On May 21 2014 10:22 27ninjabunnies wrote: Hi there. I may have an army of ninja bunnies at my disposal, but I assure you they are protecting town, not trying to kill them.
So, why are you reading me mafia?
This is your first post, and you vote on me. What are your reasons?
Confirming one thing, are you asking for my reasons as for:
1) Why I'm reading you as mafia? 2) Why I'm voting on you?
On May 21 2014 10:04 geript wrote: Like WTF people? We have guaranteed scum in Slam. It's a 100% read and I've never read him wrong. Hell last game he was under fire I flipped my read on him because of how well I understand his play despite Rayn being 100% against me. Like wtf. Just lynch Slam already.
Shoot him if you are 100% and lynch someone that gives us more info. Like if you're wrong on slam and he flips town we know 1) geript was wrong on slam or you were right on slam. If we lynch him then even if you're right mafia can play it off like "i didn't trust geripts read on slam" or pull out any of the number of weird things slam will post between now and EoD and mark it as a "town tell" they had wrong on him. So getting slam lynched I don't feel will garner us information.
Who else is scum besides Slam? Do you think marv is scum for real or you just shooting him cause he disagrees with you?
On May 21 2014 10:22 27ninjabunnies wrote: Hi there. I may have an army of ninja bunnies at my disposal, but I assure you they are protecting town, not trying to kill them.
So, why are you reading me mafia?
This is your first post, and you vote on me. What are your reasons?
Confirming one thing, are you asking for my reasons as for:
1) Why I'm reading you as mafia? 2) Why I'm voting on you?
Well I assume you are voting me because you are reading me as mafia.
On May 21 2014 06:30 Blazinghand wrote: 21385105 mod 32 is 17
##vote OdinofPergo
Ok
##Vote: OdinofPergo
Also. Slam worships the ground BH walks on. In what world could he ever as town make this post. There's no video. There's no "you have my axe". There is nothing here. Like Slam would never make a post like this as town.
On May 21 2014 10:26 geript wrote: Also for the record, Slam is the fox. Bye bye Marv.
lulz So much posturing in these games. I hereby taunt you for all to see, stating that there is no way you're shooting marv just for shits N1 (or D1?). a) Because you're better than that b) Because you do not have the, um, how you say, cojones
This is only true to an extent, scum still act differently due to the asymmetrical nature of information in the game and as is especially pertinent in the case of sk;s and other 1 player factions having differing win-cons.
1 player factions....?
serial killer, survivor, arsonist, cult master type shit or flavourlicious roles like batman.
there is probably 1 because 4 anti-town factions with multiple people each sounds mad
On May 21 2014 09:21 layabout wrote: There better be a load of smurfs cus i only know half of these names, if you dont know me please don't be a bitch about post count i am called layabout for a reason
#vote blazinghand on second thought i better read the thread first
Excuses about post count before anyone says anything about him, and a crossed vote on blazinghand (probably the most visible player so far) while pretending he hadn't read the thread.
So how did you pick Blazing there if you hadn't read the thread, layabout? RNG just falling on the most visible guy?
---
And his most recent post just now has some contradictory ideas about RNG. Open to it in theory, but then lists stuff he hates about it. Mehhh.
The thing is, geript, that even if you are in fact right and Slam is mafia, you go about the read in such an enormously prickish way that people just want to disagree with you because you're so prickish about it.
On May 21 2014 10:22 27ninjabunnies wrote: Hi there. I may have an army of ninja bunnies at my disposal, but I assure you they are protecting town, not trying to kill them.
So, why are you reading me mafia?
This is your first post, and you vote on me. What are your reasons?
Confirming one thing, are you asking for my reasons as for:
1) Why I'm reading you as mafia? 2) Why I'm voting on you?
Well I assume you are voting me because you are reading me as mafia.
So, why are you reading me as mafia?
I will have to respond to your question with another to stay true to my motives.
