|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 15 2013 13:09 Plutarch wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2013 13:04 VayneAuthority wrote: alakaslam is now the smartest person in the thread, my how times change What did you intend to achieve by claiming scum. Because that is what you did 100 percent. Explain to me the townie motivation for that post? doesn't matter; he is scum, he claimed it. I have no dieing wish, no autoeulogy, no final will other than that VA be lynched tomorrow.
that is all that matters.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Vayne claimed scum. I don't know why there's anyone who doesn't want to lynch him. The reason he claimed scum is he thinks he can troll out of it, or maybe that it's such an audacious move that people will think scum could never do that, but stop thinking about that. stop thinking about his motives, stop thinking about anything other than this:
VA claimed scum.
not like some kind of rhetorical argument where I'm like "wow Player A, that argument is so bad you figuratively claimed scum" no not like that, VA actually claimed scum, he LITERALLY tried to coordinate his nk with the sk in the thread.
On December 15 2013 11:58 VayneAuthority wrote: SK we will shoot blazinghand so don't shoot him aight, don't wanna overlap
see that?
remember that: remember that if you somehow don't lynch VA tomorrow, when you wonder where you went wrong, how you let scum win-- remember that he claimed scum, and you did nothing
lynch VA. there is no excuse not to.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
scumclaim is scumclaim, nice try scumbuddy of scum
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
final will: lynch via
no excuses. nothing else matter
don't like x x either bit he's miner
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
lynch via lynh va lynch via lynch va lynch va
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 16 2013 06:12 Plutarch wrote: Another medic save or the sk was shot? my guess is scum probably thought no more medics. vayne tried to coord with SK.kush saved me.
doesn't matter though we lunch vayne ez
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 16 2013 06:34 sidesprang wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2013 06:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: I was kinda hoping you would contribute something? You did the vote stuff on N1 start and gave some weak ass analysis and dropped off the earth for the rest of the phase just to appear on D3 start. Do you have anything constructive to say? If you expect long analysis and stuff from me then you will prolly be dissapointed. I'm not that guy, and i'm not on that level either. I tell what I see, my two biggest scumreads was Vayne and Purple, purple is now confirmed scum and Vayne is looking really bad aswell. About the voting thing I made it because I thought there might be something interesting there. But I was kinda dissapointed when I was done cause I did not really find much, would you rather I keep it secret cause I did not find anything. I still think it's better to share, mb some other guys can find something (or just save time trying to count the votes themselves). The only real point apart from the obvious stuff (you / plut and mb artanis coming out more town) is that I think alakaslam is more likely to be town aswell. I dont think a mafia would have voted that way, he had his vote on xigxag which he could have easily kept there or even pushed for LSB which might had stopped the purp train from even starting.
sorry on phone plz link to where purp is conf scum ty
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 16 2013 06:41 sidesprang wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2013 06:39 Blazinghand wrote:On December 16 2013 06:34 sidesprang wrote:On December 16 2013 06:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: I was kinda hoping you would contribute something? You did the vote stuff on N1 start and gave some weak ass analysis and dropped off the earth for the rest of the phase just to appear on D3 start. Do you have anything constructive to say? If you expect long analysis and stuff from me then you will prolly be dissapointed. I'm not that guy, and i'm not on that level either. I tell what I see, my two biggest scumreads was Vayne and Purple, purple is now confirmed scum and Vayne is looking really bad aswell. About the voting thing I made it because I thought there might be something interesting there. But I was kinda dissapointed when I was done cause I did not really find much, would you rather I keep it secret cause I did not find anything. I still think it's better to share, mb some other guys can find something (or just save time trying to count the votes themselves). The only real point apart from the obvious stuff (you / plut and mb artanis coming out more town) is that I think alakaslam is more likely to be town aswell. I dont think a mafia would have voted that way, he had his vote on xigxag which he could have easily kept there or even pushed for LSB which might had stopped the purp train from even starting. sorry on phone plz link to where purp is conf scum ty He died and he flipped as mafia :O
no hes still alive i just reply to him
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
oh sorry meant plutarch
y not lynch va he is scum
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
lol vayne is scum, why are you guys even talking with him
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Xigxag is obviously going to come back and vote to avoid being modkilled, we get rid of him now rather than at lylo. He's done it before, he'll do it again. Don't rely on the mods, do your own work. yada yada
##vote: xigxag
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter what xigxag's freaking "motivations" are or whether this is "alignment indicative", you mealy-mouthed monopede mangler, what matters is that his actions cannot stand, cannot be accepted, and CANNOT be analyzed. He is a lurker, the lurkest of lurkers, unreadable, uncaseable, only lynchable by policy. If he's scum what the heck do you want me to say? "oh I didn't like his most recent vote" well freaking fiddlesticks man his most recent vote was that he was voting, AND I QUOTE, I QUOTE,
On December 14 2013 21:37 xigxag wrote: I am avoiding a possible mod kill with this vote. Actual analysis will follow when I return from work.
