|
On February 15 2014 02:24 roundabound wrote:
If there is something scummy in this interaction between sidesprang and JJD based on sidesprang's post that he was called out for from JJD's side, it's the fact that he does not call this bullshit defense out and goes after Grack. I guess. I mean yeah, it is shitty reasoning, but it is true so I thought that maybe he's right and I should back off for the time being. Especially since he was blue I believe. I'm gonna reread him in that game and see what exactly I thought was scummy.
|
On February 15 2014 02:48 roundabound wrote:
Okay that post is really terrible JJD. Why the fuck would you read THAT game? What does it have to do with the game we are playing here?
~rayn
because I obviously thought he looked scummy for a reason in that game. If the reasons are the same then there's a chance I'm wrong here too.
If you're asking me what I think of him this game w/o taking the other game into account then I'd say that I think he's scummy. But I think it'd be dumb to not take the other game into account.
|
On February 15 2014 02:57 IAmRobik wrote:
So just to make sure I got this right, you're going to go read the previous game where you thought he was scummy, but he was in fact town to see if:
1) he talked about game setup in that game
2) if he lurked Ur being obtuse. I want to see if he avoided talking about people and giving reads by talking about 'safe' stuff. Not if he specifically talked about setup.
and from what I'm seeing from an reading so far is that I thought he was scummy early on for a similiar reason. He talked about stuff like how people shouldn't lurk and spam the thread. And I called him out for it being a 'safe' post, just like I did here.
|
On February 15 2014 03:18 IAmRobik wrote:
That's all you garnered from his posts that game? That was his first post in that game. After that, he went on to provide (what I believe to be) a lot of substance. He gave reads, he responded to votes on him, he did something. This game, his participation is lacking. His posts are 1-2 liners as opposed to paragraphs of analysis reasoning that went into his posts in that game. The sample size for me is very small as I'm only comparing this game to that game, but to not see a stark contrast.....?
I was just saying that I read him scum early on in that game for reasons similiar to how I read him early this game. I am in no way saying that I think he's playing exactly like he played that game. All I said was I wanted to back off him a bit and give him a chance before jumping on him.
|
I think I explained my reasoning about rayn pretty well and it was one read out of many. DNP just took a shot and left which is what I think was scummy.
|
On February 15 2014 00:27 JarJarDrinks wrote:
@DNP. I wasn't criticizing roundabouts case on you. I was saying that a scummy action doesnt mean that a person was 100% scum. He was on me about my case against sidespring and I used his case against you as an example.
|
vivax, U selectively quoting that w/o also quoting what I was responding to is shifty as fuck.
Here's the full quote for anyone that caresOn February 14 2014 01:03 JarJarDrinks wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2014 00:28 roundabound wrote:
I have seen plenty of town only discuss setup early game; you have failed to elucidate me towards why this tell is only indicative of a mafia mindset. scummy <> only indicative of a mafia mindset. You read DNP as scum because he made 1 shitty post and then peaced. I have seen plenty of town make 1 shitty post and go awol for a while. Can you tell me why this tell is only indicative of a mafia mindset?
|
On February 15 2014 03:57 thrawn2112 wrote:
I understand that JJD only made the latter post to make a point in a conversation with roundabound, but the fact that he wrote those words means that he knows from past experience that town can "make 1 shitty post and go awol for a while." If this is his mindset about reading DP's single post, why is he so eager to commit to lynching DP for that one post? On February 14 2014 10:37 JarJarDrinks wrote:
I think we should vote off the scummiest looking lurker.
|
Vivax, it really seems like you're trying to get me to move my vote off of Grack and onto Shiao. All I said about Shiao was I'd be fine lynching a lurker.
What do you think of grack?
|
Sorry people, been crazy busy but caught up now.
Glad to see votes move off ShiaoPi since he doesn't really seem scummy to me. Not crazy about the votes now on Mordanis since I feel the same about him.
Can people tell me what they have against lynching Grack? Half his posts are trolling and the few reads he has seem pretty superficial. Right now he's voting for sidespring and here's basically all the reason he's given:On February 14 2014 01:57 Grackaroni wrote:
Sheepin' it up.
##Vote: Sidesprang
And he's left his vote there conveniently despite the fact that the people he was supposedly 'sheeping' have since changed. He hasn't really given an opinion on anyone this game.
|
QP is a better lynch than mord for sure
|
Also FWIW, I thought gumshoes post read very townie to me.
|
##unvote
##vote: sidesprang
This was kinda discussed but sidespringe retracting his vote for roundabout makes no sense:
Here he explains how it's a policy vote:On February 16 2014 17:26 sidesprang wrote:
Why would we not vote him? On February 16 2014 17:26 VIVAX420 wrote:
it feels like he's fake claiming scum. On February 16 2014 17:27 sidesprang wrote:
Then he deserves to get policy lynched, and hopefully a ban aswell. So he's saying that even if he's town, he deserves to be lynched for fake claiming scum.
So why in the world would he unvote him after round said he was lying?
Here's his explaination:On February 17 2014 00:59 roundabound wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2014 00:54 sidesprang wrote:
And its not a read, its him scumclaiming and voting himself. So why are you not voting for us now? Why did the policy disappear? ~rayn On February 17 2014 01:01 sidesprang wrote:
Cause he took the claim away? but that makes no sense. He just told us that he deserves to be policy lynched. So the fact that he took the claim away shouldn't have much to do w/ the reason he's voting for him. Especially since:On February 15 2014 05:08 sidesprang wrote:
No I have no scumreads that I feel strongly enough to lynch. You'd think that he'd leave his vote on his policy lynch then. It's not like he has some other great read that he really needs to not waste his vote.
|
So are those real claims? If so, can you guys explain why u claimed?
|
|
|
On February 19 2014 02:2 VIVAX420 wrote:
jar why are you bluefishing? People are making claims. I'm asking if they're legit. That's not bluefishing.
|
On February 19 2014 02:38 IAmRobik wrote:
People openly role hunting ITT.
wtf? was the NesTea pic not an Fn cop claim? Why did you post it?
|
On February 19 2014 02:39 IAmRobik wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2014 23:10 VIVAX420 wrote:
Oh s hit I think ran moc might be scum. Thrawn looks bad also. HOLY SHIT. I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU POSTED THIS AND THEY STILL KILLED THRAWN. I WAS CERTAIN WE WERE GOING TO LYNCH HIM TODAY! OK this might be the scummiest post I've seen from Irob this game.
"Lemme just point out how this is totally not the NK I would have chosen if I was scum"
|
didn't mattchew promise that he would eventually explain why he had a townread on me?
|
On February 19 2014 03:29 gumshoe wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2014 02:55 JarJarDrinks wrote:On February 19 2014 02:38 IAmRobik wrote:
People openly role hunting ITT. wtf? was the NesTea pic not an Fn cop claim? Why did you post it? This will be the last thing said about blue roles today, there is only a parity cop or a doctor. There was no shot block and it's not day 2 yet. Aside from stupidity there is almost no reason to claim a role today (minus a fake boxer one in hopes of avoiding a lynch) and absolutely none for you to be asking about it. Sidespring claimed Cop. Grack claimed Doctor. It would be stupid to not discuss these things.
I guess Irob posted his nestea pic for some other reason but it looked like we were gonna have dueling cop claims.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
