EPT[M][T] Foundation Mafia - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
On March 05 2014 06:22 Grackaroni wrote: Oatsmaster: Oatsmaster offers opinions of other origins. Oatsmaster often opposite others. Once overly open - obvious Oatsmaster Least bad post you've made in this thread. GJ. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
Grackaroni has decided to be an asshole, but whatever, we can deal with that. He hasn't outed himself as scum. Good vigi shot if we have one though. His read on Oats is good. Oats is town MVP, is he's scum, I'm just going to actively try to lose the game for town. I have no idea why boone is so emotional. I don't like that she really focuses on those long summary posts and doesn't interact much with the thread, she hasn't really taken part in more than one "ongoing discussion" yet. austin is being wrong a lot and misrepresenting shit, not sure if it means his scum, but it very well could be. Robik's maybe town, based on what he said earlier. rayn idk, he looked okay-ish today, but I guess we'll see tomorrow when it's crunch time. VE is the same, he has done some things that make me think he could be town but he's also just chasing a lurker lynch for whatever reason. Not that I'd mind policy lynching GGtemplar and then yelling at him post-game if he flips town, but it's just so pointless this early in the day Dandel is meh. Slam looked good early and is now just not here. Both players should troll less tomorrow and help clear up the picture. All in all, I think the day was... okay-ish. Tomorrow we go after actual targets. if like 2-3 people stop trolling/lurking/saying bad thing then we should have a decent chance of hitting scum tomorrow. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
If nothing else, I clarified with thrawn that the wording on the OP is actually 100% correct. So amongst other reasons I want to policy lynch her for roleclaiming on day 1. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
##Vote Boonetown | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
Why do you not want to lynch boone rayn? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
On March 05 2014 17:46 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't see a reason why i should lynch her. Here's a few things. The most important one Kill roleclaimers And then there's the shit she posted. On March 04 2014 15:08 boonetown wrote: so, you're attempting to prove 2 things right now from what i can gather, 1) you have no idea what 'text book scum' means AND 2) you don't know how to read people that you've never played with. I was actually attempting to be funny with my first post while at the same time letting everyone know I wasn't down to just lynch someone based on RNG. I guess I'm not as funny as I thought, and having an opinion that differs from the rest, is seen as scummy here. FML, I should stick to video mafia. CAN'T YOU READ THE TONE OF MY VOICE!? She's completely misunderstanding the reason why people are suspicious, no one (I think) was calling her out on not wanting to RNG vote. The problem is that she doesn't explicitly state she's against it, even mentions she might be willing to join the bandwagon later. On March 05 2014 02:11 boonetown wrote: GGtemp - (I am directing this directly to Templar himself) I am having a hard time finding a world in which you are town here. Maybe it's because this is a different medium than we are used to playing mafia together on, but you seem very off, withdrawn, trolly and the way you are voting boggles my mind. I have a much easier time in games when I can read you town and trust you, because in late game you're awesome. The way you are throwing around reads with no explaination, and jumping on the boonetown bandwagon causes me to believe you are not town. You know better than to vote so fast on something so small. She reads so much from so little posting... She tried to push what is essentially a lurker lynch. At the time templar had posted nothing of value to the thread. A few people tried to push him around this time too (VE, killing). I explained why pushing lurkers was really pointless this early in the game. I'm not saying I'm opposed to killing templar, he's doing some really stupid shit, but that doesn't justify this read. On March 05 2014 05:32 boonetown wrote: I ask asked in the QT by Austin if it 'bothered' me that everyone was calling GGtemplar scum now. My answer was no, and I went on to say that I found it very contradicting that he would question how i felt on a templar BW, when more people were talking about me and my allignment and voting on me earlier, and he didn't once bring that up in the thread or QT. Unless I missed that, but I don't think I did. I sort of hate this game. I have no idea what she's even saying here. I think she's accusing austin of being scum based on him asking whether or not she felt the BW on templar was looking suspicious, while asking the same question about the bandwagon on her. And somehow this means austin is scum? I don't even know... but I see nothing wrong with people asking questions inconsistently and why it makes her retract the read so hard, whatever. And even much later in the day, here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=20916949 She is still focusing on Templar, who is still lurking and not doing anything. In fact, she admits the next post she writes this post unaware of the huge post Templar just wrote, so she's still chasing a lurker lynch. She hasn't really bothered to look at anyone else except for flip flopping on austin based on something in the QT. She's just doing the constant attacks on templar when he's not even in the thread to defend himself. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
On March 05 2014 17:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: I really don't like the bolded part because apparently there is also another mason group who also claimed and i don't know what are the "other reasons". As far as I understood, the other group is the "foundation group". There is only one of those, so your group is something else. I don't really care what it is, but it has to be a role of some sort, so I'm killing boone for roleclaiming. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
I clarified with thrawn that his wording is CORRECT. There should only be one foundation chat at time. So whatever it is that you/austin/her are in, is not the foundation chat. One of you has a role, or the host decided to add random hidden mechanics to the game for lulz. I'm inclined to think it's the former. So, I'm killing boonetown for roleclaiming. I thought I was gonna kill austin today for misrepresenting my position, but this kill is better. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
I still think we should lynch boone. The QT makes her look a tiny bit better, but tbh I also have this nagging feeling that she outed the QT as a desperation move. And then there's the point I made earlier on how much she's doing statements instead of conversations. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
But whatever, I think this is an okay lynch, then we shoot someone like killing or austin or something. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
On March 05 2014 22:33 justanothertownie wrote: Could you explain to me the scum motivation of outing the qt to the thread? In what way exactly would that be a desperation move? There is no reason to out the QT as either alignment because if all these people happen to be town, mafia knows where to shoot for a chance of a blue role. I refuse to believe there is a random mechanic in the game, so I'm pretty sure it has to be role related. She did it just to throw information out there. The only thing I take from it is that she wants to reveal she has additional information, but that might be a town thing to do as well. ie: she raised a new discussion point and her status in the thread. It's good for both alignments but a bad play in general. Why does boone perform a bad play for her own sake? It can be explained by her being both scum and town, which is why I said "I have this feeling". ie: I cannot prove it. | ||
| ||
