[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia - Page 5

On February 20 2014 23:22 Koshi wrote:

3 people find this a problem. hmm.

The first time I might have thought we all voted ourselves to show neutrality. But then he start talking about standard votes and I might have been confused for moment.

On February 20 2014 23:25 marvellosity wrote:
Ok. marv's proposal:

I don't think we're going to get any further with Toad on this. How about we leave him be and let him scumhunt and do his thing in peace for a while. I think that'll be more useful than keep going over the same things that aren't going to change no matter how much we talk about them.

On February 20 2014 23:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:

also read the last sentence in suki's post.

On February 20 2014 23:56 suki wrote:
From my previous experience with Koshi, these posts are more likely to come from scum Koshi than town Koshi.

This is just off the top of my head because I've gotta go in 10 mins. In Shadowed: The Reboot, Koshi was town and he was active from the start, putting down votes, pressuring, calling out contraditions. In the original Shadowed game, he just talked random shit and wasn't interested in making reads for at least the first part of Day 1.

Koshi's behaviour makes me feel like he's not interested in finding who is scum but is just happy to sheep. Regardless of my meta read on him, his contributions to this thread haven't been more than sheeping and weak accusations.

Also Koshi I have definitely done more than you this game. At the very least my reads have reasons.

I'll be back later.

On February 20 2014 23:57 marvellosity wrote:

Since when do mafia openly state they will sheep? Have you ever come across that?

Can you provide evidence of mafia-Koshi doing that like he has in this game?

On February 21 2014 00:38 Oatsmaster wrote:
yeah i really dont like the koshi case #bandwagon
##vote suki
marv, stop bitching about my absence, ill post when I want to.

On February 21 2014 01:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
also comment on the same stuff I asked marv to comment. please, thanks!

On February 21 2014 01:18 Oatsmaster wrote:

its not my fault you dont check meta >.>

On February 21 2014 01:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What's wrong in suki's case is that she says basically same stuff me, Palmar and prplhz talked about earlier. She is not interested in why we do not think that makes Koshi scummy, instead she makes a case where she already knows the stuff she is going to say is "right", it's a safe case because it's already agreed on before it's even posted. But in the end she expresses the thought "i know my case might not be good enough so i'll vote for Toad later on if you guys want to".

I don't see the "this is why Koshi is mafia" type of thing.
I see "here is a safe contribution".

That's my interpretation of that post.

On February 21 2014 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:



These 2.

On February 21 2014 01:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am kinda interested why you didn't want to be friends with me earlier Palmar.