So is kush's plan dumb? Or do you think it could help us in the future and there's a reason that's pretty potent? Or are you just indifferent to the whole matter?

Show nested quote +

Inconsistent views on kush's plan (he think's it's dumb / sees arguments for it / is mostly indifferent). Wishy-washy.

And I just hate the bolded red line in general.

##unvote
##vote VisceraEyes

The scum hunt is strong with this one. I'd like VE to explain his thought process on the first part, he seems to be changing his mind mid post, then it would make more sense as town.

bumatlarge

United States4567 Posts

January 20 2014 09:33 GMT

#184

On January 20 2014 17:48 Wile E. Coyote wrote:

Show nested quote +

This is a logical reaction.

I disagree, the only reason you think it's reasonable is because he is holding back because he probably wrong about you. I'm just working out what I can remember from VE if he posts like this as town.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

January 20 2014 10:12 GMT

#185

Vote Count!

Kushm4sta (0) - ~~Suki~~, ~~Thrawn~~

Suki (1) - Kushm4sta

Thrawn (0) - ~~Rayn~~

VisceraEyes (First to 2) - JonnyLaw, Suki

Wile E. Coyote (2) - Rayn, VisceraEyes

Currently VisceraEyes is set to be lynched. The deadline is Tuesday, Jan 21 11:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) there are remaining in day one.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43266 Posts

January 20 2014 11:26 GMT

#186

Is anyone here?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43266 Posts

January 20 2014 11:45 GMT

#187

suki's case is really bad and bumatlarge has zero posts that make any sense.

##unvote

zarepath

United States1626 Posts

January 20 2014 12:44 GMT

#188

I thought VE was talking about the two different plans, kush's "don't lynch anyone who claims blue" plan and the Boxer claim plan. I don't know what he was talking about with the "2 is pretty potent" quote, I have no idea what he's saying. But I didn't think he was inconsistent while reading him because he had two different opinions on two different plans.

zarepath

United States1626 Posts

January 20 2014 12:48 GMT

#189

@Thrawn, VE's vote seemed premature to me because I didn't really see a super early blue claim as scummy, but not wholly unreasonable considering Wile WAS directly contradicting everything he had said earlier.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43266 Posts

January 20 2014 12:50 GMT

#190

What do you think of bumatlarge's posts?

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

January 20 2014 13:23 GMT

#191

Feels
thrawn's town.
wiley is town
i think rayn is town
i think VE is town
balla is scummy for being a scumhunter extraordinaire yet doing nothing

VisceraEyes

United States21170 Posts

January 20 2014 13:28 GMT

#192

Yes I have been referring to two plans since the game has started. A really bad Kush plan trying to make blue claims unlynchable, and the proposed plan for Named VTs to claim.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43266 Posts

January 20 2014 13:31 GMT

#193

kush why do you think thrawn is town?
VE opinions on bumatlarge's posts?

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

January 20 2014 13:32 GMT

#194

I'm pretty sure I can tone read thrawn. more inquisitive, less formal as town

suki

Canada1159 Posts

January 20 2014 13:33 GMT

#195

On January 20 2014 21:44 zarepath wrote:
I thought VE was talking about the two different plans, kush's "don't lynch anyone who claims blue" plan and the Boxer claim plan.

Hm.. You're right. I got confused between the two different plans.

I still don't like his 'want other opinions' comment. When Wile/slam claimed I made a mental note to see who would jump on him because it would be an easy scum bandwagon to try to push. VE insta-voted him.

My vote is staying on VE.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43266 Posts

January 20 2014 13:35 GMT

#196

On January 20 2014 22:32 kushm4sta wrote:
I'm pretty sure I can tone read thrawn. more inquisitive, less formal as town

But you just called him scum because he is wrong on you?

VisceraEyes

United States21170 Posts

January 20 2014 13:36 GMT

#197

There isn't much to them. After reading through I can at least say that he weakly agrees that I look bad (though I don't know why) and he believes the boxer claim and he thinks other boxers should not claim.

I wouldn't mind some elaboration on his issue with me.

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

January 20 2014 13:36 GMT

#198

On January 20 2014 22:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Show nested quote +

But you just called him scum because he is wrong on you?

that was then this is now

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

January 20 2014 13:37 GMT

#199

i wanna know why you voted for the boxer ve... the purpose of the boxer is that someone can claim it and be confirmed town.
that was just so dumb I thought.

VisceraEyes

United States21170 Posts

January 20 2014 13:39 GMT

#200

I don't believe the claim. He said he doesn't think boxers should claim and immediately claims? He was either lying then or he is lying now... his play makes more sense if he is scum.