|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 25 2014 01:03 WaveofShadow wrote:Is it scummy?
I'm not sure. gonzaw was kinda kidding around earlier, but mafia are in a fucking vile spot so stupidity like this is something I'd countenance. VE+you are pushing weird scumteam theories. Toad thinks Fool is townier than sand voters. kita is oddly on the sidelines. In your favour is that you are here.
Whether you're mafia or not, though, I don't get this whole line of anything.
Could Prome+sandro be mafia together? Yes, it's possible
Is there any particular reason why this should be the case? No, not really.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Let's try this for the moment.
##Vote: VisceraEyes
Come play, sweetcheeks.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
It's not a 'lead', we lynched mafia on day 1. How many games can you think of where town lost after lynching mafia on day 1?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Random thought: how on earth does VE have 7 pages of filter? O.o
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Aww Wave <3
you never bitch when I'm thread bully. <3
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 25 2014 01:24 gonzaw wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 01:22 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 25 2014 01:15 gonzaw wrote:WoS, please, let me get this straight:You think, there are 3 scum: X, Y and Z. You think scum X bussed scum Y ALL D1, without wavering, without changing his vote or even attempting to change his mind, and doing so up until the final minutes of the lynch You think Z casted suspicon on Y, and 30 minutes before deadline decided to bus Y You also think, that immediately after that, Y decides to come to the thread and bus X back. All of this, while this is the votecount at the time: (X): 4 votes (Y): 4 votes (Z): 1 vote You are going to tell me, not a SINGLE townie had a vote on them by the end of D1 (not taking into account Holy's wasted vote). You are going to tell me, that scum made a plan, where they cross-bus each other, vote NO ONE other than each other, end up with ALL THREE OF THEM having votes, and (again BECAUSE THIS IS IMPORTANT) end up with NO TOWNIE HAVING A VOTE ON THEM AT ALL. Not only this, you are going to tell me that scum were completely happy with this (check Prome and Foo's behaviour at the deadline, they were pretty calm about it). You are also going to tell me, that after whatever sick plan they had, which involved getting X lynched, crumbled when a last minute switch to Z happened, then Y was still calm as fuck (even though their whole convoluted complex bussing plan they've been trying to perfect for hours and hours just crumbled at their feet) and even decided to jump on the bandwagon when he had stated in the thread he thought Z to not be that scummy and could be bad town. WoS, repeat what I've just saidDo it, with a straight face. On January 25 2014 01:03 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 25 2014 01:01 marvellosity wrote:
This is stupid. Is it scummy? If you keep up with this absolutely. Oh I see and so if you magically convince me now, all of a sudden I'm off the hook? lol what a joke. I see EXACTLY the problem VE was having. You leave absolutely no room for anything other than your current views when talking to either of us. Considering this, and the fact that we still try and converse with you and you have no intention of changing your mind in the slightest (me more so than VE) I think it's a fucking miracle that anybody would continue. Well WOS, only you and VE seem to have that problem (I don't see Toad nor kita complaining). Both of you came up with this ridiculous idea of the Foo/sandro/Prome scumteam. Coincidence?
gonzaw... lol.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 25 2014 01:28 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 01:24 gonzaw wrote:On January 25 2014 01:22 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 25 2014 01:15 gonzaw wrote:WoS, please, let me get this straight:You think, there are 3 scum: X, Y and Z. You think scum X bussed scum Y ALL D1, without wavering, without changing his vote or even attempting to change his mind, and doing so up until the final minutes of the lynch You think Z casted suspicon on Y, and 30 minutes before deadline decided to bus Y You also think, that immediately after that, Y decides to come to the thread and bus X back. All of this, while this is the votecount at the time: (X): 4 votes (Y): 4 votes (Z): 1 vote You are going to tell me, not a SINGLE townie had a vote on them by the end of D1 (not taking into account Holy's wasted vote). You are going to tell me, that scum made a plan, where they cross-bus each other, vote NO ONE other than each other, end up with ALL THREE OF THEM having votes, and (again BECAUSE THIS IS IMPORTANT) end up with NO TOWNIE HAVING A VOTE ON THEM AT ALL. Not only this, you are going to tell me that scum were completely happy with this (check Prome and Foo's behaviour at the deadline, they were pretty calm about it). You are also going to tell me, that after whatever sick plan they had, which involved getting X lynched, crumbled when a last minute switch to Z happened, then Y was still calm as fuck (even though their whole convoluted complex bussing plan they've been trying to perfect for hours and hours just crumbled at their feet) and even decided to jump on the bandwagon when he had stated in the thread he thought Z to not be that scummy and could be bad town. WoS, repeat what I've just saidDo it, with a straight face. On January 25 2014 01:03 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 25 2014 01:01 marvellosity wrote:
This is stupid. Is it scummy? If you keep up with this absolutely. Oh I see and so if you magically convince me now, all of a sudden I'm off the hook? lol what a joke. I see EXACTLY the problem VE was having. You leave absolutely no room for anything other than your current views when talking to either of us. Considering this, and the fact that we still try and converse with you and you have no intention of changing your mind in the slightest (me more so than VE) I think it's a fucking miracle that anybody would continue. Well WOS, only you and VE seem to have that problem (I don't see Toad nor kita complaining). Both of you came up with this ridiculous idea of the Foo/sandro/Prome scumteam. Coincidence? Nope, it's the reason I've been considering him town. Go ahead and tell me your post is not bias right now. Tell me how likely it is that as scum I'd take the difficult way out here, hard defend my scumbuddy ALL GAME rather than acquiesce quietly. It's waaaayyyyy more likely that I am wrong about VE than we are both scum. KISS.
