|
On December 04 2013 11:49 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2013 11:41 VisceraEyes wrote:
Austin that statement was so weird...why would you consider lynching someone if you agree with his targets? Who cares if they flip town, if you agree with his targets why would them flipping town change your read on Roffles? Nono. He was on my list of people to look into as I was catching up. When I filtered him, his filter looks not great to me except that the people he's calling mafia are people I like other people to call mafia. My agreement is ... important to me for today, but really it's that if they flip red, he's calling out mafioso on D1, unlikely to be mafia. If they flip town, whether I liked his reads or no, the only thing that I really liked in his filter were reads that turned out to be on townies. I can be wrong. Sometimes. Everyone can be wrong. But if they flip green/blue then all we had in common was that we would have made similar mislynches, and that feels....less good than both making similar scum lynches.
Except what you said was that you wouldn't lynch him unless they started flipping green. I get "less good" but that's a farcry from "I will lynch because"
|
On December 04 2013 11:51 ticklishmusic wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2013 11:23 bumatlarge wrote:
Kassadin is a selective Roleblocker, aside from Viktor, it's the strongest role for both sides. If it is in town's hands and he doesn't claim, it's good for town obviously, but we shouldn't have ignored BC and my sentiments that certain roles need to be known and on whom.
If scum has kassadin, thats basically a dead blue power for town 100% of the time. If town has kassadin and I rolecheck that person, I'm going to claim or him and try to lynch him in a vacuum. Wait what role are you claiming again?
He claimed to try for Lux.
|
On December 04 2013 11:53 Roffles wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2013 11:49 VisceraEyes wrote:
If the shots registered I'd have a problem. I just think it's funny honestly. Maybe tomorrow people will stop screwing around. Ok I promise that was the last time. The initial vote on Bum was initially for his D0 play and his willingness to propose an organized plan and having nothing to do with it afterwards. The first unvote was because I wanted to kill Jay as well because his play has reeked of scum, even after my initial reads on him. The revote onto Bum was cause his poem was too elegant for my liking. Why spend time to devise something like that when he has other pressing issues to tend to if he really wants to stay alive. Anything after that was to piss you off.
What were you hoping to achieve by pissing me off?
|
Or should I just look at the name? 
|
On December 04 2013 11:54 Roffles wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2013 11:54 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 04 2013 11:53 Roffles wrote:On December 04 2013 11:49 VisceraEyes wrote:
If the shots registered I'd have a problem. I just think it's funny honestly. Maybe tomorrow people will stop screwing around. Ok I promise that was the last time. The initial vote on Bum was initially for his D0 play and his willingness to propose an organized plan and having nothing to do with it afterwards. The first unvote was because I wanted to kill Jay as well because his play has reeked of scum, even after my initial reads on him. The revote onto Bum was cause his poem was too elegant for my liking. Why spend time to devise something like that when he has other pressing issues to tend to if he really wants to stay alive. Anything after that was to piss you off. What were you hoping to achieve by pissing me off? Entertainment for me.
You know what I hear is totally self-entertaining? Explaining one's thought-progressions and reads! A LAUGH "RIOT"!
|
EVERYONE SEE WHAT I DID THERE AT THE END?!
|
On December 04 2013 11:58 Mocsta wrote:
Geript
My point was that he was throwing his vote away.
Granted consolidation isnt required at this point its still more trollish than I would expect.
I take it that you disagree?
I hardly play with those guys and I've heard of Roffles. Absolutely not out of character if town imo.
|
On December 04 2013 12:03 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2013 12:01 geript wrote:On December 04 2013 11:58 Mocsta wrote:
Geript
My point was that he was throwing his vote away.
Granted consolidation isnt required at this point its still more trollish than I would expect.
I take it that you disagree? I don't think that when a lynch is this far ahead with time to kill and ODD type person wouldn't mind fucking with people just to fuck with people. With 4 people on LSB and 4 on jay, very low odds that his vote makes any difference. I don't read into it as more than trollish and slightly town leaning as scum get random attention for that when it's not like he's not already going to be under fire as being a lurker. Considering I have caught you before for doing stealth votes. And we all know that you would unvote and vote the accuser I dont see what the problem is. Why cant we ask Roffles to take accountability? Even if he was town realising consolidation is not required; how do we know hes not going to do this again next cycle. Premature cockblock from you, I thinks.
gtsrs
|
|
|
On December 04 2013 12:19 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2013 12:15 Mocsta wrote:
sigh...
Geript... This is why we need accountability. Theres not really much I can say about Roffles good or bad because its in that stupid fucking in between.
Whered Jay go? Honestly I'm way more concerned with Coagulation than Roffles.
+1
|
Yeah he replaced another unreadable troll. Lucky us.
|
On average he posts around 10000% more on OMGUS games than TL games. He doesn't care about looking dumb over there, where he does here...I think is what it boils down to.
|
On December 04 2013 12:25 Oatsmaster wrote:
Coag doesnt even do shit in any game, VE how is that alignment indicative?
It's not, that's why I called him an unreadable troll.
|
On December 04 2013 12:29 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2013 12:19 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 04 2013 12:19 geript wrote:On December 04 2013 12:15 Mocsta wrote:
sigh...
Geript... This is why we need accountability. Theres not really much I can say about Roffles good or bad because its in that stupid fucking in between.
Whered Jay go? Honestly I'm way more concerned with Coagulation than Roffles. +1 So what? Jay is super concerned about his appearence.
So? Do you think he's scum?
|
On December 04 2013 12:32 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2013 12:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 04 2013 12:29 Oatsmaster wrote:On December 04 2013 12:19 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 04 2013 12:19 geript wrote:On December 04 2013 12:15 Mocsta wrote:
sigh...
Geript... This is why we need accountability. Theres not really much I can say about Roffles good or bad because its in that stupid fucking in between.
Whered Jay go? Honestly I'm way more concerned with Coagulation than Roffles. +1 So what? Jay is super concerned about his appearence. So? Do you think he's scum? yup
So I guess you don't remember back when you made this same argument for why Jay was confirmed scum in Nomination, huh?
|
Like, I'm not saying I disagree with you Oats - I just want you to think about the game critically.
|
On December 04 2013 12:39 Oatsmaster wrote:
I literally do not remember.
But, jay knows that he is "best mislynch NA".
Riiiight...and he's all about shouting it from the rooftops even as town. So it's going to take more than "Oh he's concerned about how he looks" to determine whether he's town or scum.
|
It will take literally no effort from me to get you lynched tomorrow Jay. Whether you fear geript because you don't know him or you fear me because you do, be certain that if you don't shape up, you WILL die tomorrow.
|
On December 04 2013 13:05 Coagulation wrote:
looks like town shit the bed
What did you expect without illuminating posts like this one?
|
It's night - do your thing. But I issue you the same warning I issue the rest of the lurkers. My second ability is my ult. I'm using it on lurkers this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
