" when they were about lo lose and i was about to ruin their precious stats. I refused to understand English at that point and started talking in Finnish. Anyways that smiley makes me see red every time i see it, except for when gumshoe does it. Just because gumshoe is so adorable. 2) My "town wins this belt" post was indeed a town claim. I was happy rolling town and i don't give a fuck who else is town because i just find two mafia and then town wins the belt. I am also amused that Robik has called my alignment correctly out three times based on my usage / usagelessness. I don't know how he does it and i don't think it's alignment indicative but i am really interested in seeing is so some sort of psychic or what because i have a townread on him in this game. I don't believe Robik yet, i mean, i don't believe that's a reliable tell but we'll see about that when / if he does that a couple of times more and if he is right or wrong. 3) I think this is absolutely the worst post in thread: Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 13:22 Holyflare wrote:
So why do you not mention that rayn is super town based on x, y, z but instead mention that you read him as town from an alignment null post? Were you lying?
Point 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
