| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
No you are just so self-absorbed that instead of trying to shoot one of the many good vig targets in the game, you shoot the clearly town medic that was making good cases against you. Basically, if you shoot the same target as scum night one you are a failure of a vigilante. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
|
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
| ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
On December 13 2013 13:45 Plutarch wrote: What do you two think of LSB? once you reach the end of the thread you'll find out (my number one scumread after re-reading) | ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
as always these reads may or may not be fake until im actually going to die. | ||
|
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On December 13 2013 13:45 Plutarch wrote: What do you two think of LSB? Going to bed now. I'll reread him tomorrow but I don't think I've found him scummy at all so far though. I do like his scumreads (which I believe are purple and sidesprung) Ur thoughts on Vayne? | ||
|
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
On December 13 2013 13:53 JarJarDrinks wrote: Going to bed now. I'll reread him tomorrow but I don't think I've found him scummy at all so far though. I do like his scumreads (which I believe are purple and sidesprung) Ur thoughts on Vayne? not sure yet. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
Vote Count VAYNEAUTHORITY (2): JarJarDrinks, ArtanisXp XATALOS (1): Corazon ARTANISXP (1): Xatalos SIDESPRANG (1): LSB XIGXAG (1): Alakaslam NOT VOTING: raynpelikoneet, VayneAuthority, Coagulation, kushm4sta, Grackaroni, Plutarch, xigxag, sidesprang, purpletrator Currently VayneAuthority is set to be lynched. Let me know if I missed anyone! Deadline is in | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On December 13 2013 15:43 Coagulation wrote: I voted Corazon You voted Corazon yesterday | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
corazon artanis that other scummy guy | ||
|
sidesprang
Norway1033 Posts
What I've noted so far is, that I noticed people wanted to try to find mafia from looking at the voting pattern. Which I think is a valid way of doing things. One thing that caught my mind was. There was deffo some suspicious votes happening, I think we all agree on that. But for one of those suspicious votes to actually be a mafia, wont VA have to be mafia. Like I mean no mafia member should vote like that unless they try to save his teammate. So my thought is VA = Mafia -> susp votes = mafia VA = Town-> susp votes = town Of course there is also the possibility that its just bad play in general. But I think the link is worth to take note of. Only read purps filter for today, but I find that one very scummy in general. He is not really doing much. He said he had a town read on cora, then 2 hours after he proceeds to vote on him. I think it had something to do with the notes. I'll look more into why he did that flip later. And he is also defending VA a lot. All that together with the very weak reason for voting spag makes him very scummy in my eyes. I wont cast any votes untill I get to read the rest, but I need some sleep first. | ||
|
sidesprang
Norway1033 Posts
| ||
|
Plutarch
Greece515 Posts
On December 10 2013 07:36 LSB wrote: In my opinion natural scum play is to stay low, especially on day 1, the town tends to self destruct anyways day 1. This whole entire "starting shit" strat is actually pretty good, even though it is counterintuitive to the idea of trying to not draw attention. Thus I assumed this strat is not very obvious, especially since I personally never considered it. The second interesting thing in his filter is the way he states in his first case how we need to worry about scum bandwagoning onto lynches. On December 10 2013 13:35 LSB wrote: What is important to keep an eye out are the bandwagoners. The logic behind this is that very few townies would be willing to push a bad lynch, but a mafia would be willing to push many lynches on greenies regarless of the contents of the lynches. I am seriously concerned about his willingness to support lynches without contributing much personal insights. Which is kind of funny considering his terrible voting history. On December 10 2013 06:43 LSB wrote: ##Vote: purpletrator Scum are mafia pretending to be someone else. Smurfs are players pretending to be someone else. Smurfs = Mafia. Flawless mafia. Lynch all Smurfs On December 10 2013 09:00 LSB wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote: kushm4sta On December 11 2013 00:32 LSB wrote: I'm glad to see someone feels that Purpletrator is being overly defensive Rather than being nonsensical I saw it as being paranoid and believing there was a serious case on him and a need to defend himself. He handled that far too poorly, I chalked it up as bad play at the time, but this paranoia does bother me. ##unvote ##Vote Purpletrator On December 11 2013 12:04 LSB wrote: LETS GET THIS WAGON GOING GAIS ##unvote ##Vote: Sidesprang On December 12 2013 05:40 LSB wrote: Spaghetticus filter is just one giant mess of him trying to stir up activity, to me he is trying to show himself as being more active than he actually is. Unfortunately between Spag and VA I am not confident about someone being scum, but Spag's filter suggests to me that he is more likely than not mafia ##Unvote ##Vote: Spaghetticus On December 13 2013 06:21 LSB wrote: Oh I see Well that solves the Corazon issue. ##Vote: Sidesprang Calls out bad bandwagon votes for being scummy, proceeds to make bandwagon votes all game. | ||
| ||
|
|
|
EPT
