TL Mafia LXIII: Time to Die
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 07 2013 12:54 Spaghetticus wrote: /in Hey bud ! Long time ! | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 08 2013 18:04 OOHCHILD wrote: i'm not a smurf just too lazy to log into my other account atm an di dont know the password exactly... /in kushm4sta LOl. Kush smurfs in non-newbies now? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 09 2013 05:09 yamato77 wrote: WoS, if I told you I was playing, would you rejoin? Was about to say /out as per: On November 09 2013 00:16 WaveofShadow wrote: i don't feel like dealing with irrational rage from you, and don't want to be involved in or create drama. If it won't happen, then I'll play. If it will, then I won't. Then i saw: On November 09 2013 06:20 marvellosity wrote: but you're not playing. Crisis diverted... *phew* | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 09 2013 07:39 marvellosity wrote: yes I do. edit: as someone mentioned it to me, that's not me saying that you can't. merely that you currently aren't I request a warning for Marvellosity for editing It is strictly against the rules e: On November 04 2013 06:58 marvellosity wrote: Editing: Editing is not allowed for any reason. Editing will result in a warning. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 12 2013 16:05 Onegu wrote: Im going to go for a 22 page filter as either alignmemt this game. See how it goes. Chortle | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 13 2013 09:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Interesting. and we are allowed to vote for ourselves Only if you use the mayor power to lynch yourself. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 14 2013 00:23 yamato77 wrote: If Moc is actually going to out because of me, put him in and take me out. I don't understand why it has to be this way, but whatever. Twas no / in the message, so wan't real. All good. however, if you joined without the intent to play, I would consider outting for realz, so lurking sux | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
If this starts in 48hrs, weekend & mayor elections do *not* go hand in hand ![]() | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 14 2013 12:08 VisceraEyes wrote: ![]() I just finished watching pacific rim so thats pretty funny to see (yes I Know its dbz) | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 14 2013 15:14 geript wrote: /in if there's room /replacement if there's not uuugghhhhh | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
I am announcing my intention to run for mayor. My campaign is a simple one. I will play my normal game: pressure/hunt scum openly in the thread. This person will then create the justification for my votes as mayor. Having said that, the goal of this game is not to lynch scum day1, but to lynch scum repeatedly. If an alternative <more popular> candidate will lynch my day1 target, then; I am willing to step down. Secondly, Once there are two or three front-runners for the mayor candidacy (perhaps in 24hrs time), we need to start discussing how to handle the pardoner situation. The typical solutions are: (1) Put the day1 lynch target as pardoner, so we remove the role from the game (2) If there is a very-strong town read on someone worth NK'n, make them the pardoner so they get the NK protection. As stated before, there is no point discussing this until the game develops more. Lastly, I present my best read: On November 15 2013 08:35 Mig wrote: For the people who are actually serious about running for mayor, what is going to be your day 1 lynch strategy? Vote for a lurker/go with your gut/town consensus/etc? On November 15 2013 08:38 StorrZerg wrote: Kill people who claim to be mafia claim rng for first lynch (prob not but need to keep people active) hunt scum lynch them with fire This conversation stuck out to me, enough to warrant a filter-dive. Its hard to give an opinion on Mig. What he said is pro-town, but its also the general spiel either alignment can spew. Will need to see more from Mig to form an opinion, however..... What I am more concerned about is Storrzerg. Specifically: On November 15 2013 08:38 StorrZerg wrote: claim rng for first lynch (prob not but need to keep people active) The justification presented for an rng lynch (" it keeps people active") is a' token gesture' at best, and 'devoid of any responsibility' at worst. --> I deem this to irrevocably satisfy scum motivations. Compare Storrzerg to Hogwarts. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=431052¤tpage=41#814 + Show Spoiler + On October 18 2013 05:51 StorrZerg wrote: i still think sn0 man is the best lynch atm Firstly his Stance on HufflePuff Such a think is uncalled for specifically since "Hufflepuff has produced the fewest Dark wizards of all the four Houses, if any." Thus my scum meeter was going nuts, now this isn't enough for a day 1 lynch but it is a very good start. After I called him out, he ignored me and made this very weird post. Again, this post just read really weird to me. So i checked his post history in previous games, and imo doesn't line up with his town. (usually he has more effort into his posts longer posts etc) He hadn't done anything till i called him out which his next post was He then pretty much goes dark after that. I will conclude my thoughts with he is none other than Slytherin scum. (btw this just so happens to have the house with the most notorious dark wizards in our world. He is very well a puppet to his parents) ps die scum In one of his first posts he plays balls-to-the-wall and presents a scum read with analysis. In this game we get: On November 15 2013 08:36 StorrZerg wrote: Generic spiel + potential scum slip.yamato77 will have to back me as well. he knows that I hunt for scum. also we should lynch people who claim mafia, 100% pro town tip The town mentality is " hunt scum" Hunting "for" scum, as a first post is.. interesting On November 15 2013 08:38 StorrZerg wrote: As explained prior, RNG for lynch does not share congruence with his attitude to "hunt scum"Kill people who claim to be mafia claim rng for first lynch (prob not but need to keep people active) hunt scum lynch them with fire But is congruent with "hunting for scum" On November 15 2013 08:43 StorrZerg wrote: More generic spiel. Since when is activity an indicator of alignment for the majority of players?How about an active guy? a guy that is looking out for the town because he is town! time to let some fresh blood lead the town straight and true im the clear and easy town read, no chance to be scum. On November 15 2013 09:50 StorrZerg wrote: First he wants to be mayor due to "hunting for scum"Joke ![]() ill be great whywon't peoplee let the scrub give it a go I'll try and make a bigger impact tomorrow, today is just not good for posting ![]() Secondly, his justification is "to give a scrub a shot". Thirdly, Playing the n00b card?? Storrzerg clearly has no motivation to scum hunt. I get that his posting was early Day1 -- perhaps there was nothing to "focus" on. However, each of his posts has exhibited a mindset not conducive to finding scum, let alone lynch scum. His platform is a RNG lynch hidden behind newbie undertones, and ultimately: where I stand currently with my mayor target is: Storrzerg | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 11:12 Oatsmaster wrote: hm mocsta is either scum for jumping on lynchbait or town jumping on lynchbait. So classic chainsaw defending oats is back in town. Gg too easy. Nice attempt to belittle my case. Storrzerg is an experienced player. Far from lynch bait. Want to have another go and explain why you disagree with my findings. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
O really..... Storrzerg could be town making a selfish play for mayor. I can dig that, been there done that. I actually acknowledged this in my post. However, what I identified after a filter dive is that aside from a game plan to campaign for mayor his choice of play is pro town. Every game I have played in, it has always been scum pushing rng... Myself included in that increasingly larger subset. Storrzerg positions himself as a reliable scum hunter, asserting that unknowns yamato and VE would vote for him. Then spins this around proposing RNG on the basis of forcing activity. Yeah... I don't buy this, and neither should anyone else. It's a cheap cop out and I can not imagine a town person would approach a mayor game in this fashion. So.. your town. Why is this such a bad accusation that you are willing to delurk to voice concern. Actually fuck that Grack. If you are so certain it is bad play I want him lynched... Who do YOU want lynched as of now. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 11:42 Oatsmaster wrote: So what I dont like about Mocsta's mayor post is that its very staged and rehearsed. Which obviously is scummy because town dont need to make up shit and make sure it sounds nice. The thing with Storrzerg, like the stuff he says is objectively scummy. Sure. Noob claiming and all that. But town do it too. On the other hand, he doesnt normally post so reservedly. So in conclusion, I am null on Storrzerg and null on Mocsta. Oats baby. Read my case again I gave one of stores first posts from Hogwarts. A similar sized game. He came out guns blazing. The analysis was wrong. But more importantly it was there, unlike this game. Oats, shy are you so prickly this game. Normally you are obnoxious, but tidY you feel venomous. Why so angry? P.s. I'm more referring to your interactions with V.E | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 11:54 Grackaroni wrote: I don't think that's true at all. Lots of townies push RNG normally including myself. You posted a long fluffy post with 3 weak points. Storrzerg played the noob card- It's not scummy for newbs to use the noob card. He added the word for between hunt scum - wat? He thinks it would be a good idea to suggest RNG to raise activity - How does that make him scum? Damn auto correct some of the above came out wrong. Ohh well. Storrzerg isn't a noob. Anyways. This is pointless. I have identified my grievances with storrzerg and am somewhat surprised that you and oats are trying to cockblock storrzerg from having to respond. I don't like this from either of you. My suggestion is to shut up and let storrzerg respond. You can reassess your reads from there. In the meantime. Grack. You dodged my question. Who do YOU want to lynch, cos all I'm hearing is who you don't. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
