|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On January 21 2014 23:07 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2014 22:51 gonzaw wrote:
Fluff o clock just happens to be at the same time as my foot massage time Promy prom
Im at work. Skimmed and theres too much blablabla ill ignore.
Ill gladly focus on foo and maybe marvy when i get home. But right now, marv is right, unless anything more interestong happens foolishness should be D1 lynch. WHY CANT YOU BE TOWM FOO I REALLY WANT YOU TO!!
Im scared of kita since he seems to have that umreadable type of attitude when playing and pressuring. Doesnt help he gets into fluffy discussions and shit. Why Foolishness over sandroba? They have both posted nothing. Your goal is clearly to lynch a lurker today so why are you going to ignore the rest of what has happened on day 1 when your intentions are already set in stone?
The wording of this question doesn't make sense, because the red follows logically from the green, no?
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Are you suggesting that gonzaw is so sure that Foolish is mafia that he should be trying to parse an argument at work to find yet another mafia??
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Maybe Hero mafia gonzaw
I bussed Adam because Palmar caught him red-handed and if I didn't bus him we were both going down
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
You believe incorrectly dear.
What do you think you or town are gaining by asking me that question about Fool?
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
An offsite game? Pish :p me and Fool have a longer history than that... ^^ Kinda tangentially, spoke to Fool after that game, because I said he'd fooled me in that game for the first couple cycles, and he mentioned he tried harder that game than usual as scum.
This game is pretty different to normal because as a general rule I tend to go for unimportant/quiet players on Day 1, and in this game that type of player simply doesn't exist.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=387370¤tpage=6#120
His first vote in that game (2nd or 3rd post in his filter) is unexplained twaddle too.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
not sure i should have explained that last bit yet actually. never mind.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On January 22 2014 01:16 VisceraEyes wrote:
Morning guys. Marv no, I don't think it's the same kind of Prome that I'm used to seeing. What it reminds me of is that game I was the mayor and lynched the piss out of Prome D1. He was a lurky little shit that game, but I caught him on something very similar to what I noticed this game. Like I think it's awful that I have to ask this, but did you read my post on him?
That being said, I at least dig one of his targets. I asked Foolish about his thoughts on this same matter and what I got is "lol you and Hapa townies" which is definitely NOT what I was after. He answered my question as if he'd read the exchange between us, but left me with a feeling that he hadn't actually read anything at all.
If I see one more person say they're going to ignore my posts, I won't be responsible for the outcome. You have been warned.
Pretty sure I saw you post in another game rather recently that you were ignoring someone else's posts... taken the ole hypocrite-tea, have we? And as you well know I always read everyone's posts, so yes, you should feel awful for asking that. Bad VE.
You're talking about LX, and no it doesn't really feel the same.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
gonzaw, marv is on Fool, so obviously town isn't going to be ignoring Fool. Because marv.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
kita, you're vaguely insinuating things, is that where you're leaving it? Or are you just lecturing gonzaw. if so, why?
all of those questions are pointless to answer or rhetorical.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
you have a lot of funny questions in your filter kita.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On January 22 2014 02:05 sandroba wrote:
@foolishness let's chat a bit. What's indicative of scum mentality in that WoS post you quoted? I don't really see it.
@marv besides foolishness whoelse do you think it's worth looking into?
I dunno yet. I find quite a few of kita's questions odd (especially taken all together), but I dunno if it's scummy-odd or just kita-odd atm.
Then there's a bunch of people I have no idea about who need to post more, and a couple of light townreads. That is all
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
@VE - Prome's filter looks less town than I remember it feeling as I read through the thread at the time, but still not really seeing the issues that you have with it either. Or rather I see them, but don't really find them scummy.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
kita - it's so funny that I've had to stop myself laughing at all, because I fear that if I start laughing, then my head might fall off.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Can you tell me more about Prome, sand?
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I'm still trying to understand what it's saying/who it's saying it about actually
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
that was to kita's post/VE rather than sand
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
austin the issue wasn't whether Prome justified the difference, but whether what he did makes him scummy or not. You're 1-0ing something that wasn't even really a point of contention
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On January 22 2014 04:25 austinmcc wrote:
We can skip the yes/no portion I guess...
If you like Prome's explanation, I'm interested in hearing about that. If you don't, then you think Prome (1) is silly or (2) gave a false reason and/or (3) doesn't have a reason?
If you don't like Prome's explanation and it's (2) or (3), then whether there was a point of contention or not is irrelevant, except that it SHOULD be a point of contention. In my book, making up or having a very weak justification for treating in a different manner two people who do the same thing is a scummy thing (which is the mindset I find myself in at the moment, that yes, what he did was scummy because I don't buy that justification)
Just popping in between exercise and dinner, i'll go find kita's stuff a bit later.
Mostly 1, maybe a touch of 3? It's just something I don't find very surprising. I've often remarked to Prome that I find his opening to games bad/weak/scummy because he makes senseless accusations/stupid fluff/whatever.
Really (and this is to VE mostly I guess) I don't really care so much about him doing that at the start of the game, nor Hapa either, because it's what they do. The difference between here and LX is that on LX it was abundantly clear he was on the backfoot about his RNG plan, here his defence was on the frontfoot (partly *because* he didn't try to overjustify it again and again) and he simply moved on from it.
I sincerely wish I found it as interesting as you and VE seem to :p
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
