EPT
Golden Sun: The Lost Age Mafia Djinn Edition - Page 88
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
On May 22 2014 08:57 Holyflare wrote: the only reason i wouldn't lynch you was because rayn claimed scum, no offence Yes, you were the only person who thought what gumshoe did was fine. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
| ||
|
Cavalinho
United States946 Posts
But whatever, my words didn't really hold the same kind of weight as anyone else's. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On May 22 2014 08:40 Holyflare wrote: why the fuck are you angry and especially at marv? marvs read is sheeped from me and koshi I have limited access i was around at the start when most of the thread was shit. I tried to respond to the relevant bits but i was not reading the thread particularly closely because there isn't much of value around. I get back and a bullshit wagon that only started because i wasn't around when the thread started to get better and because entering a thread that is stacked against you is not all that fun because no one listens to you and very few people will look at what you say the way they should once they start to think you are scummy even if their suspicious were originally quite shaky. marv is right in that i was avoiding taking a stance but that was mostly because i try to be careful at the super early stages and don't like taking stances when i haven't made my mind up, which if you have been reading (unlikely i know) is actually really ironic. cephiros case was the only thing in the thread that i thought was important he asked for opinions and i offered one. But because i didn't end with i" think ninja bunny is ___ so we should(n't) lynch her" i get this. | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
On May 22 2014 09:01 geript wrote: Oh right. Scumeling only got angry and rumbled with both Rayn and Gum. Wasn't a shitfights that he retracted himself from at all. Don't know if english is your mother language but could you phrase this again? | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
Y u do dis? I was having fun. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On May 22 2014 09:05 Steveling wrote: Also fu guys, now I'm in srs mode. Y u do dis? I was having fun. I bore of flame baiting scum. Can we lynch it already? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
##Foolishness Read: WaveofShadow | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On May 22 2014 09:02 layabout wrote: I have limited access i was around at the start when most of the thread was shit. I tried to respond to the relevant bits but i was not reading the thread particularly closely because there isn't much of value around. I get back and a bullshit wagon that only started because i wasn't around when the thread started to get better and because entering a thread that is stacked against you is not all that fun because no one listens to you and very few people will look at what you say the way they should once they start to think you are scummy even if their suspicious were originally quite shaky. marv is right in that i was avoiding taking a stance but that was mostly because i try to be careful at the super early stages and don't like taking stances when i haven't made my mind up, which if you have been reading (unlikely i know) is actually really ironic. cephiros case was the only thing in the thread that i thought was important he asked for opinions and i offered one. But because i didn't end with i" think ninja bunny is ___ so we should(n't) lynch her" i get this. that's not the reason at all it's not because you haven't taken a stance it's because you start the first part of your post saying that everything bunnies did is logical and towny and then contradict that in the second paragraph saying it's significantly scummy? Those two things do not equate at all and the only reason people are on you is because of that and your lack of involvement with the rest of the game. I don't like your insults of reading the thread "unlikely i know" when I'm the one who has done the most shit in this game while you sit back and complain how you're getting lynched when you know full well your activity and content is poop why do you feel the need to be careful at the start of the game instead of just saying what you think? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
27ninjabunnies
United States2486 Posts
On May 22 2014 09:05 Steveling wrote: Also fu guys, now I'm in srs mode. Y u do dis? I was having fun. You can still have fun!!!! | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
On May 22 2014 09:07 geript wrote: I bore of flame baiting scum. Can we lynch it already? Why? I have already proven you a liar. If you have anything else that "OMG HES SO SPAMMY AND GORGEOUS AND I CANT STAND IT", bring it to the table. | ||
|
mattisfoolish
United States76 Posts
geript, not sure what you saw about sqrt that set off the alarm bells but I didn't see anything. Also what are the arguments against jampidampi? I don't see anything noteworthy there either. Just a town guy doing his town thing. Austin, I'm not sure what your purpose was in asking me that question. Are you looking for proof that I am who I say I am? It's in the hydra name and signature. I don't think there's a specific rule about lying about this sort of thing but I feel it would be in bad taste to do so. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
mattisfoolish
United States76 Posts
On May 22 2014 09:07 layabout wrote: WoS what happened to you? You used to believe in playing properly and got frustrated at people dicking around. What have you become?You seem quite eager to talk about things which aren't the game ##Foolishness Read: WaveofShadow On May 21 2014 12:32 mattisfoolish wrote: 1) If you are a reputable townie* and are getting a bad feeling about another player X** type in the thread: ##Foolishness Read: Person X Notes: **If Person X's name equals marvellosity, HolyFlare or WaveOfShadow your request will be ignored. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6789 Posts
@Kita, all sqrt had done was make lame setup comments and made one nonsensical vote. In my mind at that stage in the game that's a lot better reasoning to vote someone than some of the other reasons for voting people had provided. I had been hoping you'd come out and stand by your reasoning at the time but instead what happened was you tried to minimize it which just felt really off to me. It's less about your reasoning for voting and more about the way you defended the vote. Like if you were that meh about it why make it in the first place. | ||
|
mattisfoolish
United States76 Posts
| ||
| ||
