On May 21 2014 14:40 Alakaslam wrote: I am sort of but not long. Just finished making the newbie sorry kita
IS geript right? Why is he wrong?
Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn?
He isn't because I am town and sometimes I feel like reading the game to further enhance my trolling/joking around and because I do actually enjoy thinking about whether or not something is alignment indicative.
KK can you answer the other stuff if you're reading
What other stuff?
On May 21 2014 14:43 Tehpoofter wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:40 Alakaslam wrote: I am sort of but not long. Just finished making the newbie sorry kita
IS geript right? Why is he wrong?
Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn?
Haven't even seen yellow, HF null, Steve town, Austin town, you see me talking about CEPHIRO I am trying to find out, haven't even seen anything NJB said except in CEPHIRO quote
Slam's got some seriously weak ass shit going on right now, I think people should really reread his filter and not dismiss him as easily.
To anyone in the thread, is this usual for slam? Because his whole filter feels like contrived crazy trying to get people to ignore him or dismiss him as too dumb for scum.
On May 22 2014 07:32 WaveofShadow wrote: This would be such an amazing game to be scum. Somebody besides Austin give me something to do mebbe? I dunno I feel like a dumb American watching a game of cricket right now.
Hey Wave I have something for you, pick up your game You've made me so sad so far
@BH: it's only supposed to be for D1, the point is since you're such a mafia god it shouldn't be too hard to get your primary only scum read lynched, especially now that you've claimed and are clearly, totally innocent.
On May 22 2014 07:32 WaveofShadow wrote: This would be such an amazing game to be scum. Somebody besides Austin give me something to do mebbe? I dunno I feel like a dumb American watching a game of cricket right now.
Hey Wave I have something for you, pick up your game You've made me so sad so far
Yay I was mentioned in a 5k post!
I dunno I'm legit having a shit time right now. What have you got besides memorializing me forever in your milestone post?
Who are the serious candidates right now that I should look into? I feel like layabout is one of them but to me that essentially amounts to lurker lynch I thinks. Who else?
People I think could definitely be red: Layabout Val
People I don't have good feelings about: Slam Bunnies
One of these three is probably red but I don't feel like figuring it out atm: Steve HF Hapa
Look at these people wave, that should give you something at least.
fuck I forgot BH, he's done nothing this game except say we should lynch odin because the magic 8 ball said so and talk about how he's never gonna get lynched because he's a turbo vet.
tbh I'm almost ready for steve to die so that I don't have to see him post anymore
@Kita, all sqrt had done was make lame setup comments and made one nonsensical vote. In my mind at that stage in the game that's a lot better reasoning to vote someone than some of the other reasons for voting people had provided. I had been hoping you'd come out and stand by your reasoning at the time but instead what happened was you tried to minimize it which just felt really off to me.
It's less about your reasoning for voting and more about the way you defended the vote. Like if you were that meh about it why make it in the first place.
On May 22 2014 07:48 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: @BH: it's only supposed to be for D1, the point is since you're such a mafia god it shouldn't be too hard to get your primary only scum read lynched, especially now that you've claimed and are clearly, totally innocent.
On May 22 2014 07:37 WaveofShadow wrote:
On May 22 2014 07:34 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
On May 22 2014 07:32 WaveofShadow wrote: This would be such an amazing game to be scum. Somebody besides Austin give me something to do mebbe? I dunno I feel like a dumb American watching a game of cricket right now.
Hey Wave I have something for you, pick up your game You've made me so sad so far
Yay I was mentioned in a 5k post!
I dunno I'm legit having a shit time right now. What have you got besides memorializing me forever in your milestone post?
Who are the serious candidates right now that I should look into? I feel like layabout is one of them but to me that essentially amounts to lurker lynch I thinks. Who else?
People I think could definitely be red: Layabout Val
People I don't have good feelings about: Slam Bunnies
One of these three is probably red but I don't feel like figuring it out atm: Steve HF Hapa
Look at these people wave, that should give you something at least.
can you explain this crazy unexplained thing?
Simple, ya'll have been pretty aggressively shitting up the thread (or at least it seems that way to me) and I figure one of you is probably scum. Time will sort it out so I'm not going lynch hunting in that clusterfuck right now.
On May 22 2014 11:15 Holyflare wrote: Austin what do you make of mz saying there's a red between me/hapa/steve because we're the ones shitting up the thread?
I think that MZ is giving short shrift to the other thread shitters or attempted-thread-shitters.
Actually upon further review of the play hapa is ok, I think I was mixing him up with someone else.
On the other hand, I find your defensiveness on this subject rather interesting HF. I didn't call you scum specifically, I only mentioned that one of you three probably was. None of the other two jumped on it.
On May 22 2014 11:28 Holyflare wrote: so why does mz have such a warped view of the thread then? can you explain that?