It's making it a lot Harder to read either player as there is now motive that exists outside this game to consider. Sharrant is a name that keeps popping out. Can someone walk me through what the problem is. Iirc he has made one post. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 12:27 VisceraEyes wrote: There are motives that exist outside the game to consider with every player of every game. I disliked how Sharrant just looked to appear active - he asked a couple of players questions that led nowhere and then disappeared. I like that people are talking about him because it means maybe he'll feel inclined to participate more fully if he's town and if he's scum, why it gets his name in the hat for lynch regardless of who's mayor in the end. Sharrant is notoriously difficult to read. He gets called scum in every game I have played with . For the same reasons each and every time. I.e. lurking, useless etc This doesn't make him town, but off one or two posts makes him completely useless to consider. He is a coin flip d1. I'm not stating to not pressure him. Go ahead. I think however as a prime scum read, that effort is better placed as an alternative read. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 12:25 Alakaslam wrote: Dang it Mocsta. Well anyway I think some are mistaking sharrant for Storrzerg or Softiforget, because woah I did not see that coming I don't comprehend the issue here. I'm on a phone. Are you going anywhere with this, or plan to keep make useless comments? Ifyi there's some meta discussion going on with you. I only read one newbie of yours in the past. You seem to be more reserved this game, I.e. less stupid spammy. No idea what that means. It's just a memory observation. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 12:36 Oatsmaster wrote: No, sharrant is not notoriously difficult to read. What are you smoking? Every game I played with him he has been mislynched. Even as a cop. I dunno what you have got up ya ass. But you need to remove it. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Definitely 3. Maybe 4. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 12:51 Oatsmaster wrote: Wgere did mocsta go. Also how the fuck is Hiro your top townread Austin.. I'm at work where tl is firewalled. Be grateful I'm posting. I'm actually under the pump today, but can't stop pausing every 15min to refresh. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Every game Matt suggests in town and then I build a case on him. Pattern is repeating. I suppose I would have preferred if he told me why his conclusion from a reread did. It align with mine. But then, that would be answering the heat for storrzerg. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 14:20 Holyflare wrote: What does scum matt look like then? To be honest. I dunno. I'm. Not confident reading him because I naturally find him scummy. Much like I'm not confident reading you after Hogwarts. In voice mafia, scum mattchew is more aggressive than town mattchew. I.e. he uses his knowledge advantage to become more useful It's hard to say whether that crosses over to this game or is actually relevant. Either way mattchew is a guy that yes needs to post more throughout the game but like sharrant. I think these types of players are coin flippy day1. Nothing wrong with pressure, but I wouldn't bank on a firm read either side. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 14:42 Holyflare wrote: agreed ??? So what was the point of the call out and meta follow up, if you agree it doesn't support your conclusion. To be frank. I find this suspicious regardless of Matt's alignment. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
That is not cool. I don't five a fuck what alignment u r. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 15:10 Grackaroni wrote: I don't have any strong scum reads. Maybe Mocsta is scum. Stop talking smack All I have seen from you are free town reads and zero accountability on scum reads. If you want to insinuate I'm scum, man up and build a case. Otherwise you are quickly rising to be my prime lynch candidate for mayor. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
[/QUOTE] So are you like still serious about this StorrZerg thing? You mentioned it earlier and you don't seem super perturbed that he's not being talked about still...a little subdued. Walk me through it - what makes you so sure Storr is mafia?[/QUOTE] What's there left to comment. Nobody supported it so... I'm waiting for him to retort. Will be able to flesh it out more from there. People don't agree now, but I caught zaragon in Hogwarts off his first three posts Patience ser viscera. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 15:37 Grackaroni wrote: I'm actually one of the few people not throwing out free town reads. Disagree. Everything you are doing is cockblocks. And then hide behind pandain as the source of your scum reads. You don't even comment if pandain is a strong town read for you to be able to share so strongly those reads. So yes, I disagree vehemently | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 15:48 Grackaroni wrote: I don't see how any of that equates to always giving out free town reads but w/e. Unless you are fixated on the descriptor "always" it should be quite clear. Why cockblocks someone in the first place. It's either be wise you are throwing caution or disagree. You chose not to throw caution, so clearly must disagree. Everytime you cockblocks, it's to try and crush someone's case/points on somebody. So clearly you disagree with the case. If you had a null read on those people you would let them defend themselves. Instead you are white knifhting for them. So either you are town with a town read on particulars Or scum that is too scared to push anyone. So yes. I disagree vehemently. You are giving out too many free town reads and further I find your posting forced. At least in Hogwarts your uselessness could be hidden behind a carefree attitude. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 15:49 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm just asking if you're There's other scum in the game, so need to continue on. suspicious after hearing what others have said - whether your read has been reversed or remained resolute. I see now that you aren't so eager to say one way or another. You need not worry about my patience. Tell me all you think and feel about HolyFlare and Grackaroni please. Also vote for me to be mayor, it takes but a moment and the town will be better for it. Actually. I stand by my read. I am more acknowledging I understand if others require more input before joining me. Theres other scum in the game, so Need to continue on. As for holyflare and Grack. My thoughts on Grack are in the previous post. As for holy, I'm not confident. I suppose null.He seems less pro town than Hogwarts which is a good thing. There he had a really strong day1 and was scum. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
"Don't you worry, don't you worry, child. See heaven's got a plan for you. Don't you worry, don't you worry now." Yeah! I usually listen to you Kush -- even stand up for you when everyone wants to lynch you and I have a town read on ya. Thanks for considering me on your list anways ![]() | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 18:34 OOHCHILD wrote: Actually I take that back about wanting VE mayor. I looked through your filter ve and you didnt have anything to say about the case on rayne. Your only mention of it was to say super was "randomly attacking rayne". It's unacceptable for the potential mayor to completely ignore the best case in the game on the scummiest player in the game. What gives, ve? Austin or mocsta one of these dudes should definitely be mayor unless ve takes a townie looking stance on rayne. To pick your brain further. Rayn: there is nothing in your filter that shows why you like the lynch. The intensity above also feels like you have more than "+1" opinion. Can you please walk me through where you are coming from. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
(1) Is VE still dodgy, or has artanis taken his stead? + (2) What do you think of Hopeless1der? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434275&user=Hopeless1der I am aware that he was only present during the very early game where trolling is common; however, I find this quote unusual for town to make. On November 15 2013 08:26 Hopeless1der wrote: VE you got some credentials? How many successful mayor campaigns have you run? Maybe this is written very dry and the joke is going over my head; but I am interpreting this as giving contemplation to voting VE. BTW, which occurs here: On November 15 2013 08:55 Hopeless1der wrote: *must...not...feeed....troll* ##Vote: VisceraEyes My issue is that, I don't think a townie would given any sort of consideration to that criteria for considering a mayor. Fact is, town want in a mayor someone they think is a good player + standing out as town + has identified why their lynch choice is a solid candidate. You're a deep analyser of motivation; do you agree that the above is not evident in the mindset of Hopelss1der? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 22:52 raynpelikoneet wrote: Because it's really bad scumplay and Lonemeow as scum mason would have gone into scumchat and asked what to do with the mason instead of picking someone, especially yamato, from the playerlist. I don't think masoning yamato is *that* big a deal. He said early game he might not be able to devote full attention to this game. Having said that: LoneMeows reasoning detailed above, I suppose is townie by virtue of: claims that are so far-fetched/stupid are usually from town (i.e. scum try to have claims that are *too* perfect) In the end, I hope LoneMeow is active this game, I dont want to be put in that mislynch scenario again... *sigh* So, if worse comes to worse with lone, then considering yam is a fairly strong town read for me currently. I would probably defer to his judgement based on the mason logs. LoneMeow Is it safe to assume you have caught up on the thread? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 22:54 Oatsmaster wrote: HF campaign was null. I have already said my views on this. Agreed. Probably the worse thing about is, was that it was verbose. I would have thought that if Rayn had a genuine read on HF due to the campaign, he would have filter-dived him by now and generated something. