EPTWhy don't you save scooby and velma instead for now.
Really Small Mafia - Page 12
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Why don't you save scooby and velma instead for now. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
A window. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On January 10 2014 16:39 Holyflare wrote: + Show Spoiler + On January 10 2014 08:14 Holyflare wrote: Team 2: Shaggy (raynpelikoneet) and Scrappy (Artanis[XP]) have decided to try the front gate. DUH! Scrappy and Yabba walk up the front gate. ![[image loading]](http://2012a2group1.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/jessie-j.png) A single crow sits atop the cast iron gate. The gate is very slightly ajar but even going near it gives you the creeps. Yikes! You just KNOW something bad will happen if you walk through that gate, the entrance to a haunted mansion can't be free from ghouls and ghosts, surely!? You have a choice which you must now reach between the BOTH of you. Do you: A) Try the gate anyway. DESPITE THE BAD VIBES AND FEELINGS. B) Back off and inspect the gate further. Maybe you missed something. C) FLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! Decision reached: A) Try the gate anyway. DESPITE THE BAD VIBES AND FEELINGS. Scrappy and Shaggy edge up to the ominous looking gate with the crow sitting on top. Shaggy: I got a real bad feeling about this Scrappy. Scrappy: PUPPPYYYYYYY POWERRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!! Scrappy charges into the gate headfirst! It swings open and the crow flies away. It turns it's head in the distance and Shaggy swears he see's the eyes of a human staring right back at him. Shaggy: Don't... no! Don't go. Come on, Scrappy Doo, don't do this. Please, don't go. Scrappy: Ghosts don't stand a chance with me! Let me at em!!! Let me at em!!! --------Scrappy and Shaggy walk through the gate only to end up on the same side they started on---------- Shaggy: Like, what's going on Scrappy? I could have sworn we were just here. *Scrappy tries again and again* Scrappy: I don't get it Shaggy, every time I go through the gate I end up back here again! Shaggy: Like, let's get out of here! *Shaggy and Scrappy turn around only to see the same gate now in front of them once again* Shaggy: Mary Jane isn't really helping right now! Scrappy:Who is she Shaggy? Shaggy: Just a timeless friend. How do we get out of here??? *Scrappy eyes some words on the gate bars* Scrappy: It says: A correct answer from either of you will be acceptable. Scrappy: Shaggy, OH SHAGGY! I KNOW IT! IT'S A HAMMER, RIGHT RIGHT? *Scrappy runs through the gate and ends up right where he was before* *Sadness spreads across his face* Shaggy: You know, I think I just might have got it! A window! *Shaggy walks through the gate and actually ends up INSIDE the mansion's grounds. Scrappy follows disheartendly* Shaggy: I definitely preferred being on the other side of that gate! What do you do now? A) Text the others the password to the gate and wait for them to arrive. B) Explore the compound briefly for clues. C) Both (reduction in clue searching ability!) | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
I really don't like my arguments being misrepresented by either you or HolyFlare, but I still think the way HolyFlare reacted to my pressure read more townie than the way a mafia might react. I will say that I think HolyFlare's logic for why he is confirmed town for getting to L-1 is circumstantial evidence in my opinion. Three people scumread him and three people had nothing to say about him. I don't think that in-of-itself reads anything but null. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On January 10 2014 17:28 Holyflare wrote: Also, templar, you are clearly not reading my posts if you are insinuating that I am making everyone else do all the work by "looking for clues". I AM SCOOBY DOO THE KIDNAPPED CHARACTER. Where do you think these clues are coming from? I post fluff and magically clues appear? No. That is clearly not the case. Why don't you save scooby and velma instead for now. Ok, maybe I read into you asking people to search for clues too literally as asking people to find the mafia. If you were only saying that as a part of your game then I took that to mean more than it did so woopsies - lol | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
Calling HF's minigame fluff and useless and then +1'ing it. