|
On January 21 2014 01:24 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2014 01:17 Oatsmaster wrote:
sn0man, where did your skan and oats read come from, you seemed to want to lynch Toad and hopeless day 1. You guys have both spend the entire game posting 1-line snipes that are pretty much dedicated to starting flame-wars and self-defense. Zero scumhunting. There's nothing to quote from your filters because there's nothing in them. Skanjab's day 1 case is the only thing worth mentioning and it's ridiculous garbage built on nothing day 1. Doesn't count as scumhunting, does count as trying to look good. You in particular oats, your main contributions were "huge flame war with thrawn" -> lurk "huge flame war with rayn". I fail to see how town!Oats does that exclusively instead of actually scumhunting. Your "lynch rayn" case boiled down to "he thinks i'm scum lol" no other reasons. Plus you dropped it in seconds as soon as I showed up. Toad I still don't get but I don't want to lynch uncountered cop claim see above. Hopeless does have a vet claim and his posts struck me as better going through the thread. If there's a serious push to lynch him as I mentioned I can go back and re-read his filter specifically. However, I don't feel the need to do that when you two are so clearly scum.
Well your first point is a complete lie, so thats dandy.
|
|
|
On January 21 2014 01:24 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2014 01:17 Oatsmaster wrote:
sn0man, where did your skan and oats read come from, you seemed to want to lynch Toad and hopeless day 1. You guys have both spend the entire game posting 1-line snipes that are pretty much dedicated to starting flame-wars and self-defense. Zero scumhunting. There's nothing to quote from your filters because there's nothing in them. Skanjab's day 1 case is the only thing worth mentioning and it's ridiculous garbage built on nothing day 1. Doesn't count as scumhunting, does count as trying to look good. You in particular oats, your main contributions were "huge flame war with thrawn" -> lurk "huge flame war with rayn". I fail to see how town!Oats does that exclusively instead of actually scumhunting. Your "lynch rayn" case boiled down to "he thinks i'm scum lol" no other reasons. Plus you dropped it in seconds as soon as I showed up. Toad I still don't get but I don't want to lynch uncountered cop claim see above. Hopeless does have a vet claim and his posts struck me as better going through the thread. If there's a serious push to lynch him as I mentioned I can go back and re-read his filter specifically. However, I don't feel the need to do that when you two are so clearly scum.
No, my lynch rayn case was, "too aggressive and too much bullshit".
Like all this is just me being angry and shit, it doesnt show shit about me being scum. My 'huge flame war' was scumhunting, I pointed out some shit about you sn0 which you failed to address.
|
On January 21 2014 01:32 Skanjab1s wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2014 01:24 Sn0_Man wrote:On January 21 2014 01:17 Oatsmaster wrote:
sn0man, where did your skan and oats read come from, you seemed to want to lynch Toad and hopeless day 1. You guys have both spend the entire game posting 1-line snipes that are pretty much dedicated to starting flame-wars and self-defense. Zero scumhunting. There's nothing to quote from your filters because there's nothing in them. Skanjab's day 1 case is the only thing worth mentioning and it's ridiculous garbage built on nothing day 1. Doesn't count as scumhunting, does count as trying to look good. You in particular oats, your main contributions were "huge flame war with thrawn" -> lurk "huge flame war with rayn". I fail to see how town!Oats does that exclusively instead of actually scumhunting. Your "lynch rayn" case boiled down to "he thinks i'm scum lol" no other reasons. Plus you dropped it in seconds as soon as I showed up. Toad I still don't get but I don't want to lynch uncountered cop claim see above. Hopeless does have a vet claim and his posts struck me as better going through the thread. If there's a serious push to lynch him as I mentioned I can go back and re-read his filter specifically. However, I don't feel the need to do that when you two are so clearly scum. Well your first point is a complete lie, so thats dandy.
Do you wish to point out some fine examples of your or oats's scumhunting? I couldn't find them in your filters so I'm curious as to where you think I should look.
|
On January 21 2014 01:32 Sn0_Man wrote:
##Vote: Oatsmaster
why did you vote so late?
|
On January 21 2014 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote: My 'huge flame war' was scumhunting, I pointed out some shit about you sn0 which you failed to address.
I'm not at all certain what you are referring to, but if its the "I'm a sheep" bit then thats pretty sad.
I voted grack. I was convinced he was the best lynch for a loooong time. Then, after a LOT of badgering from others, some of whom I trusted as town, opted to vote hopeless who at the time was still clearly one of my scumreads. When the hopeless lynch all of a sudden dissipated for reasons that I'm still not quite sure about (actually, I should go re-read that), I reverted to my original preferred lynch candidate (grack). Simple.
|
On January 21 2014 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:why did you vote so late?
Couldn't decide who I thought was a better lynch, you or skanjab.
|
##vote: Toadesstern
I still had to vote again.
|
On January 21 2014 01:38 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2014 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote: My 'huge flame war' was scumhunting, I pointed out some shit about you sn0 which you failed to address. I'm not at all certain what you are referring to, but if its the "I'm a sheep" bit then thats pretty sad. I voted grack. I was convinced he was the best lynch for a loooong time. Then, after a LOT of badgering from others, some of whom I trusted as town, opted to vote hopeless who at the time was still clearly one of my scumreads. When the hopeless lynch all of a sudden dissipated for reasons that I'm still not quite sure about (actually, I should go re-read that), I reverted to my original preferred lynch candidate (grack). Simple.
bullshit.