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 22:57 Holyflare wrote: @Mocsta's post/rest of the game (I think artanis said the same things I said about rayn at some point too?) I'm sorry, what, the past few pages have been literal reitterations of what I've already stated, how is this anything new?? I get if you agree with what I've said Here for reference: + Show Spoiler + On November 15 2013 12:05 Holyflare wrote: fml I had to write this out twice because I had so many tabs open ~_~ @ rayn's post earlier: Here You claim that my case was in fact bad but then you agree with everything that I had specifically laid out within it, what gives? Did you just not read it? Clearly there were no good reads at that present time and for a mayor to be established reads must be thrown around, which is exactly what I was saying. Your choice of mayor is based entirely off if you agree with their reads? Why? You also debase the entirety of it because of the one line that said if "I failed to lynch my top scum readS". The plurality in reads assumes that one would live past day 1 and be able to use their double voting power as you cannot lynch multiple reads on day 1. There is also: You were scum partners with risen in heavyweight. You know he is crazy and will literally do anything or write anything to win. How can you be so quick to have a town read on him based off of a post? He has won world champs and also has the "best mafia play" award or whatever. To quite openly say you will not read him for the rest of day 1 is making me apprehensive to say the least. ____________________________________________________________________________ @rest of the town Also some other things that struck me as odd; Hopeless' start to the game: I've played one game with this guy and in that game (he was town) at the very start he was trying to contribute to current conversations and get things talking. This games start has been very lackluster from him. After asking VE about his past mayor games VE responds that he has been mayor once and he died night 1. By no means are they solid credentials in any terms. His contributions were just useless "won't vote for kush" posts. He then drops his mayor vote onto VE after hearing about his 1 game experience and leaves the thread. _____________________________________________________________________________________ I'm actually leaning a bit more suspiciously towards rayn right now; however I thought it was interesting to see these 2 posts just as I refreshed. + Show Spoiler + On November 15 2013 11:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: You get modkilled for not voting. :p What's wrongwith Oats this game? He's like a bit more dick than usually. On November 15 2013 11:55 Mocsta wrote: Oats baby. Read my case again I gave one of stores first posts from Hogwarts. A similar sized game. He came out guns blazing. The analysis was wrong. But more importantly it was there, unlike this game. Oats, shy are you so prickly this game. Normally you are obnoxious, but tidY you feel venomous. Why so angry? P.s. I'm more referring to your interactions with V.E Obviously no associative tells between unflipped players yada yada but I find it "psychologically intriguing" when people bring up similarities like that. Obviously if you are scum, the posts that stick out to you the most are your scum partners and so you can subconsciously repeat them etc. However, this is a lackluster point to say the least just something I'd thought I'd note. but to copy it and make it look like your own thoughts and then ask people for their ideas on it is kind of a pain in the arse, at least give credit where credit is due *scratches head* OK, I will accept that tone for now; but in all seriousness, I didn't even know you wrote that. I re-read the game and that was something that was sticking out for me. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Anything sticking out to you worth discussing? Do you have an opinion Storrzergs play? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:05 Koshi wrote: LoneMeow Explain to me why you Masoned Yamato. L2R On November 15 2013 22:46 LoneMeow wrote: Just to clear up why I masoned before posting: I read my role and it said to send the PM "at the beginning of cycle". It already being quite a few hours since the cycle started when I woke up, I just looked at the player list and picked someone before reading the thread. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Since you're asking dumb questions. Here is one for you. On November 15 2013 08:47 Koshi wrote: Can we lynch BH if he isn't totally awesome day 1? Like. I never get to see BH being awesome. He claims to be awesome though. Were you serious about advocating a policy lynch? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:09 Koshi wrote: Worst reason ever. Why Yamato. Because do you see how people like rayn give LoneMeow a townread for picking Yamato. But how did LoneMeow now this before reading the thread that he had to Mason Yamato. Why not somebody he played with in the newbies? Or somebody that understand how he posts. Or somebody he scumhunts easy with. Why Yamato I explained this earlier. can't quote cos back to a phone now. detailed precise claims are usually scum. and poorly executred!, unbelievable ones are normally town. regardless, lone is not a heavy contributor and this pressure is just going to alienate an already low content poster. back off. lastly the problem I have with your line of questioning is that its not going to produce an alignment indicative outcome. in essence, you are badgering him. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:12 LoneMeow wrote: I'd like to hear if you think yamato outing me is alignment indicative or not. Something about raynpelikoneet is bothering me, but I can't pin it down on any specific post. I didn't like how strongly he defended me, though. I was really surprised to hear StorrZerg is not a new player, considering he's played in newbies recently. That makes me a bit confused about how to read him. As the StorrZerg I watched play in newbie game, I'd give him a null, but if he's supposed to be more experienced I'm not so sure if I should be instead leaning scum on him. I had a town read on yam prior to that. the action to out you did not change that read. its funny. yam normally likes to come out and make a post with 3 to 4 scummers on it, and I find him scummy. he doesn't do that this game and I find him town. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
BC could be scum, but you aren't even trying to interact with him to develop the read further. it comes down to asset management. BC is a highly respected vet. let's entertain you and say he is scum. there are still 5 others out there, 4 if you include storrzerg. the risak of losing a town BC far exceeds the gain from losing a scum BC, this early on in my opinion. instead of standing on the soap box. if you genuinely want votes from people such as myself, you are going to have to work for it. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
the credibility keeps dropping, wtf..,, if filter dived as for real, its clear ve is town and yam is town.,,, koshi, again, why aren't u running for mayor? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:47 raynpelikoneet wrote: I mean: this is pretty bad.. ...but this is pretty good. ??? a day1 town BC loss is a massive win for scum. if he is scum and lynched. course its a good win fie town, but the team still has 5 members and can continue as before. I think in this scenario, the benefit of a town vet outweighs a scum vet. its why people say leave marv and palmar to day 2 or 3 regardless of performance. BC fits into that grouping. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:51 Koshi wrote: I don't even know what you are saying here. But I would say that Yam and VE look pretty town. Are you telling me that supersoft his actions that I quoted proved that and therefore can't be scum or what? I don't know why I should run for Mayor. For me running for Mayor is just for shit and giggles. But I simply didn't know how to approach it early game. sorry auto correct. ss recent filter clearly states her has town reads on yam and ve | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:53 raynpelikoneet wrote: It's bad because we lynch BC if he is scum and we don't lynch him if he is town. The argument of weighing the pros and cons of lynching him is nonsense. there's a difference thinking someone is scum and wanting to lynch them. I'm not going to say anything else on the matter. we can agree to disagree. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:57 yamato77 wrote: wires are crossed here.There are likely more town vets than there are scum vets, so it is actually worse for scum to lose what is potentially their leader than it is for town to lose one vet amongst five or six people who could reasonably lead the game. But again, I have never believed in putting off lynches just for vet status. This is a bad argument and I don't agree in the slightest. You're just giving them more time alive for no good reason. He has to earn the right to live in my town just like the rest of you do. I am completely against vets standing on a pedestal, or hiding behind reputation. I am also against someone establishing townieness and then trying to push a lynch off feeling. you haven't convinced me BC is the best lynch for today, and your approach is not conducive yo changing my mind either. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 16 2013 00:00 yamato77 wrote: So Moc, do you think BC is scum or town? Because it seems like you agree that you think he is scummy, yet oppose his lynch on highly dubious grounds. If that's the case, I'll grant your wish and we'll lynch you in lieu of BC. stop being a douche. you may be a town read, but you don't have more votes than me. get off the high horse. as for the question. off memory I had no issue with BC. its prob ego based though as he supported my RNG thoughts on storrzerg. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 16 2013 00:04 yamato77 wrote: That's not what you said. You clearly argued for vet protection for essentially no good reason. But whatever. What would you like me to do, point out specific posts where he says nothing? If you don't agree that he's essentially posting fluff, why don't you give your read on the matter? Right now it seems like you just want to play foil. more misconstrued reading. as I said.your approach hasn't sold me. iyou said a bunch of things with no backing, I'm on a phone and its not easy to see where you are coming from. if it was a shitty lurker, maybe I could agree. but in my opinion a vet deserves more effort based on asset management. the risk of being wrong is severe. you are back to being too cocky/confident which has always been your weakness. its disappointing. if you have such a strong scum read on BC, you should be able to manifest this in an easy to dsicern manner. instead, I tell you that you haven't convinced me, and instead you try to insinuate in scum. now I know for fact you are worthless as a mayor. too self absorbed to even consider if you are wrong, I want to win the game, not be voted in as mayor, clearly we have two different objectives, | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
