Doctor Who Mafia 2 - Page 4

On April 03 2014 06:30 Amiko wrote:
wait...

@kushm4sta:
I think you are cleared green, but I would like answers to the following if you are willing:
- You have a vote affecting power and a one-shot vig power?
- If you had one-shot vig power, did you consider shooting Alakaslam / someone else yesterday?

On April 03 2014 06:42 Hopeless1der wrote:

Ignore kush for the moment. Your thoughts on Toad?

On April 03 2014 05:37 Hopeless1der wrote:
**MOD RELATED DISCUSSION**
1) invoking foolishness I find completely unfair, especially as I am the target. This seems to be a huge factor in rayn not giving a shit and yet Toad is still alive and not doing that much. He also mentioned that he disagreed with foolish on how to read slam. It seems that Toad actually had a conversation with foolish about this game.
-----
Actual Scumhunty things:
2) In light of the above, Toad accuses rayn of "knowing he's town" (i.e. Toad is telling the truth therefore he must be town). He also notes that Kita is obv town at a time when it didnt seem like a very reliable read and that rayn was "to watch".

3) Completely hung up on Thrawn supposedly having a 100% townread on rayn. I dont think thrawn was that confident, nor is it thrawns responsibility to save rayn. Furthermore, any time anyone brings up ANYTHING else, Toad's default response is 'dunno, havent read that"

4) Who really thought Toad would have been a decent bluesnipe? I do not.
4a)Perhaps he was trying to cover for the fact that gumshoe hero-docced amiko? (Complete conjecture)

the part that you should not be talking about because it's nonsense unless you know peoples alignment and even given that you still end up with a kind of null on Kita, at the very least not a strong read, so it should be even less of a thing to be worth saying instead of talking about the important things like why rayn should not have been lynched. Kita wasn't about to be lynched, there's no need to "defend" him if you consider that a semi-town read.

On March 30 2014 15:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Because if you are telling the truth you have an opinion from someone who is not in the game and you even POINT IT OUT IN THREAD.

Hey, if you are telling the truth we know Foolishness has a scumread on Hopeless.
Fair play right?

On April 03 2014 08:08 Djodref wrote:


What about my arguments then ?
Hopeless has been Toad's scumread but...
Toad didn't push Hopeless lynch D1. Toad forgot about Hopeless since rayn's lynch. Toad is barely playing.

On April 01 2014 05:06 kitaman27 wrote:


Suppose slam is a survivor, has a role that we could force him to use in a pro-town or a role that can be confirmed, you don't care what he says?

We don't need to believe him. If he lies, then he lies. If he is truthful, then we get to pick how he uses his role in exchange for his survival, rather than having a neutral player choose to use their role to their personal benefit. In PTP, I was forced to roleclaim as survivor and town eventually lynched it for me because I was shooting townies left and right. Remember?

To be honest, I'd even be interested in hearing a fake claim to give us a better idea of potential roles in the setup.

On April 03 2014 00:58 Hopeless1der wrote:
i.e. no, claiming doesnt prove anything, everyone has fakeclaims, everyone is probably blue.

On April 03 2014 08:52 Hopeless1der wrote:
Why are you pissing about with setup speculation JJD? Do you have a point here? Am I scum because I obviously have a fakeclaim that I wont reveal and you dont therefore you must be town? Stop beating around the bush.

On March 09 2014 14:50 Crossfire99 wrote:
Claiming:
Claiming your role is allowed, but you cannot claim when you got your role pm, who sent it to you, etc. Fake roleclaims are provided before the game and on request to all players no matter your alignment.