If I didn't consider you as mafia, why would I be voting for you?
Even if my replies seem very off to you, please do respond. You're under evaluation.
Praise be unto ABBA for a new and glorious game. I'm all ready to play Personal Vendetta Mafia, where everyone picks a partner and snipes back and forth and doesn't drop it.
BH, on an actual serious note, if you will, what do you believe is the value of an RNG vote in GENERAL? Purely to have an x% chance of hitting mafia?
On May 21 2014 09:21 layabout wrote: There better be a load of smurfs cus i only know half of these names, if you dont know me please don't be a bitch about post count i am called layabout for a reason
#vote blazinghand on second thought i better read the thread first
Excuses about post count before anyone says anything about him, and a crossed vote on blazinghand (probably the most visible player so far) while pretending he hadn't read the thread.
So how did you pick Blazing there if you hadn't read the thread, layabout? RNG just falling on the most visible guy?
---
And his most recent post just now has some contradictory ideas about RNG. Open to it in theory, but then lists stuff he hates about it. Mehhh.
I always pick blazinghand. I am pretty sure i have picked blazinghand in games he wasn't in. Still reading.
It's important to warn people that haven't seen you in games when you generally fall into the "small number of posts even when spending far too much time on the thread than is good for you" group as i tend to. When you don't GoT mafia happens, now you made me think about that game ima go find a nice corner, shudder and cry.
austin, it's pretty weird that you're trying to encourage more useless RNG discussion when the answer you're going to get is guaranteed to be useless. That earns you an askew glance.
On May 21 2014 09:21 layabout wrote: There better be a load of smurfs cus i only know half of these names, if you dont know me please don't be a bitch about post count i am called layabout for a reason
#vote blazinghand on second thought i better read the thread first
Excuses about post count before anyone says anything about him, and a crossed vote on blazinghand (probably the most visible player so far) while pretending he hadn't read the thread.
So how did you pick Blazing there if you hadn't read the thread, layabout? RNG just falling on the most visible guy?
---
And his most recent post just now has some contradictory ideas about RNG. Open to it in theory, but then lists stuff he hates about it. Mehhh.
I like you. I agree on your read on BKQ and this is a good point on layabout. Did you see Hapa's info on Valenius? + Show Spoiler +
On May 21 2014 07:54 Hapahauli wrote: Two things:
@ Holyflare
Why are you playing as if you have a stick up your butt?
On May 21 2014 06:22 Valenius wrote: 9 player day 1's normally confuse me. gg.
Sheep me sheeping marv. ezgame ezlife.
i thought you were hosting. wtf.
##vote: Koshi
Even though I am a divine being in this game. I ascended and joined the plebs. I don't have anything against plebs though, they are simple but amusing beings. I allow the smartest of them to call me Koshi. You can call me Master.
I might have meant descended. It is just hard for me to grasp going downwards.
It was such a nice post, I wasn't going to correct it for you.
On May 21 2014 06:49 Yell0w wrote: So about this whole RNG thing, aren't scum players more likely to vote for OdinofPergo if he isn't in their faction since they don't even need a reason to vote him? They can just claim they're doing it for RNG and get a lynch on someone who isn't aligned with them?
Wouldn't a better way be to each claim we are RNG voting, then use the RNG on the post in which we claimed it and then vote for whomever our own post said? So that there is no way to know if you're going to lynch someone of your own faction or not so it's riskier for scum to go by RNG? Maybe I'm completely wrong here.
I like that, I haven't thought it through - But I like it.
RNG V2
On May 21 2014 06:52 Valenius wrote: Actually, won't it cause the same theoretical situation, just with votes more spread?
On May 21 2014 07:33 Xatalos wrote: Why this change of heart?
Chalis (ハート Heart) is an antagonist in Golden Sun: Dark Dawn. Together with Blados, she is one of the commanders of a secretive military nation named Tuaparang.