On January 18 2014 06:11 Sn0_Man wrote:
What the fuck ever.
You guys wanna lynch hopeless? Fine. Lynch hopeless.
##Unvote
##Vote: Hopeless1der
Its really not that I don't think he's scum, but we are gonna have these bullshit coinflip lynches later when grack and ceph and co continue to do fucknothign and those lynches are gonna be lylo or mylo or w/e and that shit sucks.
[/QUOTE]
On January 18 2014 07:03 Sn0_Man wrote:
What happened to everybody being so certain Hopeless is scum?
I move my vote off of some incredibly useless player who has solid odds of flipping scum (especially if he slipped as toad seems to think) to Hopeless specifically because you guys are so fucking certain that he's scum, and as soon as I do everybody is like "abandon ship lets lynch some random person who we haven't even discussed at all in thread". For crying out loud at least give me a case to work with.
Otherwise I'm going to go right back to lynching Grack.
|
Why isnt anyone else seeing this SUPER SHEEPING that is happening in these 2 quotes? Is sn0 not sheeping?
|
I move my vote off of some incredibly useless player who has solid odds of flipping scum (especially if he slipped as toad seems to think)
This. This is a scumslip. So much scumslips.
|
Thats exactly what I said.
I got badgered into voteing hopeless then everybody was like "lulz jk" and unvoted hopeless. I asked for some sort of justification for it, specifically why other people are specifically scummy, and got nothing. So I went right back to grack my original vote.
|
why even vote hopeless????? ITS PURALITY.
|
Its like you arent convincing people to vote for Grack, to get off hopeless onto grack, to do ANYTHING at all. Just reacting to the thread, not creating content and pushing people.
|
On January 21 2014 02:20 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +I move my vote off of some incredibly useless player who has solid odds of flipping scum (especially if he slipped as toad seems to think) This. This is a scumslip. So much scumslips.
See here you are back to your 1-liner snipes with no explanation because you know there isn't any.
On January 21 2014 02:20 Oatsmaster wrote:
Why isnt anyone else seeing this SUPER SHEEPING that is happening in these 2 quotes? Is sn0 not sheeping?
Working with a townread is sheeping? I was willing to go with what thrawn and kush were saying because they were making the most sense at that time. I'd been fairly suspicious of hopeless all game. However, I wasn't gonna leave my vote on hopeless for no reason once it became clear he wasn't getting lynched so I moved back to my other preferred lynch. This all makes sense from a town perspective. The one that you obviously don't share.
|
On January 21 2014 02:33 Oatsmaster wrote:
why even vote hopeless????? ITS PURALITY.
Thanks for bringing this up when sn0 was concerned about where his vote was going or how people might just strike off and vote their "top scum read" with no regard for attaining a town-wide consensus on who should be lynched. You're soo good oats.
|
On January 21 2014 02:39 Sn0_Man wrote:
I was willing to go with what thrawn and kush were saying because they were making the most sense at that time.
On D1:
On January 18 2014 07:36 Sn0_Man wrote:
Kush do you see what you are doing to this lynch?
I have no idea why everybody is so convinced you are town.
##unvote:
##Vote: Sn0_Man
There is absolutely no way you thought kush was making sense on D1 as you kinda called him mafia at the end of D1.
|
Talking about when they got me to swap to hopeless dumbass.
Kush shortly thereafter went apeshit but for a while he made sense. So I voted hopeless.
|
This is timed after my grack vote but before my hopeless vote:
On January 18 2014 04:06 Sn0_Man wrote:
Okay, but the whole thread is scummy how do i choose?
Toad is full of shit and being dumb
Grack outright refuses to do anything that might indicate towniness
Hopeless wont stop sniping from the sidelines and making accusations without substantiating cases or contributing
Vaynes all mysterious and awful
Mig still won't do anything other than call me scum
Koshis all Koshi
And thats without cephiro the utterly afk.
How do I choose who to lynch? I choose whoever I think isn't gonna become more readable and lynch the crap outta them. Today its grack.
No kush on my scum list there DESPITE MY PREVIOUS VOTE ON HIM because he was making sense and thrawn was backing him.
Then he started changing votes everywhere and I got really confused with what he was doing. I felt like the lynch was gonna end up with some last minute shenanigans which basically always favour scum so I got mad at him and flamed him. Didn't call him scum though.
|
On January 21 2014 02:48 Sn0_Man wrote:
Talking about when they got me to swap to hopeless dumbass.
Kush shortly thereafter went apeshit but for a while he made sense. So I voted hopeless.
Your responses to kush don't seem like you thought he was making sense, and had good thoughts, stuff like this:
On January 18 2014 01:56 Sn0_Man wrote:
Kush have you read me at all this game?
On January 18 2014 05:42 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2014 05:40 kushm4sta wrote:
You are really going to lynch him for being honest about himself? Scum also do this but so do town so it's null. Uh, the only thing that could possibly defend him is that point, which you just listed as "null". Beyond that its all scum.
On January 18 2014 06:03 Sn0_Man wrote:
No he still isn't doing shit he's just pretending that he has an excuse for not doing shit cuz kush gave him one.
Kinda make it seem like you think he is full of shit, or silly. I don't think you'd react to him like that if you thought he was a positive, sense-making town presence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
