EPT[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Prome, where the fuck were you this time? Thinking about you as mafia is suddenly making me feel all dirty. On January 29 2014 11:06 WaveofShadow wrote: As second place scum you should be concerned about me. Everybody else was concerned about the entire scumteam. Do you understand why this looks so dodgy to me? You are making excuses and trying to pass your scumread off as 'not really a legit read because it doesn't matter but maybe I would have lynched you.' Which is just hilarious given the ONE THING that austin decided Prome was mafia for. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 29 2014 07:25 austinmcc wrote: Agreed. I'm behaving oddly for either alignment this game, but I know that today has been really off for my towngame. Yeah... just... mm. Can you explain why at all austin? This is more so it's here for me to muse on when I feel like it at some point. Easier to do mechanical work when your mojo is slightly deflated :p On January 23 2014 07:38 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Vote Count - Deadline at Wednesday, Jan 22 10:59pm GMT (GMT+00:00) Foolishness (4): VisceraEyes, gonzaw, WaveofShadow, Promethelax, Promethelax (4): Foolishness, Kitaman27, Sandroba, Hapahauli, Sandroba (1): marvellosity, Kitaman27 (0): WaveOfShadow (0): HolyFlare (0): Hapahauli (0): VisceraEyes (0): Not voted (2): Austinmcc, HolyFlare If you notice a mistake, please let us know! Currently Foolishness is set to be lynched for reaching 4 votes first. On January 23 2014 07:48 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Vote Count - Deadline at Wednesday, Jan 22 10:59pm GMT (GMT+00:00) Foolishness (6): VisceraEyes, gonzaw, WaveofShadow, Promethelax, marvellosity, Hapahauli, Promethelax (3): Foolishness, Kitaman27, Sandroba, gonzaw (1): HolyFlare Sandroba (0): Kitaman27 (0): WaveOfShadow (0): HolyFlare (0): Hapahauli (0): VisceraEyes (0): Not voted (1): Austinmcc If you notice a mistake, please let us know! Currently Foolishness is set to be lynched. On January 23 2014 08:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Please stop posting. Final Vote Count - Deadline at Wednesday, Jan 22 10:59pm GMT (GMT+00:00) Sandroba (5): gonzaw, austinmcc, marvellosity, Hapahauli, Promethelax, Promethelax (3): Foolishness, Kitaman27, Sandroba, Foolishness (2): VisceraEyes, WaveofShadow, gonzaw (1): HolyFlare Kitaman27 (0): WaveOfShadow (0): HolyFlare (0): Hapahauli (0): VisceraEyes (0): Not voted (0) If you notice a mistake, please let us know! Sandroba is set to be lynched. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 29 2014 20:55 Promethelax wrote: I did. His and marv's were both scummy. Sand is a detriment to his team. When he is up against two townies in me and foolishness you need to make sure you look good from his flip because it will come d1 or d2. So quick switching around deadline when I had clearly had foolish as more scummy and Hapa wasn't present was an easy way to do that. Scum expected not to get sand lynched d1 but to look good from having voted him but Hapa and I went over in the last two minutes and scum could not change their votes, they were stuck on sand. The middle votes were scummy. On top of that the scum shots have all been into the group of players who voted sand to reinforce the idea that everyone on that vote was town. Shooting outside of it would have been fine to eliminate players like Kita who had no suspicion on him and is a better analyst than Gonzaw. But they needed the idea of fool's to take hold. Voting mafia on day 1 definitely scummy. Got it. To the bold: so if I'm mafia, I'm making a massive gamble that neither Hapa NOR Prome NOR VE (in your scenario) will move over after what sand had posted? That's a bit of a stretch isn't it? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Comments like this aren't helping. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 29 2014 21:10 Promethelax wrote: Two scenerios 1. Scummarv -you know based on me not being your buddy in your role pm 2. Townmarv -you know because you know me and my play and I'm clearly town this game Either way you know. Which is fun because either you are town and will defend me from a lynch or you are scum and you have to pretend to defend me from a lynch because you know town you would. You overestimate either me, yourself, or you misunderstand the state of the game, if you think I have reason to be confident of your alignment right now my friend. And I don't like that you're pushing this at me. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Snippets from the case: I see this as being a scum player trying to change his day1 town play for something else and excusing it in the thread unnecessarily. This post so gloriously misunderstands what I said that it cannot come from town. Austin fluffs hard for a while d1 when Fool and Sand are being brought up a lot. He spends most of day one talking about how I am scum and about random fluff like marv's love of tentacles. One of those things is productive, the other is a lot of effort put into looking casual. You can have issues with the case, but not because he wasn't looking individually at you or your alignment, that's wrong. One interesting thing about the case is that he goes from This is just a side note but if Fool is scum this post is scum as shit. It is very directly trying to remove discussion from Fool. I can hear the chainsaw revving in the background. to This seems to point against a fool/sand/austin team. I don't see fool (a not bad player) lumping his two scum budddies together in this way. This is simply not how a scum refers to all of their team during d1 when two scum players are under suspicion. I'm quite curious to hear how you view the 2 quotes as a thought process or whatever, austin. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
kita: alright, will do. just popping in pre-exercise at the moment though. I do remember finding a quote from Prome's filter at some stage that made it seem quite unlikely to me that Prome was mafia with Holyflare(toad) though. I think you even commented on it. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Sadly there's 0 chance I get shot now, so I'll play hard next cycle. My one phobia is snakes. Ew. We need to really properly talk at some point tomorrow austin (on the not particularly dangerous assumption we'll still both be here :p), I need to see what your thoughts on me are really made of. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
And yeah, I never came back with a firm read on you. Mainly because I'd start looking at you and not really find what I was looking for (whatever that was) I'm not really sure what you're suggesting my angle is here... keeping my options open or something? when most people see you as much townier than I was seeing you? That doesn't really work. Fool's towncase really finally firmed up my read on you. Did a really cursory check of what he suggested and he made strong points. At the time I thought he included the towncase on you to look legit while he pushed other bad arguments on Prome and Toad. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Again with the stuff on Holy/Toad, it seemed like he was purposefully picking out trolly comments from back to the basics to try to make holy look town here, even though holy had properly tryharded in other scumgames like lxiii and hogwarts. i couldn't find those 'holes' in the kita analysis. Maybe just because I know holy and prome better than i know kita, i don't know. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 30 2014 07:58 kitaman27 wrote: I suppose I'll take that over Foolishness's proof that I'm mentally insane -_- ha  gg kita. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On January 30 2014 02:59 kitaman27 wrote: Re: sandroba's vote on Prom day one. The biggest reason that I was hesitant on my suspicion of Prom after pushing him on day one was the 3-3 vote by sandroba. I saw marv mention that sandroba wasn't a player that likes to bus and I kinda assumed it was true as I didn't spend the time to verify this was true. I spent time looking at how sandroba addresses scum buddies at the beginning of the game with the "@" symbol and didn't come to any conclusions, but I never looked at his early game voting record. I'm pretty upset with myself considering what I have found: sandroba and L are scum buddies this game. Provides no case, but votes for his scum buddy sinani. Scum buddies with Fishball in a 2 player game. Votes him on day one without much of a case and shows he is willing to take risks early. Day one vote against his scum buddy. No case, limited time from sandroba. There is a dt check on RoL here, but votes are coming in on the dt instead, yet sandroba votes his buddy. Look at sandroba's explanation for his day two bus on his scum buddy annul. This sounds incredibly similar to this game. Not only is sandroba willing to bus early, he actually does it more often than not! | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
His, imo, unreasonably strong townread on Toad/Holy based on almost nothing. His attack on Prome for a really weird reason that still no-one has agreed with, and yet for some reason he's particularly suspicious of me for not agreeing with it. The fact he's always come in super-late to push any lynch, on every single day so far. His 100% absurd attack on me for when I said "vote your strongest read" when in context it was fucking obvious I was talking about day 3. I clarified and he continued the attack on the same basis. It's totally absurd that he's really trying to catch me out for being "hypocritical" for day 1 reads and voting compared to day 3 actions. Anyways, tell me what you're seeing that makes you confident in his alignment, plox. | ||
| ||