But got good laughs from Migs spreadsheet post at least. I thought this guy was meant to be a vet? How the fuck am I scum read lol. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 16 2013 23:18 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Do you have anything useful to add Mocsta? A lot has happened since your last posts. bbycakes Im building my posts/cases now. Will submit when Im ready, not when asked. If you want to know about thread critical issues: (1) I think VE is town enough to not have qualms with him being mayor. I would prefer if he was more transparent with choice of lynch, as knowing VE he could lynch any of the 29 other players on a whim. Having said that, his subset of 4 players appears some-what reasonable for this stage of the cycle. (2) I do not support yamato as pardoner. Whilst I am inclined to lean town on him, I do not trust his judgement on the usage of the power. Maybe he would argue he doesn't trust my judgement to use it.. but then again, my intention would be *NOT* to use it, so the point is moot. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 16 2013 23:46 Spaghetticus wrote: Okay thanks guys. That puts it at midday, maybe I'll tell these fools to go buy lunch or something. I'll still be checking in everynow and then as I write this campaign, but my responses may be short. Spaghetticus I am finding you hard to read. Posts are verbose and complicated -- everything I expect from a scum spag trying to bamboozle the thread. Have a go at this: You haven't played the game for at least 6 months. VE has been playing for more than 6 months. 1/3 of the thread thinks VE is not only town, but a strong enough candidate to be voted mayor. Some of those may even be players that you think are town and possibly respect. Why would you try and smear his campaign? Is this guy really your best scum read that you are willing to shit the thread up to smite VE? I don't get a Spag that is town would do this... because I sure as hell know this is how scum spag likes to play. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [case] + On November 16 2013 08:49 StorrZerg wrote: This was never the crux of my argumentation. I am getting really agitated people keep saying this, and I think this is a total cop out. @mocsta im town way to call me scum on my bday not cool bro not cool. As for your reasons, i propose a different way to approach things thus i have to be scum? I can understand the "meta" is to vote someone into mayor that is a great scum hunter, so we can get a scum lynch day 1. I don't get how saying hunting for scum, is a scum tell and that my mind set should be hunting scum. Specially since im Town. Other wise, i think im leaning more town on you right now. Yes i think your case was a bit weak on myself, "lynch bait", yet i know i didn't provide much content to the game yet either. You have gotten some flak on your case against me (saying your going for lynch bait). regardless i am interested in the next person you present a case on since i think you are actually scum hunting. This reads to me as an appeal to let you off the noose -> hence the subtle/subliminal push for me to present a case on another person. *IF* you were so worried about analysing my next case I would be a null read. Instead, you try and appeal to my ego by calling me town. From this re-entry, my read has not waivered: scum Still catching up page 40 ish right now. I don't like this call out. It feels opportunistic and half-hearted. Its too general, does not have a strong stance attached to it - which makes me doubt the intentions as genuine; and lastly, adds nothing to a player that has already come under some scrutiny. This is in essence a "+1" post.have not liked what mattchew has had to say so far. Fluff with no reasons for reads. maybe he has provided more input idk yet. Also side note, i probably should have been taking notes or something while reading the thread, so many people so many names. An alignment null post, however, is a very convenient excuse to walk away from this pressure.Well what i said pregame will still happen. (will be gone most of Saturday, i doubt ill get any reception while in the mountains) but ill try and post when i can and i will be back on Sunday morning. Considering this it really was silly for me to attempt to run. I just can't be active enough during this start time to do what needs to be done. On November 16 2013 09:14 StorrZerg wrote: As stated above. Too generic, and does *nothing* to gain traction on a mattchew lynch.my opinion this game has nothing to do with previous game. i feel his posts have had lack of reason for his reads, and poor content thus he is leaning scummy If town: There is no congruency between the post above, and your ethos to "hunt for scum" On November 16 2013 09:32 StorrZerg wrote: Mostly Fluff. However I am curious about the reads on Holyflare/VE.1. I don't understand this.. mind saying it differently? As for mayor, i personally never considered myself a serious contender for mayor. I've never run for one before. 2. Leaning town on mocsta, leaning town on Holyflare (I liked his opening post for mayor) VE null atm, I don't feel he has been scum hunting that greatly yet, I do like how active he is. I'm currently still catching up on the thread. 3. Not really. Usually i tend to post my notes while im working on a post. (or at least i did that in my last game which was the previous newby game) I have not dived into filters yet so i have not "hunted for scum" or "found townies" My main focus is catching up on the thread. Posting some opinions. Then diving into filters. I find Holyflare to be nullish, and whilst a majority found the post scummy or null - he declares town. I am even more surprised by the VE commentary: confident enough to state that VE has been scum hunting poorly. Yet he has not caught up on the thread? On November 16 2013 10:09 StorrZerg wrote: I won't detail the newbie card any further. Its been done to death. He clearly is fairly experienced.( i just got to BC attack on myself/grack) @BC i am new to TL mafia. this is my 4th game in this forum. 1 of which was many years ago. 1 was a themed game, 1 was a newbie game. This is still a "new thing" for me. Regardless what you think. You might have a different opinion on the matter, but that's it an opinion. As far as being active and playing tons of mafia on all other places lol? I can think of one other site, but i consider those mafia games (a few games...) quite different because of the atmosphere. Right now i'm trying to decide how to read you... I'd say it feels pretty obvious we can't both be scum. I talk a ton in qts, (ask matt, hogwarts game hufflepuff qt. ) And undoubtedly i would have been instructed... So my question is, are you trying to use outside tl mafia information to sway town to lynch a person based on just "a lie" Or does town BC really need to be nit picky about this? I can agree it seemed a bit odd that grack "defended me" I think he more so questioned wording that mocsta gave (hunting for scum vs hunting scum) which i have to agree, i don't see the point on that from mocsta. After this, i think i am more inclined to think you are mafia. I can't agree with your lynch candidates right now, or the reasoning behind them. I find the comment in red strange, I can't put my finger on it but its just something that I would not be thinking about in my head. (i.e. with that phrasing there is a scenario where Storrzerg is scum and BC town.) Really odd defense. Its also interesting to note that Storrzerg chooses to lean mafia on BC and town on myself even though we are the two prime attackers. Its curious to note that universal town read yamato wants the blood of BC - and Storrzerg is now pushing BC. Then a bunch of fluff + pushing BC. Then we get: On November 16 2013 11:14 StorrZerg wrote: Decided to look at austinmcc filter first. I can't say i like how he has kept questioning the troll question. (and again, i'd put trolls under useless/inactive town) Other than that, i like his approach to the game, how he is asking questions. I also like how he is presenting his reads, in particular his Pandain read/thoughts. I'm happy with how he is askingg his questions in general. I would lean town on austinmcc. @austinmcc what is your read on BC? would you agree his cause to lynch trolls is not alignment specific? Regardless of that answer, if you take that out, what makes him town or scum with how he has been playing this game so far? I am FIRMLY null on Austin. Hes a slippery mudafarker and frankly I expected him to run for mayor. The concern here is that now Storrzerg has thrown out 3 town reads and delivered 2 scum reads (both of whom have come under scrutiny at different points int he game). For someone so concerned about finding scum.. why is he happy with how austin has questioned pandain? Is pandain scum... im not seeing any "hunting for scum" in storrzergs approach to this game. On November 16 2013 11:29 StorrZerg wrote: This is in essence a big fat summary post.Now lets take a better look at mattchew + Show Spoiler [case on mattchew] + I understand mattchew plays the game, by finding town and adding more town to his circle. And by that process he finds scum since they are not in his circle. How ever i am not so keen on him throwing town reads with no reason. (as he first starts out throwing one on VE) On November 15 2013 12:47 Mattchew wrote: Yam and mocsta are town but i dont agree with Mocsta's case on Storr. I saw his conclusion, read storrs filter for