|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:38 suki wrote: Great. You go ahead and sheep your way to victory. I should try that some time instead of wasting all this effort. Do you still think Palmar is suspicious?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
suki I don't mean to be calling you bad or ignoring you so if you feel that way please stop.
I already indicated in the thread earlier that I thought you were a competent player for both alignments.
Given you actually try you're ok in my book whether you're town or mafia, so let's just play le game.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Also if I think someone is scum I'll pressure them a fuckton to either try to confirm or deny my read somehow. So you'll just have to get used to that.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Isn't rayn's vote on me? Did I miss it going back to suki?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
rayn doesn't have much like with #s
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:48 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 23:43 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:On February 21 2014 23:38 Palmar wrote:On February 21 2014 23:31 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:On February 21 2014 20:40 marvellosity wrote: ok, just carrying on looking through Smurf's filter. The biggest problem I have at the end of it is that after all his catchup posts he actually has no conclusions about anything, at all.
I have no real idea what Smurf thinks about anything. That's because I didn't really have any scumreads at the end. Strongest suspicion was on Suki. Currently it's on Toad. Too many scummy things, something that happened in Shadow as well yet everyone decided to not lynch him for it. The contradiction and his focus on defending himself, calling you a liar but not scum, all counts in for it. ##Unvote ##Vote Toadesstern ![[image loading]](http://aznbadger.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/exploding-head.gif?w=406) I thought suki and Toad were suspicious, but I didn't have a strong inclination at the time which was why my vote was on myself. Is that so strange? can you believe this guy? yeah it's a bit dodge. oh well.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
what isn't? A massive catchup followed by no-one he wanted to vote for except he apparently did have suspicions.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I don't really care why you did the headexplode thing though
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 22 2014 00:03 Oatsmaster wrote: ##vote smurfdude I actually look better than I have in recent games so I have no idea why he thinks im worse. He clearly has played with me before and therefore is intentionally misrepresenting my play in order to twist it to call me scum Wasn't it you who told me you look better as mafia on day 1?
Woopsie!
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
yeah no-one likes Oats suki :d
might be nice if he explained that Palmar switcheroo though
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 22 2014 00:03 Oatsmaster wrote: ##vote smurfdude I actually look better than I have in recent games so I have no idea why he thinks im worse. He clearly has played with me before and therefore is intentionally misrepresenting my play in order to twist it to call me scum
On February 21 2014 01:20 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 01:19 Palmar wrote:On February 21 2014 01:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 21 2014 01:14 Palmar wrote: I don't like you.
I'm mad at you for last game cause you're lazy and boring. its not my fault you dont check meta >.> I shouldn't need to. People should play to win, not play to their shitty meta. no, you check the meta to see that I look like town early and look like scum late as scum but I look like scum all game as town. .. Uh oh...........
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Anyway, in short, Oats attacked Palmar earlier for not checking Oats' meta and seeing that Oats plays scummier as town
Now Oats says he looks better and so smurf is mafia for trying to lynch him, when surely if Oats looks better he's more likely to be mafia, according to his own self-description of meta
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 22 2014 00:12 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2014 00:09 marvellosity wrote: Anyway, in short, Oats attacked Palmar earlier for not checking Oats' meta and seeing that Oats plays scummier as town
Now Oats says he looks better and so smurf is mafia for trying to lynch him, when surely if Oats looks better he's more likely to be mafia, according to his own self-description of meta If Oats actually looks scummier as town then I'd find it more likely he's town here. However, the fact that he brought up this meta himself and then proceeds to call my read bad when he has said he's basically playing to his scum meta is pretty damning. I want him to come back and defend himself/shout at me. Will be v disappointed if that's his one post -> afk
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 22 2014 00:23 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2014 00:11 VIVAX420 wrote: I will quit mafia forever if toad is town I'm holding you to that. Now I want Toad to flip town
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
you're right, I don't. I want to believe that I could believe that though.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 22 2014 01:21 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont get really how me looking better than recent games = me looking town. what does better mean otherwise?
|
|
|
|