|
On November 30 2013 22:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Oats if you suggest there is some tell like "marv says dude over dear when he is scum" you are wrong, because there is not. It's about what he is pushing and why. I feel confident in my ability in reading marv. Last game he was scum i literally shouted a lynch on him over a dude who was confirmed scum to me so..
Am i confident in saying he is scum atm? No, but i don't get any townvibes from him either. If you are suggesting my reads are strong at this point (like you are implying) then idk what to tell you, but the correct way is definitely not to shut down all discussion regarding certain people just because you feel like i am not allowed to have a scumread on someone for some shitty reason.
what game was that?
So Marv and Sandro are null? is that what you are saying?
|
On November 30 2013 23:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Desert mini mafia.
No i think they are scummy until they start doi8ng osmething that actually matters. There has been a ton of discussion about people's alignments and they have not taken any part in it.
A ton meaning like less than the setup discussion?
How do you expect to catch scum in this first phase if you think like this???
|
Im pretty sure name means like Oats/SS. Lol or else its practically unusable
|
On December 01 2013 02:11 supersoft wrote:yes i know. but this banning discussion is terribly boring... i wanted to join this game day2... that's why i didnt replace in immediately. Another aspect. Oats is so calm and somehow reasonable. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=436086&user=Oatsmasterhe's actually even defending me a little (even though he didnt really read my posts). Your thoughts?
Lol so attacking rayn = defending you?
What do you think about rayn and Sandro?
|
|
|
Gonna pick my favourite champ, no its not teemo.
I dont think we should have a plan because then scum can just fuck everything up and mass confusion ensues.
|
Lol all this nonsense about marv.
Marv, whos scum?
|
|
|
On December 01 2013 22:55 Kurumi wrote:
Mafia really does not want us to know their champion names.
You are mafia and have access to their QT?
|
On December 01 2013 22:13 supersoft wrote:this looks like a cheap countermove to this:
lol what?
|
On December 01 2013 23:02 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On December 01 2013 22:57 Oatsmaster wrote:On December 01 2013 22:13 supersoft wrote:On December 01 2013 21:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
SS pretty scummy this looks like a cheap countermove to this: On December 01 2013 02:11 supersoft wrote:yes i know. but this banning discussion is terribly boring... i wanted to join this game day2... that's why i didnt replace in immediately. Another aspect. Oats is so calm and somehow reasonable. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=436086&user=Oatsmasterhe's actually even defending me a little (even though he didnt really read my posts). Your thoughts? lol what? seriously? we're already at the point where you just "lol what?" my posts? You said I am scummy. You didn't give any reasoning. I called you out before for soft-defending me randomly without actually reading my stuffthen one day later you randomly appear and call me scum. I point out, that this looks like a cheap countermove and you answer "lol what?" I think you're just posting without reading anything in detail. That's extremely scummy man. I don't know I won't talk about ongoing games here.
by "lol what" I mean how in the world are you calling me scum for something that didnt even happen.
|
This doesnt make any sense Mocsta
However he also seems to have read the roles to some extent - at least enough to participate in discussion here and there. Hence, I would have expect a town Marv to fall under path (A) regardless of work ethic.
Why would marv intentionally rock the boat as town? Do you not think Yorick is a good ban?
|
On December 01 2013 23:22 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On December 01 2013 23:21 Oatsmaster wrote:This doesnt make any sense Mocsta However he also seems to have read the roles to some extent - at least enough to participate in discussion here and there. Hence, I would have expect a town Marv to fall under path (A) regardless of work ethic.
Why would marv intentionally rock the boat as town? Do you not think Yorick is a good ban? Why would I not? This post is dumb.
The point of the post is to say that mocsta is wrong about the thing I quoted.
what is with this nitpicking?
|
By wrong I mean, its not alignment indicative.
Anyway he clarified his point meaning you did nothing when you entered instead of advancing discussion.
|
On December 01 2013 23:26 marvellosity wrote:
And the reason I pointed it out is that I don't like being defended for bad reasons such as "why would town marv rock the boat"
yeah phrased badly there.
|
On December 02 2013 00:27 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2013 00:25 Kurumi wrote:
I'm wondering why the hell would Oats go 1,1 after rayn claimed to get those.
Why you did not want Rayn first Oats? I'd quite like an answer to this too :>
I thought he was trying to trick scum
|
On December 02 2013 00:35 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2013 00:32 Oatsmaster wrote:On December 02 2013 00:27 marvellosity wrote:On December 02 2013 00:25 Kurumi wrote:
I'm wondering why the hell would Oats go 1,1 after rayn claimed to get those.
Why you did not want Rayn first Oats? I'd quite like an answer to this too :> I thought he was trying to trick scum did it work?
yup.
|
So rayn;'s plan, claim 1/1, then dont pick 1/1 and YOU KNOW that town is gonna pick 1/1 but scum wants roles more than town so they aint gonna pick 1/1
|
On December 02 2013 01:59 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2013 01:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
So rayn;'s plan, claim 1/1, then dont pick 1/1 and YOU KNOW that town is gonna pick 1/1 but scum wants roles more than town so they aint gonna pick 1/1 Noone ever is going to get the same number as someone claimed unless they want to drown them somewhere deep down in the draft list.
You really think that?
|
On December 02 2013 02:18 gtrsrs wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2013 01:12 VisceraEyes wrote:
So much LoL. So much. All of my LoLs. is there any way we can cut these posts out? not really adding much to the game. makes me lose focus when trying to catch up. did i read the page where X lol'd at Y? did i read the page where Y lol'd back at X? it's a huge turnoff and i don't want to say it looks scummy but it makes me want to vote for people spamming this shit just so we don't have to read it all game
Oh man, you are in for a treat.
Instead of writing a stupid post about stupid posts, why dont you play the game?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
