EPTBut MZ should NOT be a lynch candidate today.
PYP: League of Legends Mafia - Page 226
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
But MZ should NOT be a lynch candidate today. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On December 07 2013 10:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: supersoft i am not going to look into MZ because there are better lynches like austin. I don't even know what the case on MZ is (and no, geript's "case" is not a case). Case on Meapak_Ziphh 1. Scummy thing: (bolded) On December 07 2013 09:06 supersoft wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=436086&user=Meapak_Ziphh¤tpage=2 First thing I notice is this whole VE obsession. Even though I mostly agree on the stuff you write, it's too much. I mean, you call VE town and then you follow that up with way too much analysis on this townie. From what I remember, VE was never in real trouble. Your contributione was unnecessary. Unnecessary analysis reeks of scum. 2. Scummy thing: On December 07 2013 09:22 supersoft wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=436086&user=Meapak_Ziphh¤tpage=3 start of the LSB-phase i like the first 2 posts, the third one is a little bit over the top. Maybe because I think it's going in the wrong direction, because it's not LSB who is the problem, it's the people that claim needlessly.... http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=436086&user=Meapak_Ziphh¤tpage=4 (+) page 5++ starts the most recent discussion and stuff... All in all. This VE obsession and that dialogue with LSB. mh! well. However: On December 07 2013 09:53 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Guys I'm about to go out to eat, I want to resolve this now, I'm starting to get pissed off again. I have the same amount of votes as austin who like half the thread has called scum and the people voting me can't even be bothered to actually figuring out why they're voting me. I'm absolutely done hearing about the VE shit. That was D0, if you weren't paying attention then that's your own fault. There is literally no case on me, I've sat here and waited for one so I could defend myself but one never appeared. I wasn't around yesterday, sue me, but I still think I deserve to actually understand why people are voting me. I'll try and be on my phone. I can understand this post. It's somehow genuine ... | ||
|
justanothertownie
16324 Posts
On December 07 2013 09:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: He has really bad reads which are not in fact reads. All he talks about is MZ/Rean and lately Roffles and everything he says about them is "this guy is scum if this guy is not" type of things. I don't think this is true. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On December 07 2013 10:12 jaybrundage wrote: KK lets talk on consolidating on Roffles or austin. If your town you should get off the MZ wagon. Letting there be three wagons lets scum manipulate it much easier. We should narrow this down between 2 people. I'm still on the fence regarding the two. But MZ should NOT be a lynch candidate today. Saying it does not make it so. Make a point that we can read/discuss. Otherwise I'm going with the reasons I've posted. As a matter of fact, the fact that MZ didn't know why I was voting him shows me he isn't/hasn't read the thread. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
We should just take care of Roffles via KP. He is lurking hardcore and he is playing anti town as shit. His death gives us nothing to go off of. I wouldn't be surprised if austin and Roffles are both on scum team. And they send roffles out to be a distraction to both get heat off austin and if we lynch austin its unlikely we will lynch roffles because the stereotype is that hes just a anti town trolling townie instead of a scum making plays. ##Unvote ##VOTE AUSTINMCC | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
I want 2 candidates. Austin and MZ. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On December 07 2013 10:15 geript wrote: Saying it does not make it so. Make a point that we can read/discuss. Otherwise I'm going with the reasons I've posted. As a matter of fact, the fact that MZ didn't know why I was voting him shows me he isn't/hasn't read the thread. Geript do you have anything to add to the case supersoft posted on MZ. Before you say I haven't been reading the thread I stated that I was 20 pages behind. Do you agree with the SS summary or do you have a post or something you would like me to read. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
Also I want everyon who votes Austin to at least quote a post or anything that contains a reason that convinced him. It's not acceptable that you just come in here and be like: "uh so hard to read. need to sleep voting austin/MZ/Roffels - yolo" | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
However now that I think VE can be scum. It changed my read a bit. Gonna look over MZ more. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16324 Posts
On December 07 2013 10:25 supersoft wrote: And I want you lazy bummers to comment on my MZ shit! ASAP. Also I want everyon who votes Austin to at least quote a post or anything that contains a reason that convinced him. It's not acceptable that you just come in here and be like: "uh so hard to read. need to sleep voting austin/MZ/Roffels - yolo" Ok, here is your comment: I agree that his VE read was extremely overblown. I agree that his attack on LSB was weird (not that he attacked him but how) as I already pointed out when it happened. If I have to choose between lynching austin and MZ I will vote MZ. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On December 07 2013 10:25 supersoft wrote: And I want you lazy bummers to comment on my MZ shit! ASAP. Also I want everyon who votes Austin to at least quote a post or anything that contains a reason that convinced him. It's not acceptable that you just come in here and be like: "uh so hard to read. need to sleep voting austin/MZ/Roffels - yolo" There is no case on MZ and you want people on austin to explain their votes? wtf man? austin is useless and only makes connection cases that are bullshit. are you scum ss? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16324 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On December 07 2013 10:30 raynpelikoneet wrote: There is no case on MZ and you want people on austin to explain their votes? wtf man? austin is useless and only makes connection cases that are bullshit. are you scum ss? Get your brain examined. I am fucking torn between Austin and MZ. But right now i am more concerned that this thread doesn't move if anyone of these people gets killed and flips town. There is nothing wrong about demanding reasoning for votes! This is fucking essential. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
What i don't understand that there are no explanations for MZ votes yet only thing you are pushing for is reasoning for austin votes. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On December 07 2013 10:30 raynpelikoneet wrote: There is no case on MZ and you want people on austin to explain their votes? wtf man? austin is useless and only makes connection cases that are bullshit. are you scum ss? And why aren't you pushing Austinmcc more if you think he's scum and MZ is town? You're just standing at the side like: "hey guys, just saying. Austin is scum, don't listen to me though!" that's at least my impression! If you hadn't had 1234123523452345 filterpages i'd already called you scum for that behaviour. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On December 07 2013 10:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: That's not my point ss and i understand. What i don't understand that there are no explanations for MZ votes yet only thing you are pushing for is reasoning for austin votes. Okay now I get it. @all: Obviously, I demand an explanation for every MZ vote, too! | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On December 07 2013 10:38 supersoft wrote: Okay now I get it. @all: Obviously, I demand an explanation for every MZ vote, too! I btw. asked Mig twice or more often to offer his explanation! These MZ voters just disappeared. This makes me worry quite a bit! | ||
|
justanothertownie
16324 Posts
| ||
| ||
