|
On April 08 2014 00:44 Hopeless1der wrote: so we're cool here to chill until deadline right? #angrysquawk
A Bird God has squawked angrily at you. Do you:
(1) Squawk back at it, though you lack the organs necessary to produce a powerful and mighty squawk?
(2) Read some more of kush and thrawn and poofter and whatnot?
(3) Speculate in thread about how you, as a host, would balance a conversion ability, and how you think it MIGHT work.
(4) State in thread how conversion abilities work this game, while accidentally or purposefully revealing you are mafia
(5) Goad another player to do (4)
|
Ugh. Between Hopeless and Poofter, I'm way scummier on hopeless. I honestly do not believe Poofter fits the bill for mafia.
I dunno about you, but I can't be sure thrawn is town. I think kita's flip is somewhat telling there, but thrawn has been wonky on the issue of kita for a while, and the quick conclusion that kita was town after kush's flip is....unsettling at best. I don't come to that conclusion, it doesn't seem YOU came to that conclusion, and it's one reason I keep asking about stuff like how kush checks / doesn't check / lies / doesn't lie with the scumometer on kita, because I'm trying to see how thrawn connects or doesn't connect the two.
|
On April 08 2014 03:55 Vivax wrote: Do you think kita can roleblock me jailing hopeless if you roleblock kita? Alternatively we can both RB hope. I...don't fully trust that kita has a RB, or is being truthful about his role.
Given that we don't know exactly what mafia does, and we don't know what order roleblocks and things occur in, we're never going to be sure exactly what can and can't happen.
I think it comes down to either us both blocking the same target, us choosing independently in sekrit so as to keep scum from knowing what we're doing. If we're blocking different targets and that's in thread, scum can do the optimal thing for scum. So I think we either hide the info OR we publish it, but with the 2nd RB for backup.
|
Let's both RB hope. There's just less risk to it, we'll know that there's a RB, and we'll have info from kita's flip and knowing that hopeless didn't take an action?
|
Which is maybe true or maybe false. kush had a passive, an active, and redacted info that likely deals with conversions. We are NOT in a world where "I maybe do this thing, or maybe something that gives me similar info, or maybe something else, or maybe any combination of those things" holds water
|
Wrong phrasing on the holds water
|
#somewhatenthusiasticsquawk
|
But yeah, overthinking the roles makes me paranoid AND hurts my head.
We're fine though. I need to make up for last time I became impromptu town leader, lead a scum lynch, and then proceeded to LOLLYNCHTOWNIES for 3-4 cycles and not commit enough time to the game. I do NOT want that happening again, town's got this.
|
Oh. I blocked Hopeless. No mindgames.
|
Hope, let's hear it if you got something.
|
gg vivax, thanks for the protects gg kita too.
So kita town D1. Means someone else mafia D1.
|
On April 08 2014 06:27 Amiko wrote: (also that means rayn was wrong d1 :D go bug him in obs if you want ) On April 08 2014 06:27 Amiko wrote: (also that means rayn was wrong d1 :D go bug him in obs if you want ) On April 08 2014 06:27 Amiko wrote: (also that means rayn was wrong d1 :D go bug him in obs if you want ) On April 08 2014 06:27 Amiko wrote: (also that means rayn was wrong d1 :D go bug him in obs if you want ) On April 08 2014 06:27 Amiko wrote: (also that means rayn was wrong d1 :D go bug him in obs if you want ) On April 08 2014 06:27 Amiko wrote: (also that means rayn was wrong d1 :D go bug him in obs if you want ) <3 rayn
|
Sorry, trying to devote a little time to the other game. Thrawn i'm around tomorrow to talk, but I don't really see a world where Poofter is mafia and you are not mafia.
You're welcome to try and convince me, and I'll actually listen, but that Kita post looks quite odd. Kita being a conversion is a point in your favor though, up until that post about Kita looking town, you were a good conversion target but not a good initial option.
|
On April 08 2014 16:32 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2014 04:37 austinmcc wrote: We're fine though. I need to make up for last time I became impromptu town leader, lead a scum lynch, and then proceeded to LOLLYNCHTOWNIES for 3-4 cycles and not commit enough time to the game. I do NOT want that happening again, town's got this. sup austin? Morning.
Yes thrawn, I don't like you for original scum. I like poofter LESS though, so you still get to be scummier than him. Mainly though, what I see is:
amiko posting and trying to figure the game out
thrawn posting and trying to get a lynch off himself and figure the game out (posts about poofter that are suspicious, but also finding things that possibly clear poofter. Mafia needs a mislynch, they'd prefer not to clear ANYBODY)
hopeless doing NADA except maybe trying to implicate poofter and saying he had to look into it more
poofter also doing NADA......
Also that's a solid find on thrawn wondering why no kitanuke. Based on him being a probable N1 conversion, scum likely don't want to lynch their new toy, see KUSH BEING ALL WEIRD ON KITA.
|
On April 09 2014 01:12 thrawn2112 wrote: austin didn't you say that you didn't like tehpoofter's d1 and found his post d1 to be better, and the opposite about me?
so I don't unerstand your perspective there at all.
but idc much about that as long as you aren't wanting to lynch either of us, cause you should be lynchgn hopeless I didn't like poofter's D1, no. I liked your D1.
But poofter is not scum for me. Not D1, not N1, not D4000 (I guess barring a conversion). His posting during N1 and early D2 means that he just isn't scum. Of any kind at that point. He could have done something short of claiming scum N1, 18 times, and then made those posts, and I'd find him town. That "I was asking people about a case on me because I'm town and I think my accuser is town, and I think scum might take peculiar stances on town/town suspicions" line of thought just isn't something scum make up on the spot, 100%
You don't have anything that I feel equally strong about.
|
On April 09 2014 01:13 thrawn2112 wrote: austin wtf are these suspicious posts about ehpoofter i've made? Not the posts suspicious. When you're wanting to talk to me about his D1, it can be assumed that you find it scummy and maybe want to argue that he's scum.
|
Like not "suspicious posts" but "posts that are suspicious of poofter"
|
Btw, what WERE you specifically worried about? It's still worth going over.
|
Ah, okay. I'm a bit paranoid here.
|
I started to paint a picture of Amy Pond destroying a cyberman, then quit. Right now I'm firmly on hopeless for scum, but interested in the promised discussion.
Or if not the promised discussion, hopeless are you just...around?
|
|
|
|