now wait bh you say, how was his analysis?
On December 14 2013 21:39 xigxag wrote: xatalos would be my read of xat by the way. I see some votes on him. He seemed like town or sk, not scum from earlier readong. Just my 2c.
yes, that was his analysis 2 minutes later, and since then he has not posted. At all. The fact that any of you find his activity even remotely acceptable is unbe-flipping-lievable.
unless someone LITERALLY claims scum, i'm not voting anyone else.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 17 2013 03:14 Xatalos wrote: Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious?
LSB has posted much more than xigxag in the past day, though his activity is also low. I don't see how this is even remotely relevant though, since nothing is more suspicious than what XigXag is doing. You're either xcum and trying to protect your xcumbuddy or you're being blinded by the availability heuristic. The fact that LSB's post seem more suspicious is not relevant given that xigxag has actually not been posting. You can't say his posts are more suspicious than xigxag's have been, you just remember him posting more and therefore he sticks out in your mind. Get your HEAD IN THE GAME.
If LSB seems scummy because he's at least making a trivial effort to play the game, THAT MEANS HE CAN BE ANALYZED. That means he is NOT our lynch for today. You're basically arguing that we should lynch LSB because he's a worse lynch. Come on man. COME ON.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
LIKE REALLY MAN THINK ABOUT IT. for all we know xigxag's posts would be way scummier than LSB's, but WE DONT KNOW. WE DONT BECAUSE HES NOT POSTING.
nobody has a townread on xigxag. You want to know why? the motherflipper has been lurking. We can't rely on a cop in a game with 2 docs and a vigi. We can't rely on anything but the lynch, our best and first tool for destroying scum. You want xig around in LYLO? cuase that's what's gonna happen unless we lynch him before then. Scum sure as dicks aint gonna shoot him. SK won't shoot him since he doesn't know whether he's shooting scum or town when he shoots xig.
Xigxag will make it to lylo unless we stop him. The ONLY argument against lynching him that makes sense is "I think he'll get modkilled" but even then we can't rely on it, he is playing to avoid getting modkilled. Everyone's like "well I don't have a scumread on him" but shitake mushrooms, man, that ain't gonna change. What you think he's gonna somehow do something that makes him a townread for you? If so I got a bridge to sell you, real cheap, I promise.
Lynch Xigxag. it's the only move. Everyone talks about how we should lynch out the lurkers to avoid BS like this but nobody has the cojones to do it.
come on guys. have cojones. make the right play for once.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 17 2013 03:40 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2013 03:34 Blazinghand wrote:On December 17 2013 03:14 Xatalos wrote: Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious? LSB has posted much more than xigxag in the past day, though his activity is also low. I don't see how this is even remotely relevant though, since nothing is more suspicious than what XigXag is doing. You're either xcum and trying to protect your xcumbuddy or you're being blinded by the availability heuristic. The fact that LSB's post seem more suspicious is not relevant given that xigxag has actually not been posting. You can't say his posts are more suspicious than xigxag's have been, you just remember him posting more and therefore he sticks out in your mind. Get your HEAD IN THE GAME. If LSB seems scummy because he's at least making a trivial effort to play the game, THAT MEANS HE CAN BE ANALYZED. That means he is NOT our lynch for today. You're basically arguing that we should lynch LSB because he's a worse lynch. Come on man. COME ON. I'd think that barely posting above the lurker definition, and being scummy in those few posts, is more scummy than not posting at all.......
Okay, great idea, let's not lynch xigxag i'm sure that will just work itself out.... oh wait no the opposite of that
|
|
|
|