PYP: League of Legends Mafia - Page 2

On November 30 2013 22:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Oats if you suggest there is some tell like "marv says dude over dear when he is scum" you are wrong, because there is not. It's about what he is pushing and why. I feel confident in my ability in reading marv. Last game he was scum i literally shouted a lynch on him over a dude who was confirmed scum to me so..

Am i confident in saying he is scum atm? No, but i don't get any townvibes from him either. If you are suggesting my reads are strong at this point (like you are implying) then idk what to tell you, but the correct way is definitely not to shut down all discussion regarding certain people just because you feel like i am not allowed to have a scumread on someone for some shitty reason.

On November 30 2013 23:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Desert mini mafia.
No i think they are scummy until they start doi8ng osmething that actually matters. There has been a ton of discussion about people's alignments and they have not taken any part in it.

On December 01 2013 02:11 supersoft wrote:
yes i know. but this banning discussion is terribly boring... i wanted to join this game day2... that's why i didnt replace in immediately.
Another aspect. Oats is so calm and somehow reasonable.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=436086&user=Oatsmaster

he's actually even defending me a little (even though he didnt really read my posts).

Your thoughts?

On December 01 2013 22:55 Kurumi wrote:
Mafia really does not want us to know their champion names.

On December 01 2013 22:13 supersoft wrote:


this looks like a cheap countermove to this:

On December 01 2013 23:02 supersoft wrote:


seriously? we're already at the point where you just "lol what?" my posts? You said I am scummy. You didn't give any reasoning.
I called you out before for soft-defending me randomly without actually reading my stuff
then one day later you randomly appear and call me scum.

I point out, that this looks like a cheap countermove and you answer "lol what?"

I think you're just posting without reading anything in detail. That's extremely scummy man. I don't know
I won't talk about ongoing games here.

However he also seems to have read the roles to some extent - at least enough to participate in discussion here and there. Hence, I would have expect a town Marv to fall under path (A) regardless of work ethic.

On December 01 2013 23:22 marvellosity wrote:

Why would I not? This post is dumb.

On December 01 2013 23:26 marvellosity wrote:
And the reason I pointed it out is that I don't like being defended for bad reasons such as "why would town marv rock the boat"

On December 02 2013 00:27 marvellosity wrote:

I'd quite like an answer to this too :>

On December 02 2013 00:35 jcarlsoniv wrote:


did it work?

On December 02 2013 01:59 Kurumi wrote:

Noone ever is going to get the same number as someone claimed unless they want to drown them somewhere deep down in the draft list.

On December 02 2013 02:18 gtrsrs wrote:




is there any way we can cut these posts out? not really adding much to the game. makes me lose focus when trying to catch up. did i read the page where X lol'd at Y? did i read the page where Y lol'd back at X? it's a huge turnoff and i don't want to say it looks scummy but it makes me want to vote for people spamming this shit just so we don't have to read it all game