EPTDoes VCA lead you to believe one must be scum?
GSL Open Mini Mafia IV - Page 70
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
Does VCA lead you to believe one must be scum? | ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
VOTE COUNT: Mattchew (3): gumshoe (1): bumatlarge(1): Mordanis sidesprang(1): JarJarDrinks JarJarDrinks(0): With 10 players alive it takes 6 votes to lynch. Only votes in the Voting Thread will be counted! | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
| ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
bumatlarge is the first to vote and he's the first to admittedly say On February 16 2014 09:21 bumatlarge wrote: I'm cautious about how many people are jumping on Shiao. Even if I think he's the scummiest I've come across in the thread, the reasons aren't all that strong. Sure he has little content and doesn't seem to be improving them, but day 1 townies do this. Mattchew, I think this is what you usually do, but can you give a little more detail to who you are accusing? I wouldn't insult the game of mafia by calling them reads. You seem "ok with lynching X" about all of the time. The only thing I've liked about what you said so far is about sidespring. Do you have more on every other player in the game you've mentioned? HUGE HUGE HUGE townread on bumatlarge for this. Then vivax, mattchew, roundabound and sidesprang jumped on. thrawn voted then unvoted. then roundabound claimed mafia and there was a huge push against roundabound. After it was clear that he was kidding, there was a push back onto shiaopi. vivax vote didn't change off of shiao. mattchew and bumatlarge voted for shiao. then thrawn. Sidesprang was the 6th vote and then roundabound cappedi t. I really really don't like sidesprang. I will reread his filter...but he seems the scummiest based off of vote placement. Mattchew also doesn't look too good for it. I think those two could be scum and then the 3rd scum didn't vote -- which would be grack/jjd/gumshoe/mordanis. That's where I'm at right now. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
| ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
hes not here. he will either come back or ge tmodkilled. why not wait until then? its not that nothing is happening in the meantime. i am doing work. i am reading filters. i am trying to figure out who the scum is. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
| ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
also i dont think bum should be given a hard townread for questioning a mislynch. I think you are just as likely to find scum off the mislynch wagon as on it. | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
Rayn, why specifically matt over sidesprang whom you have been pushing since D1? ~V | ||
|
roundabound
Niue881 Posts
On February 20 2014 01:48 VIVAX420 wrote: @ Raynsta Rayn, why specifically matt over sidesprang whom you have been pushing since D1? ~V Because we are scum and both are mislynches. What don't you get about neither of us playing anymore. BH rules are we are entitled to lurk; so thats it for us. Carry on, but don't bother us cos we aint responding. ~moc | ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 19 2014 06:23 Grackaroni wrote: OK, aside from that statement being totally disingenuous, I find it strange that Grack was so easily willing to switch his vote to me considering how "strong" gumshoes case was. Especially considering his reasoning was based on the first 3 posts in my my filter.No that's not true. He had two quotes - one where his opinion was being attacked and he passively backed off of it rather than defending his opinion, and another where you personally attacked him and his reply was extremely passive and appears disingenuous. And I am starting to agree with Kushm4sta on you right now. Gumshoe's case was one of the strongest cases I've seen in the last few games I've played, and all you've done since reading it is attempt to discredit him for a fake scum slip, discredit myself for following his case now and not your case earlier, and refuse to comment on the case until Mattchew responds. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
On February 20 2014 01:59 JarJarDrinks wrote: OK, aside from that statement being totally disingenuous, I find it strange that Grack was so easily willing to switch his vote to me considering how "strong" gumshoes case was. Especially considering his reasoning was based on the first 3 posts in my my filter. I've always been good with the Mattchew lynch. Sometimes I switch things up just to see what will happen. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
Rather than, "this is kinda strange. He thinks Gumshoe's case was strong and still voted me. Also like his case was based off the first 3 posts in my filter where I was suspicious of the 2 most active people in the thread" | ||
| ||
