|
On May 24 2014 05:28 Blazinghand wrote:
Don't worry guys, I won't reveal my role unless it's necessary to save my life. My role is such that I can't reveal it without making it substantially less useful going forward, assuming scum has certain roles/powers.
Exactly. I second this and this just confirms BH all the more, I am really surprised BH wasn't shot
|
On May 24 2014 05:26 Steveling wrote:
BlazingHand the only way I'll take you seriously and anyone else for that matter, is if you reveal your role.
Its high time I think by now.
Same goes for slam.
Noooo...
Actually, ##Vote: Steveling
|
On May 24 2014 05:33 Steveling wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2014 05:32 Alakaslam wrote:On May 24 2014 05:26 Steveling wrote:
BlazingHand the only way I'll take you seriously and anyone else for that matter, is if you reveal your role.
Its high time I think by now.
Same goes for slam. Noooo... Actually, ##Vote: Steveling Slam+BH 3rd party confirmed. Ironically enough considering BH's name they are the fire djinnies. ##bote: Blazinghand
You know, in foundation mafia, MULE had a role that could write messages to town with day/night posts
This looks awfully convenient for that same type of scenario, and explains why M_Z of all folks dies.
|
Actually that is right I forgot Steve made that claim
So unvote
|
On May 24 2014 05:39 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2014 05:33 Steveling wrote:On May 24 2014 05:32 Alakaslam wrote:On May 24 2014 05:26 Steveling wrote:
BlazingHand the only way I'll take you seriously and anyone else for that matter, is if you reveal your role.
Its high time I think by now.
Same goes for slam. Noooo... Actually, ##Vote: Steveling Slam+BH 3rd party confirmed. Ironically enough considering BH's name they are the fire djinnies. ##bote: Blazinghand wouldn't this actually be "fitting" rather than "ironic"? It would be ironic if my name was like, frostinghand. but instead it's literally the opposite of that.
Irony is not necessarily opposite but yeah I believe that is true
|
On May 24 2014 05:45 layabout wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2014 05:24 geript wrote:On May 24 2014 05:23 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Geript, who did you shoot, if any? Nobody, I just don't trust my reads right now and have been on a really fucked up sleep schedule and haven't made time to filter dive heavily. "Yo guys i claimed vig day 1 i had time to make a 12 page filter but i didn't have time to find a lurker, a spammer, read posts about who to vig shot or have a single scum read. I tunneled steveling to the point of spamming the thread accusing him of being scum but i didn't shoot him either. Furthermore i didn't use my bullet since I didn't expect to be roleblocked or shot by mafia"
Layabout is town.
This is quite a case and worded so concisely!
|
On May 24 2014 05:51 Steveling wrote:
I don't like how BH was the first to clearly speak about the setting after all these kills happened.
Seems like he's one of them djinnis.
But then why did he claimed isaac?
But then why is scummy slam sheeping him?
It all rests in the isaac role and I'm willing to take the risk of unveiling a good town role too early than him being scum surviving until late game abusing his semi-claim.
This is news, how am I scummy? I thought I was unreadable and fried minds & stuff
|
Napa you aren't addressing Austin's best point
You go from valenius strong scum to "almost haven't even thought of valenius" in a way that suggests you know he is town and forgot you had an opportunity to mislynch him/didn't need to put in the work anymore.
|
On May 24 2014 06:16 mtamburini wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2014 06:09 Blazinghand wrote:
Man I already voted tambo, analyzed kill flavor (but actually correctly) and proved you wrong, all in like an hour! I'm a productivity tornado I dont get it do you think Im scummy for that or towny?
What you quoted is wholly unrelated to you dude, except that he mentions voting you
|
On May 24 2014 06:35 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2014 06:33 thrawn2112 wrote:
lets lynch BH for obviously getting recruited N1 assuming recruiting is in fact what being controlled by a djinn means, the amount of stupid I would have to be to even hint that such a thing was possible right after being recruited is astronomical. Surely you can't be serious.
Ditto, I am Garrett.
|
On May 24 2014 06:33 thrawn2112 wrote:
lets lynch BH for obviously getting recruited N1
Are you serious
People how can you not see to lynch Thrawn? Likely Kush as well
|
On May 24 2014 06:49 Steveling wrote:
BH, calm and serene. Pls.
Can you answer why you revealed your role d1 if you knew beforehand that your role can be recruited?
Do you think we can trust you now?
CANNOT YOU FOOL
|
HIJOLE I apologize I keep forgetting Greece has another language
Genuine apology I am sorry steve
|
On May 24 2014 07:12 BlueyD wrote:
Hey Slam, what do you think about BH's claim?
---
Also Hapa I like your cases much more than austin's case on you. Agree with lynching burini or yellow.
What do you think of cav?
Ashamed of myself I didn't catch the fact that yellow had scumreads and wasn't voting for them, blegh. Though you don't seem to have caught that until way after he made that post with reads in it, like you still had your vote on Val for a while after that. Any explanation on that delay?
I literally know it to be true now, I am Garrett.
|
On May 24 2014 07:11 Xatalos wrote:
Not if the Isaac-controller-thing-player is lynched?
EVERYONE STOP BEING FOOLS AND READ. WE ARE IMMUNE, NOT CONTROLLED
YOU ARE CONTROLLABLE
WE ARE IMMUNE
THAT IS A POWER, WHAT BLUE ROLE HAS A WEAKNESS?
|
On May 24 2014 07:21 Steveling wrote:
Which present us with a dilemma.
We know BH is Isaac, we know he can be controlled.
Do we lynch him before they use his power?
MY GOD
WE ARE FOOLS BUT AMN
|
On May 24 2014 07:20 BlueyD wrote:
Mostly Slam
For posterity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
