[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia - Page 15

Foolishness and VE weren't playing well, otherwise we wouldn't have lynched them. So trusting thier reads on me is silly to the point of scummy.

On February 01 2014 02:31 marvellosity wrote:
Gonna try answer me / the rest of austin's questions, twinkletoes?

On November 02 2012 19:33 risk.nuke wrote:
We're still killing Muso for not having a partner. While prplhz/Promethelax was suspicious Muso is basically busted scum.

On November 02 2012 20:55 Acrofales wrote:

I suggest to just read the thread and do some traditional behavioural analysis. I like my vote on prplhz (sorry Promethelax, your predecssor said some stuff that I cannot jibe with town).

@Kushm4sta: you're not thinking straight. Also, blame Bugs for my rolename.

On November 02 2012 21:48 Acrofales wrote:
Prplhz
What initially made my scumdar ping was this passage:

He pre-excuses his lack of activity (although now that he was replaced we can safely assume this was not a ploy, but a simple headsup: it still got my attention at the time, though) and chums up to quite a number of players for no good reason: he indicates that thrown2112, kushm4sta and Hopeless1der should see him as town. He further chums up with Mattchew, Muso and Release by calling them town, when the game is about 12 hours old. I personally didn't have a town read yet on anybody and found this passage decidedly strange.

However, prplhz slipped badly in the claiming ordeal, which I explained earlier and Muso fleshed out in sufficient detail.

Note that this case ONLY works if Muso is in fact town. If Muso is scum, then prplhz has no reason to be so surprised. So the question is what case you think is better on its own. A compounding problem is that prplhz will not be around to explain himself and Promethelax cannot explain it, obviously.

Also, gonna bring in the meta-lynch-all-replacements rule: it is more likely to replace scum in this manner than to replace town. I don't like using moderator actions to hunt scum, but it is something that is a simple truth. Losing a townie to inactivity is not the end of the world. Losing scum in a similar manner is extremely bad for the game.

On November 02 2012 23:13 Acrofales wrote:
About 8 hours left. It seems time to consolidate.

Out of Kush and prplhz, against who the main body of the case is similar, I feel prplhz has shown more dodgy behaviour. At least kush's switch came after the majority of the thread had weighed in and said they weren't Muso's mason partner: prplhz did his 180 (thanks for that reminder in your filter, risk) with only my statistics to persuade him in the meantime.

I don't feel particularly happy pushing for a lynch on someone who has just subbed in, but the worst thing possible is a no-lynch today: we need that flip information.

PS: if the aim is to get information from a lynch, Muso will give info if he flips town (namely, a stronger case against prplhz and kush), whereas prplhz and kush are dudds if they flip town, so that is a point in favour of killing Muso. However, I feel prplhz is FAR more likely to flip scum at this point and killing scum is my goal.

Re-voting for emphasis:
##vote Promethelax

On February 01 2014 03:31 marvellosity wrote:
You should know very well I'd never lie about that sort of thing as either alignment. Silly silly.

On February 01 2014 03:35 marvellosity wrote:
Why would you ever wish incompetence upon me? That hurts.

On February 01 2014 03:36 WaveofShadow wrote:
Happy pre-birthday Austin!
Can your present be to win this game with me rather than on your own?