This is getting ridiculous.
Are you really KISSING given your current theory?
Can we move on to something that isn't this? This isn't helping me getting a read on you really.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Really, we should all just KISS.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Wave: Toad stuff maybe.
The problem with this whole conversation is this:
a)townie paranoia and weird connection theory
b)mafia inventing some theory and sticking to it
???
Or maybe - are you voting Foolishness? Or what's going to happen there?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'm definitely giving Wave shifty sideways glances.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
At this stage though, WoS is at least trying and VE is not.
Not entertaining wifomy shit about that either.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Apparently I do the Wave/WoS thing as well...
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Be more interesting if he did you tbh.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Basically being petulant :p
kita is more interesting, if Wave has things to do first then that'll probably line up with when I get around to looking at kita again. Although I kinda want to wait until kita has done his latest round of posting.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 25 2014 04:24 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 04:12 gonzaw wrote:
Toad, what do you think about Foolishness' attitude towards you and your predecessor?
I.e instantly finding Holy scummy (because of my case), but never doing anything else about it (other than fleetingly mention him a few times), to him being his 2nd scum read after Prome, to him not mentioning him nor you AT ALL after he had a 100% change of heart on Prome? No idea, I haven't read a single post from Holyflare so no idea if his accusations on my predecessor as you coined it so nicely make sense, btw also something WoS mentioned about me how I kept the reads from Holy... I didn't even know that lol I did ignore it in general as I was seeing the same thing from foolishness about Sandro and it was so extreme that I just thought it has to be an exaggeration until austin pointed out that is indeed weird. He has been on Sandro for a while, called him mafia and suddendly started calling the lynch bad and wasn't willing to vote him. Haven't put too much thought into it. I had to catch up, I had to reread a bunch and as stupid as this situation may be I just can't catch up, reread and at the same time put the same amount of time into reading yet other filters as you guys are doing right now. I have to make this work somehow and I start out with what's #1 on my priority list. Just saying because you still don't seem to understand the situation I'm in. Yes a bunch of stuff I'm going to say will be less in detail than stuff you do and I don't have the time to do proper research like you guys. That's to be expected and there's nothing I can do about that. Yes I'm slightly angry about the fact that you've basicly called me out about not reading carefully enough... Yeah I'm explaining it from the Sandro <-> Foolish perspective but it seems to be the same thing you're getting at? Because like I said I haven't read Holy's posts.
How is this possible if you've read the game? ...
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
the bullshit is strong with this one.
VE can you answer kita please?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
it's nothing to do with reading his filter, it's the totally unnatural idea that you're reading a game and for some totally bizarre reason you decide to ignore one user's posts despite the fact that the rest of the game is reading and responding to those posts, so you have no contextual idea of what you're reading from anyone else regarding that user. That's really what you did?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 04:29 kitaman27 wrote:On January 25 2014 04:23 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, and he was last on the wagon - whether it was a minute or 10 minutes, he voted last on the wagon and was NOT the hammer vote on sandroba. Do you think it's likely that scum sandroba moved the lynch from 2-3 to 3-3 onto a scum Prom? I mean if it was his last act in the game then I don't see why not - especially if you're talking about the 2-3 vote being onto prom, as if this is plurality lynch then the other guy would have been voted off anyway.
the point is, Foolishness exists
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
probably ignore what i said and listen to kita instead
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
that's what I was getting at, badly ^
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