myself, then read his case, and reconsidered but was not swayed into putting storr anywhere but neutral. Storr is going to play different, because he comes from a different type of mafia. Mocsta sometimes equivocates different to scum again Yam, random town read no real reason. I can "assume" he is getting a town read from mocsta because he believes mocsta is scum hunting. I shouldn't assume however.. I'd prefer matt to explain in a few more words why he feels this way. He seems a bit better with how he read the situation. (since i came to a similar conclusion mocsta town, im town) He changes his read on Alakaslam because of Alakaslam post responding to yamato. again, where are the reasons? After i said i was leaning scum on mattchew, On November 16 2013 09:33 Mattchew wrote: mattchew is town i lean town on storr too His read on myself has now changed. Why? again lack of reasoning. And most recent post On November 16 2013 09:33 Mattchew wrote: BC can be lynched and im ok with that, same with koshi Not to sure why he is ok with these people, personally i am fine with a BC lynch since i feel he has not been looking for scum, just low hanging fruit. In the end, i have not found mattchew to have done anything yet in this game. His reads have had no reasoning what so ever save for 1 comment defending myself. I am putting him my scum circle for now. Matt did this, matt did that. No explanation of why it exhibits a mafia mindset. Nor does it lead to any pressure on matt to follow up with. This is feigning contribution at its absolute finest. Storrzerg has made lots of promises to find scum. However, his filter clearly demonstrates that he is playing lazy scum. - Only picks on players that have been targetted by others - Gives out several town reads with weak rationale. - Is constantly feigning contributions - Lastly, appeals to my ego by calling me town, which contradicts his mindset to analyse my further cases Storrzerg is scum. Either vote me for mayor, or lynch storrzerg as prime target. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 00:21 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Also, Mocsta is scum. His case on StorrZerg was awfully artificial to begin with and he hasn't brought it back up since returning to the thread. As soon as Spaghetticus sticks his neck out and someone questioned about him before, Mocsta sees his chance of casting suspicion on someone and trying to gain some town cred. 30 minutes after his giant case Mocsta already calls it bogus, clearly not having read it properly as he says: When Spaghetti clearly indicates he doesn't want to lynch VE, he just wants him to not become mayor, which would be evident if he actually read the case properly. Mocsta saw an opportunity to make someone look bad and took it. He wasn't interested in actually finding out his alignment. I wish to see him hang. This is an absolute joke. Why are you intentionally trying to manipulate this situation into your favour. Explain now how I "trying to gain some town cred" by querying spaggheticus. FYI, I did not read the entire diatribe on VE. Kudos to you if you did, however, to me: the intent is the same as far as im concerned. Its shitting up the thread on someone that is a valid candidate in my opinion. I vehemently disagree on your last statement. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 00:27 Spaghetticus wrote: + Show Spoiler + On November 16 2013 23:53 Mocsta wrote: Spaghetticus I am finding you hard to read. Posts are verbose and complicated -- everything I expect from a scum spag trying to bamboozle the thread. Have a go at this: You haven't played the game for at least 6 months. VE has been playing for more than 6 months. 1/3 of the thread thinks VE is not only town, but a strong enough candidate to be voted mayor. Some of those may even be players that you think are town and possibly respect. Why would you try and smear his campaign? Is this guy really your best scum read that you are willing to shit the thread up to smite VE? I don't get a Spag that is town would do this... because I sure as hell know this is how scum spag likes to play. You know I'm always fairly articulate and value precision. My posts are dense but difficult to misconstrue. I also feel that since there are so few of them, they are worth the effort to read, but also partly make up for my time difficulties. I'm sorry but arguments that appeal to authority rarely sway me. If there are reasons why you guys think he is town, state them. If you can't think of any reasons, reevaluate. Why would I try to smear his campaign? Well... I'm not advocating any candidate in particular, which rules out a scum power play. By leaving it open-ended however, you could interpret it (as you have) that I am trying to cause discord. This is possible, but I think you're overestimating my previous impact. Out of the games I have played, three have been town. Out of those games, I almost always sit around spellchecking until I think I've gathered enough information to make a case, whereby I try to make it count for as much as possible. These cases often fly in the face of common town sentiment, whiteknighting the picked upon players, for instance, and painting their accusers as manipulators. I have very little recollection of our scum game together, though I remember bits and pieces. + Show Spoiler + We were massively behind due to the third scummer making a dodgy move then AFKing. We got JSL to step in and help but ultimately lost. I can't recall what my plan for getting us out of that pickle was, but I know that it didn't go well. Bugger it, I'm going to look it up so I don't look foolish, but srsly this is hurting my time. THIS was our scum QT. Oats was in that game too, in fact, I was replacing Kush, so that's two more who may be able to verify. My style in that game was to rip into my scum buddies (in which case we should still kill VE). We were essentially killed by a lucky cop. I don't think there was any point at which I tried to create mayhem by making conflated cases on town. What I remember most about that game was feeling that all the town were so obviously town to me, how could I possibly make a decent case that sounded believable? At any rate, you and I Mocsta, have a history of always thinking each other scum and being overly paranoid. I was hoping that given our most recent scumming together I could come into this game confident that I'd be able to spot you if you were scum, but someone said you'd got quite good at it, which is unfortunate. Nevertheless I still think you townish, and would have you as mayor over VE, and probably over Yamato depending on who you're planning to lynch. [actually now reading Artanis' post, I'm doubtful again]. Artanis, thankyou. Your read is very accurate, and Mocsta should be able to verify (if he's not trying to create discord) that I am a particularly paranoid player, though I think myself perhaps less paranoid than in my newbies. I think Mocsta's reaction is consistent with our prior interactions in our newbies, but not with the experience Mocsta is supposed to have accumulated since then, which has given me new doubts. hmmmm, the step down memory lane went different than i remember than i suppose. I remember that game we were bussing yes; but I had a strong memory of you intentionally trying to go against thread sentiment at a pivotal time. Hence my concern. Either way, I like this response. The tone feels sincere/genuine. As far as I am concerned you are not a priority today. Also, yes. I can verify that you *were* an overly paranoid player and agree with the town assessment of yourself from the newbies. You said artanis read is accurate: I presume you are referring to him calling you town. What do you make of his points/case on myself. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 00:44 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Firstly, it doesnt matter if he spoilered it or not. He was asking for follow-ups on something I find to be irrelevant, useless, and yes - shitting the thread. I think my point is extremely valid, and you are starting to give me the shits about this.Tell me why any scum attacks any town player? Is that really a question? Yeah, it's definitely shitting up the thread when he posted his case in a spoiler tag to prevent exactly that. You just threw out an accusation because you saw an easy opportunity to do so that you thought had little chance of backfiring. That's been your entire game so far. You've attacked StorrZerg, Grackaroni, and Hopeless1der, all easy targets, and now you saw another one to add to the list. You're scum bro. Why are you avoiding having a genuine discussion with me? instead you have to discredit me by saying my reads are 'easy targets" I stand by Storrzerg and Grack as scum. Hopeless was more an observation. Since when is "easy target" not equivocal to being mafia? You are skewing everything to fit your story and I'm finding this to be damn scummy. Whose scum Artanis. What, me Sharrant, and who else? Cos from a glance of your filter I see a bunch more town reads than scum reads. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 00:54 Koshi wrote: 1-2 sentences why rayn can't be scum / rayn is scum is always appreciated. If the points are true the case reads alright. i do expect more 'follow-through' from a town rayn. Problem is, I have to read his filter to see the quotes/interactions and too tired to do that now + going to bed now anyways. So, I still think storrzerg is the best choice. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 00:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Now you are making yourself look stupid.I'm attacking you on what's important. You showed a clear scum mindset when you jumped on the opportunity to attack a player that wasn't established as town by anyone. I figure any townie can see how Spaghetti is clearly town from how paranoid he was in the past. I therefore find you likely to be scum. You've only attacked players that were easy to target and had, if my memory serves me right, already been attacked by others, but that's not as relevant. The main point is you attacked Spaghetti because you saw an opportunity to incriminate him, not because you actually believed him to be scum. This is made clear by not even having read the case that you found disruptive. This means you didn't even consider it. I'm not skewing anything, I'm calling it as I read it. I have other suspects which have been made clear in my filter. You're by far on number one right now though, and I appreciate the panic chainsaw defense. Chainsaw defense on who? (1) I was the first to attack Storr, and I believe the first to attack Grack -- I should be as he immediately retaliated against me. Your points are making no sense Artanis. Are you tunneled or jsut bullshitting off the cuff? (2) Say what you will about not reading the VE spoiler, but heres the header: On November 16 2013 23:20 Spaghetticus wrote: My preliminary case on VE I think this post important, as I both want it to be used in shutting down VE's attempt at mayordom, but also potentially later to launch an investigation on him. I've spoilered it as it is large, but do not disregard it please. I've done this entirely through a prolonged filter dive, so there is some information missing. Shall I reemphasize case + shutting down VEs attempt at mayordom?? Of coutrse I opened the spoiler, and in the same motion deemed it too much information. But let me guess, I am scum for that. Fact is, I disagreed with Spag conclusion and stand by it. What I also disagree with is your approach to faking pressure on me. I say faking because all your pressure is through misconstruing fact. I can only assume you think Storrzerg is town too? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