All three are bad guys taunting us in the thread. I rest my case.
On May 21 2014 07:36 marvellosity wrote: Xatalos, I really have no idea, nor do I care, because I don't particularly strive to be consistent from game to game. Honestly the fact that you're beating away at this makes you look kinda better though, so maybe I'll unvote you if I'm feeling nice
On May 21 2014 07:32 Holyflare wrote: yes please do
##unvote ##vote steveling
You do realise, though, that Steve's semi-ridiculous behaviour makes it less likely he's mafia though, yes? (or traditional mafia. I'm just gonna say town for town and mafia for all the other factions until something tells me otherwise)
On May 21 2014 07:20 Holyflare wrote: if you're gonna play like last game i will actually policy lynch you and i honestly don't care
despite me being scum in the game he was talking about we literally only won because he was doing what he was doing as town and was an easy mislynch so i'm just going to get rid of him until he learns
Yes you literally only won because of my bad play as town right? Not because NO ONE, LITERALLY NO ONE VOTED FOR A SCUM IN ALL 3 DAYS.
Oh wait, except me.
^^^ case in point
anyway bh if you take out newbie games towns recently have a 40%+ chance of finding mafia day 1 by lynching and so it's obv far better not to rng
If you add in newbie games, we just lynch town/any claimed power roles. ezpz
6 posts, all of them a mixture of "+1'ing" other people and irrelevant comments. His filter reads a lot like someone who's artificially trying to insert himself in discussion.
##Vote: Valenius
I think the same thing on Vale and his posts seem fluffy. What do you think of them?
On May 21 2014 10:42 marvellosity wrote: austin, it's pretty weird that you're trying to encourage more useless RNG discussion when the answer you're going to get is guaranteed to be useless. That earns you an askew glance.
There's a string I see and want to tug at, even if the person holding the string likely just has a handful of spaghetti and nothing will happen.
On May 21 2014 10:39 austinmcc wrote: Praise be unto ABBA for a new and glorious game. I'm all ready to play Personal Vendetta Mafia, where everyone picks a partner and snipes back and forth and doesn't drop it.
BH, on an actual serious note, if you will, what do you believe is the value of an RNG vote in GENERAL? Purely to have an x% chance of hitting mafia?
On May 21 2014 10:22 27ninjabunnies wrote: Hi there. I may have an army of ninja bunnies at my disposal, but I assure you they are protecting town, not trying to kill them.
So, why are you reading me mafia?
This is your first post, and you vote on me. What are your reasons?
Confirming one thing, are you asking for my reasons as for:
1) Why I'm reading you as mafia? 2) Why I'm voting on you?
Well I assume you are voting me because you are reading me as mafia.
So, why are you reading me as mafia?
I will have to respond to your question with another to stay true to my motives.
If I didn't consider you as mafia, why would I be voting for you?
Even if my replies seem very off to you, please do respond. You're under evaluation.
If you don't consider me as mafia, you shouldn't be voting me.
The only reason outside of you considering me as mafia for why you would vote for me is this: you want to get a read on me via my reactions to your voting on me to see if I react poorly or more town favored. This is only used if you don't have a read on me from what I've previously posted.
This can also lead to reads from other people if they begin questioning you or agreeing with you.
On May 21 2014 10:42 marvellosity wrote: austin, it's pretty weird that you're trying to encourage more useless RNG discussion when the answer you're going to get is guaranteed to be useless. That earns you an askew glance.
There's a string I see and want to tug at, even if the person holding the string likely just has a handful of spaghetti and nothing will happen.
yes, and the fact you have chosen to tug at that string is pretty dodgy, actually.
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/WNDbTXd.png)
![[image loading]](http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view4/1422211/lazy-town-bing-bang-bitch-o.gif)
![[image loading]](http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120309173425/goldensun/images/thumb/b/ba/GSHeart.jpg/240px-GSHeart.jpg)
