|
On February 14 2014 13:11 VIVAX420 wrote:
nah its because in the beginning he was super active and now he is more absent. the read was 100% based on activity soo yeah.
i decided to stop reading him a while back so i have no idea what his content is like.
Lololol
This is all kush right?
Only vivax signs, yeah?
~moc
|
On February 14 2014 13:15 VIVAX420 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2014 11:32 roundabound wrote:On February 13 2014 08:30 DoNotPanic! wrote:
Why are you attacking the try-hardest person in the thread Rayn? This is the worst post in the game thus far. Facts (A) DNP considers IAR "try-hard" (B) DNP chooses to query Rayn about attacking DNP Issues (1) What is DNP read of IAR? <- try-hard is not indicative of any alignment (2) The question itself is so vague/open/non-specific that it goes no-where <- a feigned contribution (3) Where is the follow-up? If Rayn is considered a town read, why ask this useless question If Rayn is considered a scum read, why not pursue this further. <- again, feigned contribution In short, I can not comprehend the intent of this post. I can not comprehend how this post helps in any way, shape or form to ascertain the alignment of rayn and, I can not comprehend why even a bad townie would choose to interject at this point in the discussion with something so useless. Scum right here. ~moc Unfortunately, my connection theory has been already proven wrong.. sigh ##Vote: DNP Show nested quote +I can not comprehend why even a bad townie would choose to interject at this point in the discussion with something so useless.
this post is full of shit actually. I know this because i was thinking the same thing that DNP said, and I wanted to say it. And i am townie.
It doesn't matter what you thought
You didn't think enough to make a post on it.
Further your opinion is explicit. Rob was town. That piece is missing from dnp.
U r filling in gaps.....~moc
|
On February 14 2014 14:14 VIVAX420 wrote:
3. Activity: There are no hard activity requirements for this game. If I feel like you are being inactive, I will privately warn you. If this does not improve the situation, I'll use my personal judgement.
seems like bh is gonna warn him then modkill him
Man.. I hate this situation.
Usually results in scum walking away based on predicting host decision to then Lynch town.
I haven't seen the replacement thread light up so doubt anything has been said as of yet.
~moc
|
So what.. We wait 3 weeks to Lynch someone because all the prime targets are doing nothing?
~moc
|
... I've got nothing to ask
I think time would be best spent producing reads pretty departure
~moc
|
I think me and rayn are about to butt heads.
There is a stark quality difference between DNP and mordanis
Sigh... I am eagerly awaiting the next contribution mord
Matthew. If u sheep dnp bar kid, does that mean u want to Lynch shiaopi?
|
|
|
On February 14 2014 15:39 DoNotPanic! wrote:
No other questions? A player who hasn't posted for 24 hours has came into the thread.
4 people have posted, and not one person has asked me anything of relevance.
With shiaopi u concentrated on one post
Based on your jjd position, I imagine shiaopi is your recommended lynch wagon.
What is your interpretation on the rest of his filter.
~moc
|
I guess I was asking what was your take on his consistent early aggression.
But u have lumped that as useless.
Noted
Does Mattchew sheep delurk affect your null read?
~moc
|
OK
Hi storrzerg
Anything to make of QP only making 1 reply on reentry?
~moc
|
I figured if u knew mattchew intimately u might be a video mafia guy.either way u bought your replacement a cycle.
I have no want to lynch u. Very reasonable approach I think especially compared to others.
##unvote
~moc
|
On February 14 2014 16:54 Mordanis wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2014 13:34 VIVAX420 wrote:
thrawn timeline:
lurk scumstyle
start tryharding because vivax caught him
continue to lurk when the pressure goes down As per my last post, could someone who knows thrawn let me know if this isa reasonable case or not?
Reasonable observation: tick
Reasonable to raise: tick
Reasonable case: duh duhhhhh
~moc
|
Grack who's your preferred lynch atm and why?
~rayn
|
On February 13 2014 22:39 sidesprang wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2014 22:26 VIVAX420 wrote:
i thought more about mattchew's comment on sidespring.
the post itself wasn't nervous, but I think it might show nervousness that he chose to talk about setup over everything else. wtf...
