Golden Sun: The Lost Age Mafia Djinn Edition - Page 6

On May 22 2014 04:04 sqrtofneg1 wrote:

Geript said that people like me who give those kinds of townreads are usually mafia.
That's what I contradicted.

On May 22 2014 04:09 sqrtofneg1 wrote:

Correction:
First I said: Everyone who said this is town (referring to hapa)
Geript replies: No, usually people who say that everyone who said this is town are scum. (referring to me, aka I'm scum)
Then I reply: Yes, usually but not this time. (aka I'm not scum)

On May 22 2014 04:12 Holyflare wrote:
why is that? for having basic reading comprehension? :o

On May 22 2014 04:41 sqrtofneg1 wrote:

Personally I don't think so.
Last game I played, Eden focused on finding serial killer rather than mafia.
Turned out to be mafia.
Smurfs are part of the game, but right now, as a town, you would be more focused on finding scum.

On May 22 2014 04:47 sqrtofneg1 wrote:

Why layabout? Explain plz.

On May 22 2014 05:49 bkqyrldp wrote:


I like this post. I'd like to hear more from laya.

On May 22 2014 07:03 Hapahauli wrote:


I'll get to layabout in a bit, but I'm curious what you think of Koshi?

On May 22 2014 07:00 austinmcc wrote:
Layabout's threadcop posts read slightly townie to me, like he was threadcopping not just to do it, not for cred, but because he actually didn't want to read steveling's posts or look at hula hoop pictures.

On May 22 2014 07:15 austinmcc wrote:
having played with a lot of fire/deadly sun rays in my life...i don't melt.

On May 22 2014 07:17 Alakaslam wrote:

Hmm? What I do

On May 22 2014 07:17 austinmcc wrote:
Also I don't want sheep yet.

Does willingness to sheep indicate you AGREE? Regardless of the answer there, whatchoo feel about wishy washiness and small --> large games.

1) 27ninjabunnies talks a whole lot about herself. I am kinda gonna sheep tamburini's reads on bunnies. I read a post and I am neutral, then I read the next one and I find it defensive and with 1 million I's in it, which puts me off. Then I read the next one and I am back to neutral. Idk, it just leaves me a bit skeptical because last game I played with her she was oozing town out of her pores it was so obvious, and the fact that I don't have that feeling right now gives me pause and concern. That said, she is contributing and typing seriously which is significantly more than most people (including myself) have done thus far.

2) I find the people who were highly opposed to the RNG lynch on day 1 questionable. Especially those who said things along the lines of "I think I am better than RNG". I think if you say that on day 2 you can sell me quite a bit on it, as I would not be in favor of an RNG lynch on any day after day 1. Usually there is enough information to make singinifcantly informed guesses by that point in the game. But when you say something along the lines of being "better than RNG" on day 1, it makes me think that you have more information than I do. Which very likely means that you are scum.

I have to do a couple things unexpectedly now and should be back in an hour or so to contribute more, but for now my I will at least leave my top town and scum read.

Top town: Meapak
Top scum: waveofshadow

On May 21 2014 15:15 ritoky wrote:


This wasn't directed at me, but I just got back and noticed a decent segue for me to give input on this as well.

re Yell0w: To me, his play is very much similar to the last game he played. He bumbles and fumbles with the details sometimes but overall I read his intentions are fairly pure for now. I don't necessarily think that because he contradicted himself that makes him mafia, it could just be bad VT play or forgetting what he said. He even admitted he contradicted himself, which is uncharacteristic of scum imo. Usually scum would be more concerned with keeping their story straight and their ducks in a row so early on.

re HF/Steve: I think a lot of that is predicated on reads from previous game experience with eachother, which I don't have with them so I can't say.

re Austin: null

re Ceph on bunnies: I think it is the most substantive accusation out there right now; that said I don't like all of the substance. I think bunnies has a ton of redeeming qualities and has done quite a bit to drive conversation so far, however as I said previously and as Ceph pointed out she seems very defensive in some posts and concerned with self image which is offputting for me. So for now I have her in a neutral area.

re Bunnies on thrawn: I think she is trying to shove a square peg in a circular hole. I think she is pushing a stubborn and conservative player who doesn't like making accusations until there is enough substance to make them into making an accusation before he is comfortable. As of now I like thrawn more than bunnies because he chose deliberately to not force out a read or flimsy accusation and stuck to his guns. However, that comes with an asterisk; that asterisk being that when he does talk, if it comes off as sheepish, parroting, or flimsy; then he is probably scum trying to blend in with the current of votes.

And just because someone (can't remember) seemed to think my read on waveofshadow was odd. I would say to you: read his filter. I find that he seems to be asking for a lot of information without giving anything back and either ignoring productive talking or actively avoiding it in a lot of cases. Much of what he says is jokes and non-committal responses. He could just be playing trolly VT during day 1, but I read it as more scummy.