fair points on Austin. It is true that the play he has shown is more than capable from his scum game. I also noted in my storr case an interaction he shared with Austin that was odd. On November 17 2013 00:31 Mocsta wrote: I am FIRMLY null on Austin. Hes a slippery mudafarker and frankly I expected him to run for mayor. The concern here is that now Storrzerg has thrown out 3 town reads and delivered 2 scum reads (both of whom have come under scrutiny at different points int he game). For someone so concerned about finding scum.. why is he happy with how austin has questioned pandain? Is pandain scum... im not seeing any "hunting for scum" in storrzergs approach to this game. Night anyways. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 01:21 Artanis[Xp] wrote: What I meant was OMGUS. My apologies for the wrong term. Ah yes, I remember your initial case against Storr. It was an amazing one with great points such as hunt for scum, and how he wishes to use rng, which has proven to be a great scumtell in the past. BC already attacked Grackaroni before you did. You were having a back and forth with him but didn't accuse him until others already did. Yes. Shutting down VE's attempt at mayordom is something different from wanting him lynched isn't it? Well, if you're going to call someone scum for something then not read what that is then that's pretty damning. And I'm construing it in a way that makes sense to me. I can't see a townie consider Spaghetticus scum for what he said, especially with the tenacity and speed that you jumped on it showed little reflection. This is absolutely pointless now and shitting the thread. I made a new case on Storrzerg dipshit. + your points on Grack are weak. What, am I meant to accuse all 6 people I think could be scum.. that they are scum at the same time? Lastly, when someone says they are making a preliminary "case".. the natural interpretation is push for a lynch. Stop being useless and wasting my time Artanis. Good night. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 01:26 VisceraEyes wrote: This one. I didn't like his initial post on austin, mainly because austin is a hard player to read anyway and Storr is generally not familiar with austin's playstyle. But then he went and looked at Mattchew. He recently played a game where he and Matt got pretty cozy in a mason QT together (or cozy SOMEWHERE, huehue). This is the type of read I'd expect a townStorr to try and make...one on someone he's more familiar with. The post itself is okay - no better or worse than any other PbPA posts, but the intent and motivation are what I liked about it. Personally I found this to be a summary post. As for mattchew mindset, I didnt think it added anything new to the discussion that occured a fair bit before storrzerg entered the fray. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 20:56 supersoft wrote: Mocsta would have been a better lynch, since we had many opinions on him. SS, Frankly I expect better from you. I thought you were meant to be good at this game? Instead you are listening to the words of a guy that had a tunneled outlook on me before I even posted yesterday; and a guy that is clearly scum -- The latter I will be adding more towards at the resolution part of this cycle. On November 17 2013 03:35 austinmcc wrote: Mocsta, any particular reason you asked supersoft about hopeless1der early on? Why ask super about that? And what sort of answer would you expect him to give + how would that influence anything? I haven't seen Hopeless troll before. In my opinion his trolling at face value felt like he was posting for the sake of posting. It was an observation and after the flak i copped with storrzerg i wanted a second opinion. Super is meant to be analytical so I asked him. I thought this was all clear cut in the original post? As for the second part, it was an observation. I dunno where it was leading. Since then, Hopeless has done nothing but also seems to be in a position where perhaps he should ask for a replacement?? What more is there to read into him? As useless as Mattchew et all. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 23:12 Spaghetticus wrote: [/red]Artanis won't believe yoiu just said that... ohh my my[erd]I want him dead. That lynch confirmed that I was right to not want him mayor at the very least. I'm struggling to see how he could possibly be town, though I'm willing to admit that there may be some meta thang the rest of you have access to, like in the case of BH. Spag A mayor choosing a mislynch does not equate to the mayor being scum. Get over it. 2 Scum are in this subset [Storrzerg, Grack] | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
I'm gonna unleash a case on this fucker later on. But he is the cause of my pain this game: constantly trying to discredit me since I targetted his buddy Storrzerg. The worse thing is, he has been so consistent repeating the same message that others are starting to buy it. STOP! Heres a teaser (one post) of why Grack is scum and it involves "information advantage" On November 17 2013 08:35 Grackaroni wrote: Vayne is hard to read, we all know that. I have a slight town read on him mainly because I have never seen him post coherently before (in small doses I admit). But in the end, whether Vayne is town or scum doesn't matter.What is with all of the Vayne attacks? He actually tries harder as scum and tries to steer town in the wrong direction. In golden sun he even wrote a case at the start of the day. All he cares about is that he hasn't been lynched as scum. I'm quite convinced he doesn't try as town to help his scum win rate. Note the surrender from ## mafia. The point is Gracks choice of words infer that he *KNOWS* what the wrong direction is. Read this phrase again, the inference is as clear as daylight when the sun is shining. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 23:30 Spaghetticus wrote: Mocsta The mayor mislynching does not make someone scum, but that's not what I was saying... so... He chose to kill the only other person on his arse. I'd really like to see anything that singled Skanjab out for scum other than that he did not like VE. There were plenty of candidates... He's not playing a town game, he's playing a VE game, and that could quite possibly mean a scum game. Actually, Skanjab was playing pretty different to Hogwarts. I think the kill was OK, shortterm outcome no, but longterm yes. Every game you get "unknowns" like Grush57s/Kushs etc. Everyone always complains I don't want to go to LYLO with this guy. VE ensured that did not occur. Why are you so certain he is not playing a "town game"? How well do you know VE... have you even played with him before? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 23:32 Spaghetticus wrote: Again, Artanis would beg to differ.It's not like I didn't think him scum before his massively petty and bad mislynch... Why did people want him mayor? Honestly, I'm at a loss. What do you think of my Gracktease. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 23:40 OOHCHILD wrote: mocsta not meaning to defend grack right now, but I think you are misreading that. His point is that vayne is not steering town at all. He is saying that it's the steering that makes Vayne town, the fact that it is in the wrong direction is just an extension of him being scum. He isn't making any assumption about the correctness of vayne's reads this game. kk this time unedited On November 17 2013 08:35 Grackaroni wrote: What is with all of the Vayne attacks? He actually tries harder as scum and tries to steer town in the wrong direction. In golden sun he even wrote a case at the start of the day. All he cares about is that he hasn't been lynched as scum. I'm quite convinced he doesn't try as town to help his scum win rate. Note the surrender from ## mafia. Fair call on the interpretation. *PERHAPS* that was the original intent. My counter: Has Vayne had a lack of steering? If anything, Vayne has been quite forthcoming with his opinion on certain things. Especially for Day1 Vayne. As I stated earlier, I have never seen Vayne post coherently in succession before. The extension is that he is trying which is in contrast to your interpretation of Gracks statement. Surely, if Grack is confident enough to comment on Vayne, he is aware of the filter content of Vayne -- thus, leading to a mindset of information advantage either way. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 23:51 OOHCHILD wrote: mocsta you ever play with town vayne? way more try hard i think. I played with him in Hogwarts and made a case on him before he was modkilled. He was town. I played with scum vayne in ?sicilian?. That game he was trolly but more in an aggro way than carefree. I recall one quote from Vayne saying he "RNGs his personalities" before a game starts. Either way he is difficult to read in general, but the filter doesn't lie. He has been forthcoming with his stances several times in the game. Enough such he is not of concern to me at this stage. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 23:54 Oatsmaster wrote: scum vayne is super tryhard. Oats, Whats up with you this game? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 23:58 OOHCHILD wrote: doesn' t matter how right it is. Many players believe it to be true, so it's a standard, alignment null, metaread from grackster No. This is playing what I wrote down completely by lumping it into a general spiel category. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 23:58 Spaghetticus wrote: Please repsond to my previous comments about VE on the previous page.If Vayne is playing a controlling game I've missed it, but I've also payed very little attention to them. Honestly I think people put too much weight on metas, particularly since every game when someone is discussed they have all their tells given to them. If only there were some way for an intelligent organism to adjust their behaviour to adapt to environmental input? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 17 2013 23:38 Mocsta wrote: *snip* Why are you so certain he is not playing a "town game"? How well do you know VE... have you even played with him before? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 00:04 OOHCHILD wrote: Your cases the suck this game mocsta. Many people have commented on it. Are you disagreeing with my opinion on that post; or disagreeing that Grack is scum? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 00:18 Oatsmaster wrote: do you have a point mocsta? Yeah, Im finding you really distant this game - like you dont give a fuck about the game. And you haven't used your trademark on anyone as far as I know. Whats up with that? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 00:26 Oatsmaster wrote: Im scum. Ah k, so whose the 5 others? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 00:27 Spaghetticus wrote: Oh, sorry Mocsta. I have not played any games with VE, but I've already said as much, so what you really mean to say is shut up spag you haven't played any games with VE. When you spend as long as he is putting in effort to have a presence, but do diddly fuck-all to hunt scum or actually further the hunt in a direct alignment indicative way, you are not portraying yourself as town. All of his contributions have been second hand, guiding the hunt rather than participating in it. When I demanded that he answer for his lack of contribution in contrast to the apparent effort he's putting into his election platform, he blatantly refused to even partake in discussion. He knows he can get away with not discussing his contribution (he's getting away with it right now), and he does not want to be analysed #scummyplays Furthermore, I shouldn't really have to explain this all again. I've done an exhaustive filter dive and given a lot of my reasoning. You complained about me clogging up the thread with it (without reading it), and now ask for me to repeat it? + Show Spoiler + On November 16 2013 23:20 Spaghetticus wrote: My preliminary case on VE I think this post important, as I both want it to be used in shutting down VE's attempt at mayordom, but also potentially later to launch an investigation on him. I've spoilered it as it is large, but do not disregard it please. I've done this entirely through a prolonged filter dive, so there is some information missing. + Show Spoiler + Context: VE has been giving a town vibe to most, including until recently, myself. Skimming the thread he seems to post a lot, and not done anything particularly scummy. It is the accumulation of microswings that has me suspicious. He is currently winning the election, the threat on the table to have him as mayor, and yamato as pardoner. I do not want either of these things to happen. I’m not trying to get him lynched, as I see him as not a threat if scum. He’s giving information too easily so far for him to not be caught. I just want him to not be mayor, and you should too. VE has an eight page filter, which is appropriate since he’s running for mayor. The density of useful information is low, which is not at all appropriate. Page 1 First half page is pregame chatter Second half he launches his platform for candidacy. His platform essentially promises that he will lynch someone, but won’t commit to anything. Good politics, but does not give town anything to work with. He then gives a town read and a thumbs up to yamato, but this is no big deal since yamato is pretty much confirmed town. Page 2 He doesn't like SS's tone, which I agree with, but is fairly easy pickings. + Show Spoiler + He defends his townread on yamato He reprimands yamato's scumcall on Super. Honestly I'd be tempted to call scum here too, but I don't know super. Supersoft's idea that he should be mayor so as he does not get NKed isn't entirely stupid if he has that particular history, that his thinking that we should just agree with him when we don't know his alignment is blatantly retarded. I don't know what I think of lynching Kush yet because Kush hasn't arrived. So I have no opinion of your platform as yet. This seems fake. Even I know of the infamous Kush, and I know that what he does in thread is always going to be difficult to read. People should use policies to deal with unreadable wildcards, not openmindedness. Page 3 He townreads HF from a probable pregame constructed pitch. Sounds like someone trying to sound like he has an opinion. He defends his perspective by saying the point line up with his own pitch, and he knows he's town and so can infer HF's townishess. This should not convince anyone considering the likelihood that the points were made prior to roles being allotted, and the defense is circular logic that relies on us thinking him already town. I do think that the defense does have a egocentric townish gleam to it, but this does little to counter the fact that he endorsed another player for reasons a critical town mind should have considered and rejected. He later addresses this criticism by saying it's possible it was written ingame, but since he does not have that information, this claim is an agnostic one, and does little to justify his town claim which really should come under fire. Scum like to look like town by making reads, but they don't like having to go through the motions of justifying that rationale since that's so much effort wasted. This was a scummy move and it demands more explanation. He then makes this happen: On November 15 2013 10:38 VisceraEyes wrote: I like that people are talking about Sharrant as well. Yes, this is most excellent. Which is an instance I spoke about previously but could not recall who had been in this hunt. I still do not know who he refers to, as I am diving his filter ATM, but this looks like scum seeing that time is being wasted, and encouraging it. At this point, Sharrane had said nothing alignment indicative. they weren't even the least active player, as I hadn't posted yet. People that cherrypick specific but ultimately unjustifiable scumhunting to endorse, but do bugger-all scumhubting themselves, despite having quite probably the largest filter in the game, are not think about what's best for town. People that are not thinking about what's best for town, are not good town. or not town at all. People that are not good town should not be mayor. Page 4 He sets up an irrational reason to butt heads with Mocsta if need be. + Show Spoiler + On November 15 2013 11:11 VisceraEyes wrote: No matter what you do or say, I won't vote you for mayor this game because I hold grudges and last time I gave you the benefit of the doubt I got burned when an ounce of the same from you could have swung the game in our favor; get punished for that act now and it is expunged. That being said, I'm interested to see StorrZerg actually provide some content before deciding whether I think he's mafia - content with regard to others' alignment and what he thinks about it. For a town there is no reason for this, for a mafia, this is a justification to be unreasonable later. Not a town move. He defends Storrzerg from Mocsta, on some fluff laden ground that he may not be new to the game, but is new to the format or some such. Bullshit. I'm way newer than that guys and I'm not shiteating my way into a BPvest by newbclaiming. I din't agree with some of Moc's points, but Storrzerg's noob-spiel was scummy as shit. Claiming otherwise requires remarkable reasoning that is yet to be provided. VE then starts waving sticks at Grack. I don't feel good about Grack, so this is justified in my eyes, but it's damn low-hanging fruit. + Show Spoiler + Even if they are scum team (which I personally need to really consider as I think them both scummy on individual merit), they both know Grack isn't surviving until the end. VE's mayor platform names Grack as a candidate, but vehemently refuses to lock down to one target as this might give scum information. By not naming anyone, a mayor VE can put off killing Grack for 1-3 days easy, maximising confusion and killing the town clock. He then starts making a show of playing nice with Oats (this may have been happening for awhile, my view from the filter is limited). If he didn't make a show of it, I'd get a town read. That he made a show of it, makes is premeditated and worthless in terms of alignment indication. Page 5 He asks Mocsta about Storrzerg, Grack, and HF. More getting other people to do his hunting/reasoning/justification. Note: Why even ask about Grack? I may be being a little narrow-minded, but Grack's status seems objectively unmisinterpretable? If you're town, why ask questions to which you already know the answers? More fluff Page 6 At the top of page 6 of his filter, VE launches his campaign anew, which I think is a good idea if you're planning on evolving to suit your demographic. Good politics. His lynch list is anyone of four people, which IMO is cowardly, though in some ways reasonable. He denies scum info, but doesn't have to make any promises. I personally do not like this, and I have already covered how this could be a powerful scum maneuver. Personally I'm confident I know who he will lynch if he is town, and if it is that obvious then scum could know and it's just poor town play. For reference, his list is Grackaroni, Storrzerg, Sharrant, and Skanjab1s In the same post, he encourages yamato to be an active pardoner, which I think looks scummy. Yamato was straight up and honest about his views on this, and his honesty is making things nice and clear for town that we don't want him as pardoner. Ve is encouraging someone to make anti-town actions, and will later be able to criticise the