EPTOn February 12 2014 00:00 Aquanim wrote:+ Show Spoiler +
@Oats: AFAIK these are the points you've raised against Sidesprang, and I don't really like them much at all.
the things he pointed out in your filters were slightly suspicious, which was all he was saying at the time AFAIK
he isnt reading in depth at all to know that I think johnny is town
Did you think Johnny was town? news to me
and his townread on suki doesnt make sense either
meh... dunno that this is particularly scummy
bleh its hard to phrase but I dont get the feeling like he is questioning anything at all in this game.
that I'll have to think about
Sidesprang being scum for being unsure about his reads doesn't really convince me. Nor does him not talking about every facet of someone's filter.
idk exactly what he meant by this, but I strongly doubt it was a scumclaim.
sidesprang's vote on Johnny was in the middle of a list post where he said stuff about multiple people. I don't see how amplifing a vote with "stuff" is scummy.
Too many list posts with questions it doesnt seem like he cares about the answers at all.
He has two list posts, both made pretty soon after he returned to the thread from a long absense - updating the thread on your current reads makes some sense in that instance. Of those two list posts, only one of them has questions.
So what? I've seen scum make good points about other people. I again don't see what your problem is here.
I can quite easily imagine a townie just wanting Coag gone regardless of his alignment - that's not too far away from my own position.
Look, Oats, if I'm wrong here about Sidesprang I'd prefer you to convince me than not - but your cases haven't done it yet.
@Oats: AFAIK these are the points you've raised against Sidesprang, and I don't really like them much at all.
On February 07 2014 19:17 Oatsmaster wrote:
...
##unvote
##vote Sidesprang
Firstly his scumreads dont make sense. He summarizes all our filters and doesnt say anything about how it makes us scum,
...
##unvote
##vote Sidesprang
Firstly his scumreads dont make sense. He summarizes all our filters and doesnt say anything about how it makes us scum,
the things he pointed out in your filters were slightly suspicious, which was all he was saying at the time AFAIK
he isnt reading in depth at all to know that I think johnny is town
Did you think Johnny was town? news to me
and his townread on suki doesnt make sense either
meh... dunno that this is particularly scummy
bleh its hard to phrase but I dont get the feeling like he is questioning anything at all in this game.
that I'll have to think about
On February 10 2014 00:04 Oatsmaster wrote:
Sidesprang totally scummy for waffling on his read on me and hopeless and he doesnt even say what he thinks about our votes and stuff leading up to it. did you forget sidesprang?
Sidesprang totally scummy for waffling on his read on me and hopeless and he doesnt even say what he thinks about our votes and stuff leading up to it. did you forget sidesprang?
Sidesprang being scum for being unsure about his reads doesn't really convince me. Nor does him not talking about every facet of someone's filter.
idk exactly what he meant by this, but I strongly doubt it was a scumclaim.
On February 10 2014 11:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
sidesprang's vote on Johnny came late and felt like he unnecessarily added stuff in order to not be 'sheeping'.
sidesprang's vote on Johnny came late and felt like he unnecessarily added stuff in order to not be 'sheeping'.
sidesprang's vote on Johnny was in the middle of a list post where he said stuff about multiple people. I don't see how amplifing a vote with "stuff" is scummy.
Too many list posts with questions it doesnt seem like he cares about the answers at all.
He has two list posts, both made pretty soon after he returned to the thread from a long absense - updating the thread on your current reads makes some sense in that instance. Of those two list posts, only one of them has questions.
So what? I've seen scum make good points about other people. I again don't see what your problem is here.
On February 11 2014 16:30 Oatsmaster wrote:
Lol coag is totally an angry lynch. Dont waste today lynching town guys. As scum coag just wouldve given up and not be angry. Sidesprang is todays lynch for bandwagonning onto coag without reasons on why coag is scum
Lol coag is totally an angry lynch. Dont waste today lynching town guys. As scum coag just wouldve given up and not be angry. Sidesprang is todays lynch for bandwagonning onto coag without reasons on why coag is scum
I can quite easily imagine a townie just wanting Coag gone regardless of his alignment - that's not too far away from my own position.
Look, Oats, if I'm wrong here about Sidesprang I'd prefer you to convince me than not - but your cases haven't done it yet.
to this post.
On February 12 2014 06:45 Aquanim wrote:
Ha! Do your worst Coag.
Reading his filter again, it's still marginal but I think there was a significant amount more thought going into his posts in the newbie, rather than just summarising the thread (which more accurately describes here).
Can't say I'm hugely confident in this one but
##Unvote
##Vote: Sidesprang
Ha! Do your worst Coag.
Reading his filter again, it's still marginal but I think there was a significant amount more thought going into his posts in the newbie, rather than just summarising the thread (which more accurately describes here).
Can't say I'm hugely confident in this one but
##Unvote
##Vote: Sidesprang
