EPTOn January 22 2014 07:19 Foolishness wrote:
Questionable players
Austin
sandroba
marvellosity
Holyflare
Gonzaw
This is roughly in order of most to least town. Austin and sandroba might as well be afk until 3 pages ago, but since coming to the thread both have had strong appearances. I'm okay with them right now because they have brought things to the thread, and it is also obvious that if they continue their activity then they are town. If they keep going afk for long periods of time then start to worry. But I don't feel like that will happen.
The following 3 people are all in the ? category. Marvellosity and Holyflare in particular because for all that they have said I don't feel they have really contributed much. Even as I'm writing this I'm thinking back, "what has marvellosity or holyflare done this game", and I cannot remember a single post they have made. That's a bad sign. Anything mafia indicative off the bat? No so much, but then seem to be here without actually being here.
Questionable players
Austin
sandroba
marvellosity
Holyflare
Gonzaw
This is roughly in order of most to least town. Austin and sandroba might as well be afk until 3 pages ago, but since coming to the thread both have had strong appearances. I'm okay with them right now because they have brought things to the thread, and it is also obvious that if they continue their activity then they are town. If they keep going afk for long periods of time then start to worry. But I don't feel like that will happen.
The following 3 people are all in the ? category. Marvellosity and Holyflare in particular because for all that they have said I don't feel they have really contributed much. Even as I'm writing this I'm thinking back, "what has marvellosity or holyflare done this game", and I cannot remember a single post they have made. That's a bad sign. Anything mafia indicative off the bat? No so much, but then seem to be here without actually being here.
On January 22 2014 09:22 Foolishness wrote:
I still stand by that marvellosity is a big mystery this game. He's not our lynch today but everyone should have at least one eye on him.
I still stand by that marvellosity is a big mystery this game. He's not our lynch today but everyone should have at least one eye on him.
On January 23 2014 05:20 Foolishness wrote:
To explain Austin, at the time I made that post where you and sandroba are together, you and him had both shown up to the thread and posted a couple times, but that was it. My thinking was that, "okay, as long as these guys are here and continue to post they should be town". This especially applies to sandroba because he is known for being really inactive as mafia.
You're here and posting, should be obvious that you are town. He's not here and not posting, and that speaks volumes for him.
To explain Austin, at the time I made that post where you and sandroba are together, you and him had both shown up to the thread and posted a couple times, but that was it. My thinking was that, "okay, as long as these guys are here and continue to post they should be town". This especially applies to sandroba because he is known for being really inactive as mafia.
You're here and posting, should be obvious that you are town. He's not here and not posting, and that speaks volumes for him.
On January 23 2014 05:44 Foolishness wrote:
Marvellosity. He's posted a bunch and hasn't done anything. Can you tell me without looking at his filter something that marvellosity has done for the town this game?
+ Show Spoiler +
Marvellosity. He's posted a bunch and hasn't done anything. Can you tell me without looking at his filter something that marvellosity has done for the town this game?
+ Show Spoiler +
The real answer to your question is "both"
On January 22 2014 02:05 sandroba wrote:
@foolishness let's chat a bit. What's indicative of scum mentality in that WoS post you quoted? I don't really see it.
@marv besides foolishness whoelse do you think it's worth looking into?
@foolishness let's chat a bit. What's indicative of scum mentality in that WoS post you quoted? I don't really see it.
@marv besides foolishness whoelse do you think it's worth looking into?
On January 22 2014 02:19 sandroba wrote:
I don't have a problem with kita. He was one of the first people to try to get the thread rolling and I agree with his recent comment on gonzaw's post. Prom and gonzaw are the ones giving me weird vibes so far, maybe foolishness, but I need more from him before I can tell.
I don't have a problem with kita. He was one of the first people to try to get the thread rolling and I agree with his recent comment on gonzaw's post. Prom and gonzaw are the ones giving me weird vibes so far, maybe foolishness, but I need more from him before I can tell.
So what the fuck is going on here? In the first post, Foolishness is "sandroba's entrance was fine" - I believe this was picked up by multiple people who questioned it - and we never got an answer as far as I can see from Foolish's filter, despite being asked by more than one person (pls don't say i missed it thanks). Also that sandroba is fine as long as he continues posting. sandroba has not continued posting. So... moving on with Foolish's posts, he prefers to lynch me over sandroba on a "general feeling", despite the fact that by his own metric he should really want to be lynching sandroba pretty fucking hard right now.
sand asked Foolish (and me T.T) some really random question, and then in the 2nd post follows this up by randomly tacking Foolish on as someone who is "maybe" giving him scumvibes, as an afterthought. Scum/scum? (connection bad blabla, not going to lynch on this).
Actually Foolish's posts towards sandroba are exceptionally weak and contradictory in that he's basically not following through on his promises to bust sandroba's ass, which he really should be if sandroba is only fine if he continues posting - and sandroba was only fine in the first place because his posts showed some thought (did they really?)Foolish has kinda rumbled that sand is mafia but... yeah. Let me show something from Liar Game analysis:
On May 25 2012 13:49 Ver wrote:
Day 1:
Right out the gate on page 6 we have some nice baseline standards for accountability:
I love when people make these kinds of statements. It gives you something concrete to hold them accountable to. It doesn't matter that it's a bad idea to tunnel, but now if you don't see EchelonTee following up on this that is a huge hint. Looking through his filter, he doesn't really have any comments on this other than a wishy-washy statement about how he could be mafia but isn't apathetic. Classic mafia overreaction to trying to distance themselves from their team. Even though it isn't conclusive, its a good start. One method would be to push for a sandroba lynch and see if EchelonTee responds like he says he would.
Incognito's Analysis:
Day 1:
Right out the gate on page 6 we have some nice baseline standards for accountability:
I love when people make these kinds of statements. It gives you something concrete to hold them accountable to. It doesn't matter that it's a bad idea to tunnel, but now if you don't see EchelonTee following up on this that is a huge hint. Looking through his filter, he doesn't really have any comments on this other than a wishy-washy statement about how he could be mafia but isn't apathetic. Classic mafia overreaction to trying to distance themselves from their team. Even though it isn't conclusive, its a good start. One method would be to push for a sandroba lynch and see if EchelonTee responds like he says he would.
(((( Sorry for the resources you spent looking into me :x!