This is a really bad answer to the suspicions raised on sidesprang earlier on. I didn't find the post about setup scummy but this answer to the case on him is really underwhelming.
On February 14 2014 02:12 sidesprang wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2014 01:57 Grackaroni wrote:
Sheepin' it up.
##Vote: Sidesprang You know there is a seperate voting thread ? @JJD, you were pretty much on me whole last game aswell. Was town there, think you should adjust the way you are reading me.
Also this rings alarm bells. JJD read sidesprang wrong in the last game, now he is not supposed to think he is mafia, only for that reason? Really bad..
I also have no idea who this guy thinks is mafia. Read his filter. Can someone tell who sidesprang thinks is scum? Pretty much all of his posts are weak defenses that are not really even defenses or questions that are not followed up in any way.
##Vote: sidesprang
I've no idea where Mocsta stands and i need to talk to him about DNP and Mordanis, but i do not wanna lynch JJD. He looks like he is at least trying to play and he'll give away his alignment later on. But sidesprang is the most suspicious person in thread for me atm.
~rayn
|
On February 15 2014 01:50 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2014 01:47 roundabound wrote:
Grack who's your preferred lynch atm and why?
~rayn I'm still ok with lynching Kushm4sta. He looks off and I don't know what the fuck Vivax is doing.
Cna you build up an actual case? kushamsta says stuff that is dumb all the time. I don't think they are near top suspicious people. While the motivation behind some of their posts is really hard to understand it's normal at least for kush lol.
~rayn
|
On February 15 2014 02:01 IAmRobik wrote:Rayn, Based off of the quoted interaction and what I remember from JJD/Sidesprang, I believe there is a non-0 chance that they are mafia together. This is really easy to say to a mafia partner in thread: Show nested quote +@JJD, you were pretty much on me whole last game aswell. Was town there, think you should adjust the way you are reading me. It's not angry or anything. It's just blah. I'm town. When you were calling me scum earlier, I was genuinely upset. I was getting irate, and I believe that translated into my posts. Sidesprang is not showing that sort of emotion. I'm not saying that every player has to get angry or show emotion when playing, but I think it's only natural that the tone of your post would reflect your emotional state.
I don't really get what you are rtying to say here? Could you clarify?
~rayn
|
On February 15 2014 02:07 IAmRobik wrote:
I am saying that I'm not sold that the interaction between sidespring and JJD can't be M/M.
I'm also saying that an individuals tone changes when they are town and they are called mafia. I'm not saying this ALWAYS happens, but from personal experience, I think that sidesprang's post would show a little more attitude and fervor if he was town and defending himself against someone calling him mafia for what he thinks is a shitty reason.
I don't look at connections between players before we have a flipped mafia because as town you can't base someone's alignment based on "scum/scum interactions" if you don't know the other player's alignment. Yes, they could both be mafia, but sidesprang's defense is really bad regardless of JJD's alignment because it does not address the suspicion it self, it's basically appealing to something irrelevant as it basically says "you read me wrong last game therefore you should not trust on your read in this game". That's horrible.
If sidesprang flips mafia then we look into other people's interactions with him and go from there. That's how i see it. I've seen many times people do these connection cases that are terrible, like in one of the last games there was a dude who was obviously mafia and people did not lynch him before LYLO because some other mafia dude "cleared him as town". Good or even decent scumplayers know how to play with people's minds like that and in general those kinda assumptions are not good.
~rayn
|
If there is something scummy in this interaction between sidesprang and JJD based on sidesprang's post that he was called out for from JJD's side, it's the fact that he does not call this bullshit defense out and goes after Grack.
Generally JJD has, as Mocsta pointed out already, just +1'd other people's thoughts and gone after multiple people based on what other guys have said despite not bringing those things up before himself.
~rayn
|
So Grack, about that case?
~rayn
|
On February 15 2014 02:38 Grackaroni wrote:Oh I'm not writing any specific case. That's just my general feeling.
Okay then i doubt you can get him lynched today. Do you think he is a realistic lynch candidate without a case? Who's your pick for second scum?
~rayn
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