My friend you have an 11 page filter, no matter how you slice it there is truth to what I'm saying about you shitting up the thread. Whether you are scum or not is something I wasn't even going to get into today but since my poke has got you all riled up (which if you read my post is literally the weakest accusation I've made this game since it doesn't concretely point someone out), I suppose we can have this little dance today.
On May 22 2014 11:30 Holyflare wrote: up in arms? it's the opposite of defensive by the way, it's aggro at you for being so out-of-touch from the game
My dear Divine Blaze, you are the very definition of defensive right now, I hardly called you out and you responded. If my accusation was as baseless as you claim you could have just let it go. I didn't even go after you in particular but you felt threatened.
On May 22 2014 11:36 Holyflare wrote: i don't think many scum people have high pages of filter of active participation so i'm wondering why that's a legitimate heuristic for mz to have
Dude Dude Have you ever played mafia before? It's more than possible for scum to have large filters, and spammy and shitting up the thread is a legitimate scum tactic.
Just because you're active doesn't mean what you are contributing is valuable or even helpful.
On May 22 2014 11:30 Holyflare wrote: up in arms? it's the opposite of defensive by the way, it's aggro at you for being so out-of-touch from the game
My dear Divine Blaze, you are the very definition of defensive right now, I hardly called you out and you responded. If my accusation was as baseless as you claim you could have just let it go. I didn't even go after you in particular but you felt threatened.
no i'm not threatened i'm leaving no stone unturned and think you could easily be mafia for having no idea what's going on to be in the mind to even add that to a post of who you would lynch
ohhh not a good post at all.
First off you're OMGUSing. But more importantly, "leaving no stone unturned" is not actually protown in my experience because it shows an inherent guilt because you feel the need to defend yourself from every little thing. It's a scum mindset :/
Hey Kita, I understand you'd rather me not pursue this HF thing right now but his responses have piqued my interests. Since you're here, why don't you give me some suggestions of who else I could look at.
On May 22 2014 11:30 Holyflare wrote: up in arms? it's the opposite of defensive by the way, it's aggro at you for being so out-of-touch from the game
My dear Divine Blaze, you are the very definition of defensive right now, I hardly called you out and you responded. If my accusation was as baseless as you claim you could have just let it go. I didn't even go after you in particular but you felt threatened.
no i'm not threatened i'm leaving no stone unturned and think you could easily be mafia for having no idea what's going on to be in the mind to even add that to a post of who you would lynch
ohhh not a good post at all.
First off you're OMGUSing. But more importantly, "leaving no stone unturned" is not actually protown in my experience because it shows an inherent guilt because you feel the need to defend yourself from every little thing. It's a scum mindset :/
well then you need to rethink your scum mindsets there buddy and learn how i play the game
See unlike some people in this game I'm not gonna pretend that I'm such a great mafia player I can tell how someone else thinks. However the way you reacted has not looked good at all for you. Furthermore your OMGUS makes it look even worse. I don't really care how you play tbh, if your play is scummy though I'm gonna have to poke further.
On May 22 2014 11:51 Holyflare wrote: no absolutely you go after me if you think i'm scum, don't drop it because a player whose alignment you have no idea about asks you to look elsewhere
lol a) who said I'm going after you and b) who said I'm gonna stop poking you
On May 22 2014 11:50 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Hey Kita, I understand you'd rather me not pursue this HF thing right now but his responses have piqued my interests. Since you're here, why don't you give me some suggestions of who else I could look at.
Take your pick out of these four.
Valenius Wave poofter BlueyD
Well you already know my opinions on Wave and Val
Here's my opinion on BlueyD:
On May 21 2014 10:53 BlueyD wrote: Wasn't so convinced by the case on Valenius when I read it. His posts weren't pretend-contributions of the scummy type, they were just obviously irrelevant. [...]
On May 21 2014 13:36 BlueyD wrote: Ehhhh I'm back.
Don't like the case on bunnies, I feel like Ceph is stretching it. [...]
On May 21 2014 13:56 BlueyD wrote: I don’t like that the case on mtamburini seems to rely on a single post. It’s a really bad post due to format and scope, but the rest of the filter reads okay. [...]
On May 22 2014 09:58 BlueyD wrote: [...]
Ritoky: I just don’t see a case for a lynch on him right now. There are better targets. The case by austin was bad, and his reads feel honest.
Austin: One bad case, but he retracted it really quickly once some stuff was cleared up, so not much there. Mehhhh. I pretty much don’t have a good read on this guy.
Vale: There’s really only one post to analyse here, and half of it is fluff. His townreads are yellow and bkq (and bh? I dunno, the wording made it sound really weak) which is just weird to me. His only scum read is “Light shades of pink” on cav. Come on... Going to just count this as a pretend-to-help-town post since there's nothing in it I really like. On the scummy side.
I gotta be honest I have a huge problem with people who do stuff like this. Sure BlueyD has also said he finds Yellow and Tamburini lynch worthy, however there is no time spent pushing these reads. I have no idea why BlueyD's meta is but I could be swayed to a lynch on him today.
EPT