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On January 10 2014 17:48 raynpelikoneet wrote: So you are basically accusing Derrida of the same thing you did? Calling HF's minigame fluff and useless and then +1'ing it. No because I was still actually scum hunting and provided a specific accusation against a specific individual whereas he just sheeped what I said without providing anything concrete. It just turns out I read too much into him asking for us all to "search for clues" so my scum read didn't ever really make sense on Holy | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On January 10 2014 17:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote: I didn't read his opening post as town at all. This is actually my second forum game too but you didn't see me trying to use that to gain favor in my intro post, I actually started trying to find scum. I still think Derrida is likely scum until he responds to my concerns or provides something that reads more town to me. I really don't like my arguments being misrepresented by either you or HolyFlare, but I still think the way HolyFlare reacted to my pressure read more townie than the way a mafia might react. I will say that I think HolyFlare's logic for why he is confirmed town for getting to L-1 is circumstantial evidence in my opinion. Three people scumread him and three people had nothing to say about him. I don't think that in-of-itself reads anything but null. There is nothing circumstantial whatsoever. My alignment is confirmed to myself (and others if they read the game(s)) and so I can remove myself from the equation. There is not a chance in sweet sweet hell that a bus occurs that fast into the day based on the same evidence appearing from every person on that wagon with such little filter from a person. No credit would be gained and they lose a potential ally. So either he is scum in which case rayn or giggletummy are mafia (something that doesn't seem that likely so far) or he is town (which is much much more probable) and by process of elimination at least 1 mafia are in the group of Templar, Artanis and Mocsta. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
Either Mocsta or Artanis bussed him (unlikely) or he's scum with any of You/Giggle/Rayn. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On January 10 2014 05:09 Derrida wrote: ^ Agreed, I am disliking this amount of fluff. We need to get back to reads. What do you guys think about Artanis playing along with the Scooby Doo scheme? How is this not a specific accusation? Or a specific question or whatever? I think it pretty clearly reads he is concerned about Artanis' play and wants to know what other people think about it. no? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On January 10 2014 17:55 GGTeMpLaR wrote: That might work for you but from my perspective the probability is flipped. Either Mocsta or Artanis bussed him (unlikely) or he's scum with any of You/Giggle/Rayn. You can retrieve scum reads from 8 posts of a filter? I'm am quite seriously impressed. You seem to KNOW that the guy is scum despite me linking an ACTUAL scum game of his from his last newbie game that looks nothing like this one so far. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On January 10 2014 17:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: How is this not a specific accusation? Or a specific question or whatever? I think it pretty clearly reads he is concerned about Artanis' play and wants to know what other people think about it. no? How is asking "what do you guys think of X doing Y?" an accusation? It's an extremely safe way to look like you're contributing to the discussion without actually putting yourself out in the open for anyone to read you or committing to any viewpoints. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
B) Explore the compound briefly for clues. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On January 10 2014 17:58 GGTeMpLaR wrote: How is asking "what do you guys think of X doing Y?" an accusation? It's an extremely safe way to look like you're contributing to the discussion without actually putting yourself out in the open for anyone to read you or committing to any viewpoints. On January 10 2014 04:53 Giggletummy wrote: What intentions and consequences do you ascribe to his posting? On January 10 2014 03:57 Giggletummy wrote: Any purely speculative thoughts based on people searching or not searching? On January 10 2014 05:11 Giggletummy wrote: GGTeMpLaR, LIGHTNING ROUND TIME. HF's buddy plays along or sits silently while HF posts? On January 10 2014 07:38 Giggletummy wrote: Cuz HolyFlare came into the game and made a spectacle of himself. For a couple hours into the game, that's still going to be townie for me. Artanis DID do a little read-giving, which I like more than what rayn has done. But I don't view him barking and whatnot as determinative of anything. His more recent post looks better. Derrida sounds like Doritos. On January 10 2014 09:00 Giggletummy wrote: mocsta, any comment on the derrida suspicions? These all fall under the same category of what you attribute to Deridadadadada being scum. Yet this guy has significantly more trolly posts inbetween and a substantially larger filter. Why is he not your target instead? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On January 10 2014 17:58 GGTeMpLaR wrote: How is asking "what do you guys think of X doing Y?" an accusation? It's an extremely safe way to look like you're contributing to the discussion without actually putting yourself out in the open for anyone to read you or committing to any viewpoints. That's how pretty much every game starts.. Especially when the setup is one where even bussing is really stupid. Besides that he put himself out there by agreeing with you about Holyflare. He just didn't call him scum because the reasons were pure BS. | ||
| ||
