EPT##unvote
##vote: sandroba
[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
##unvote ##vote: sandroba | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Fool/kita/Prome/WoS are others for various reasons. I'll probably chat at length about it tomorrow. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 23 2014 08:09 austinmcc wrote: When this game is over, I need the story behind marv's signature... TL Mafia Community Thread | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
See y'all tomorrow. welcome toad also | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 22 2014 13:00 kitaman27 wrote: There is one thing that I disagree with in Foolishness's assessment. He states that sandroba has had a strong appearance and has brought things to the thread. I don't see it so far. When he rejoined the thread, his re-enterence was extremely vanilla. He asked Foolishness about his WoS, which had already been beaten to death and he gave a softball to marv. His statement about Prom wasn't really anything new that he brought to the thread. I'm always hesitant to go after sandroba because I know a lot of the time he goes long periods of time without contributing much and then bursts into the thread with a great case. However, there is a distinct lack of aggressiveness in his posts and after 30 hours into the game, if he can't be bothered to play, that's on him, not me. -snip- @Foolishness, was there anything in particular that made you eliminate sandroba from lynch consideration? ##Unvote ##Sandroba That's actually a not-bad case against sandroba as it goes for that time of the day. On January 22 2014 23:18 kitaman27 wrote: My vote is on sandroba. I suppose you could call it policy. I'd much rather lynch him now, over an individual who is playing if he isn't going to contribute. I also expect more than one big post if he does return. I hadn't looked into Prom/Holy/yourself since your names are coming up the most often. I will certainly change my vote from sandroba if I find someone that I'm confident about. Possibly even slightly less than confident. I really wish people would vote sooner though, even if they need to change their mind. This seems like it is going towards the path where everyone shows up with their vote an hour or two before the lynch. But it's policy? Don't really think saying that is scummy in particular, but it does devalue his case a little. Also indicates willingness to change his vote off sand. On January 23 2014 07:07 kitaman27 wrote: Rather than getting replaced, I believe sandroba prefers this approach: Sandroba: whoa 3 minutes from the lynch already? Sorry guys, I've been much more busy partying than I intended. I'll be sure to catch up tomorrow, I swear. Sandroba Day 2: LOL NOPE. Pretty sarcastic post but it suggests the mindset of kita thinking sandroba is mafia I guess. On January 23 2014 07:51 kitaman27 wrote: I'm happy where I am, so you should join me.[Prome rather than sandro - marv] Asking austin to join him on Prome rather than sandro. Possible mafia motivation, but meh, can easily be town wanting to lynch Prome really. Actually I don't care so much about all those posts so much. Mostly put it there so sand-kita stuff is together. It's the bit right near the deadline that makes me feel icky On January 23 2014 07:59 kitaman27 wrote: So prom, you're given the deciding vote and contradict yourself from minutes earlier? I really don't like this. It's pretty obvious Prome was just joining in the shenannies, and he'd indicated he was fine with a sand lynch previously. So what's the problem? Did kita really find sand's posts when he came back convincing, incl. the one on Prome, to stay on Prome and then chastise Prome like this? Suspicious. And a muted post-lynch reaction too. I hate how kita approached the lynch + deadline stuff in general, but it's kinda mitigated by the fact that flicking through his filter, there seems to be a genuine crapload of effort in there, just looking at players in depth. Don't think I'd lynch kita over VE atm. Need more Wave/Toad especially also. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 24 2014 01:51 gonzaw wrote: You just called him town there. Not scum = town. Or are you going with that weird "if he is scum, then the reason for him being scum is not his vote on me" reasoning there? If it's the latter it was worded badly On January 24 2014 01:36 Promethelax wrote: My 5 point scale puts 3 as null sand was on the scum side of null. I didn't find it totally impossible that town sand would come out with an ass backwards awful case on me. Syllo did the same thing in chronotrigger and the two of them are one person in my mind. He was never town in my head but he was scummy for lurking not for anything in particular. I don't think you know how to read though buddy. When I said that sandro was capable of bad play as town I meant he was capable of bad play as town not that he was, in this case, bad town. He deserved a lynch for being a lurker not for posting a bad case. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 24 2014 01:54 gonzaw wrote: So marv, you have no problems with Prome's actions regarding sandro at the deadline then? It still seems a little bit strange. I'd have OMGUSed the shit out of sandro. Why would mafia-Prome be less likely to than town-Prome?? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 22 2014 02:27 sandroba wrote: Most of his interactions seem a bit fake and force to me. It looks like he is doing stuff because he is supposed to be doing that stuff as town, but it doesn't look natural. I.E. that first post, than the whole hapa interaction, seems like he was fishing for it for no real reason other than to look ok. The comment about you knowing him so well after you said he looks like he is bullshitting isn't sitting so well either. This is literally the only commentary of suspicion on anyone in the early game for sandroba. And he carries it through to later. As far as I'm aware, sand isn't particularly known for just bussing his team-mates for no reason right out the gate. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
sand knows that he's the liability so he's planning on getting lynched day 1 and making his team-mates look good for it. So kita votes him early so he has that nice early vote and makes sarcastic comments about how sandroba usually just afks. but kita can't vote for sand in the end because kita needs credz for later when Prome maybe flips, so kita votes for Prome so that kita and Prome are well distanced. Now Prome doesn't omgus sand because he's playing the "sand can be bad as town card" for cheesecake credit, but in the end joins in the shenannies at the last minute to look good, after sand comes in with a case on Prome so that sand is making a case on Prome who ends up voting for both kita and sand through the day and kita votes for both of them too but has his vote on Prome at the end so there's this massive big circle where none of them can be mafia but they are actually mafia because that's clearly what's going on. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 24 2014 02:11 gonzaw wrote: You forgot the part where Foolishness is a traitor and this is bastard game. Now you're being silly. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
| ||