specifics of those actions if they turn out poorly. "I wanted you to use the power, but not to save a scummer!' He then, over the course of defending his decision to back yamato as pardoner, realises that both the mayor and pardoner get vests. I don't know what to make of this, I could probably paint this red, but I don't thinks it's indicative. Nudges yamato for mason information. More externalising the hunt. He adds Pardain to the list. I don't know how I feel about the fact that it's Pardain, since to my knowledge Pardain has not done anything noteworthy. I do not like that he's further expanding his lynch options. Gives BC and Mocsta a town read. Page 8 His new list: Skanjab, Pandain, and Sharrant. Are you kidding? I though Grack the obvious pick since the rest were no names.. Storrzerg is still on my to-do list, but he's not nearly of the same magnitude of scumminess as Grack. Now he's taken off both my scummy picks to put up a solid list of people of whom I do not recall a single thing? Sure they're not confirmed town, but how about an actual case for anyone of them being scum? Conclusion: The game VE plays is entirely political. He's keeping options open, and manipulating the town environment. He hasn't made any reasonable plays at cases, just held up lures to see which bait will get him elected. "Will any of you vote for me if I say that I might lynch X?" He hasn't done any town work that demonstrates town thought. He's shaped our hunt under the guise of pro-town sentiment. He's not putting himself in a position to be held accountable for his actions. He's no longer even contemplating lynching anyone I think particularly scummy. He's been very active but achieved very little. I think him scummy, but not necessarily a day 1 lynch. His momentum will get him caught if I am right and he is scum, but in the immediate, I absolutely do not want this person as my mayor. This is even more important, in that VE getting mayor puts Yamato as pardoner. I don't mind Yamato as mayor nearly as much as I do VE, but I'm happy for him to be out of the running entirely if someone else can step up. + Show Spoiler + On November 17 2013 01:36 Spaghetticus wrote: You're making an enemy. I suppose you still don't care... How is that a townish outlook? Nobody has ever given me more reason to tunnel than you. Gratz. + Show Spoiler + On November 17 2013 23:30 Spaghetticus wrote: Mocsta The mayor mislynching does not make someone scum, but that's not what I was saying... so... He chose to kill the only other person on his arse. I'd really like to see anything that singled Skanjab out for scum other than that he did not like VE. There were plenty of candidates... He's not playing a town game, he's playing a VE game, and that could quite possibly mean a scum game. Mocsta you need to put some effort into confirming yourself town. Your posturing has been sloppy, you're on my scumdar. I don't want to drill you since we're buds, but at this point you're starting to give me no choice. Don't hold back cos "we're buds". Thats stupid. I simply think your efforts on VE are misplaced (1) You don't know him -- and VE is a special type of player unpredictable enough to *BE* predictable (2) *IF* VE is scum -- you will catch him based on how he manipulates thread sentiment not necessarily his cases (3) That type of effort put into one guy 3/4 through Day1 is overkill for town (and DEFINITELY scum). Without reading the content: the subconscious already identifies a tunneled mindset. In short: I think what you are doing is pointless Whilst I found your entrance somewhat scummy, the effort is so high I do not believe you are intentionally feigning contribution. So... If you need a different direction to focus on post-VE: Stop meekly pointing fingers at me and do your filter dive. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 01:12 austinmcc wrote: Generally earlier than this. He's usually got some posts, and some decent posts, on D1 in the games that I have played with him. I don't find it particularly telling about his alignment, except for a nagging thought that maybe it's an indicator of assassinyness. That's an outside shot though, and I don't expect him or others to play assassiny, whatever that actually means (in my head, playing to avoid getting killed by any faction by normal means, sometimes town BH looks very town and gets shot N1, and assassinBH wouldn't really want that although he could say he was protected or whatever). Yeah hes an odd case right now. Clearly does not care. I dunno when is the right time to start trying to pry that shell. In Hogwarts we let him live prob 1 cycle too long. I don't mind the assassin read though. Considering he tried to claim he RNG'd a doc save as scum in Hogwarts, I am hardpressed to think he would rinse-repeat RNG in consecutive games. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 01:17 Spaghetticus wrote: For context, could you quicklist your three biggest scumreads? Who do you consider confirmed town? I don't find any one post particularly scumtelling. Probably the biggest swing in my perception was when Storrzerg claimed noob. I haven't followed him up since, figuring his input has been fairly limited and if someone prompts me it won't take long to be up to date. Everything to make an informed opinion is here: On November 17 2013 00:31 Mocsta wrote: Storrzerg + Show Spoiler [case] + On November 16 2013 08:49 StorrZerg wrote: This was never the crux of my argumentation. I am getting really agitated people keep saying this, and I think this is a total cop out. @mocsta im town way to call me scum on my bday not cool bro not cool. As for your reasons, i propose a different way to approach things thus i have to be scum? I can understand the "meta" is to vote someone into mayor that is a great scum hunter, so we can get a scum lynch day 1. I don't get how saying hunting for scum, is a scum tell and that my mind set should be hunting scum. Specially since im Town. Other wise, i think im leaning more town on you right now. Yes i think your case was a bit weak on myself, "lynch bait", yet i know i didn't provide much content to the game yet either. You have gotten some flak on your case against me (saying your going for lynch bait). regardless i am interested in the next person you present a case on since i think you are actually scum hunting. This reads to me as an appeal to let you off the noose -> hence the subtle/subliminal push for me to present a case on another person. *IF* you were so worried about analysing my next case I would be a null read. Instead, you try and appeal to my ego by calling me town. From this re-entry, my read has not waivered: scum Still catching up page 40 ish right now. I don't like this call out. It feels opportunistic and half-hearted. Its too general, does not have a strong stance attached to it - which makes me doubt the intentions as genuine; and lastly, adds nothing to a player that has already come under some scrutiny. This is in essence a "+1" post.have not liked what mattchew has had to say so far. Fluff with no reasons for reads. maybe he has provided more input idk yet. Also side note, i probably should have been taking notes or something while reading the thread, so many people so many names. An alignment null post, however, is a very convenient excuse to walk away from this pressure.Well what i said pregame will still happen. (will be gone most of Saturday, i doubt ill get any reception while in the mountains) but ill try and post when i can and i will be back on Sunday morning. Considering this it really was silly for me to attempt to run. I just can't be active enough during this start time to do what needs to be done. On November 16 2013 09:14 StorrZerg wrote: As stated above. Too generic, and does *nothing* to gain traction on a mattchew lynch.my opinion this game has nothing to do with previous game. i feel his posts have had lack of reason for his reads, and poor content thus he is leaning scummy If town: There is no congruency between the post above, and your ethos to "hunt for scum" On November 16 2013 09:32 StorrZerg wrote: Mostly Fluff. However I am curious about the reads on Holyflare/VE.1. I don't understand this.. mind saying it differently? As for mayor, i personally never considered myself a serious contender for mayor. I've never run for one before. 2. Leaning town on mocsta, leaning town on Holyflare (I liked his opening post for mayor) VE null atm, I don't feel he has been scum hunting that greatly yet, I do like how active he is. I'm currently still catching up on the thread. 3. Not really. Usually i tend to post my notes while im working on a post. (or at least i did that in my last game which was the previous newby game) I have not dived into filters yet so i have not "hunted for scum" or "found townies" My main focus is catching up on the thread. Posting some opinions. Then diving into filters. I find Holyflare to be nullish, and whilst a majority found the post scummy or null - he declares town. I am even more surprised by the VE commentary: confident enough to state that VE has been scum hunting poorly. Yet he has not caught up on the thread? On November 16 2013 10:09 StorrZerg wrote: I won't detail the newbie card any further. Its been done to death. He clearly is fairly experienced.( i just got to BC attack on myself/grack) @BC i am new to TL mafia. this is my 4th game in this forum. 1 of which was many years ago. 1 was a themed game, 1 was a newbie game. This is still a "new thing" for me. Regardless what you think. You might have a different opinion on the matter, but that's it an opinion. As far as being active and playing tons of mafia on all other places lol? I can think of one other site, but i consider those mafia games (a few games...) quite different because of the atmosphere. Right now i'm trying to decide how to read you... I'd say it feels pretty obvious we can't both be scum. I talk a ton in qts, (ask matt, hogwarts game hufflepuff qt. ) And undoubtedly i would have been instructed... So my question is, are you trying to use outside tl mafia information to sway town to lynch a person based on just "a lie" Or does town BC really need to be nit picky about this? I can agree it seemed a bit odd that grack "defended me" I think he more so questioned wording that mocsta gave (hunting for scum vs hunting scum) which i have to agree, i don't see the point on that from mocsta. After this, i think i am more inclined to think you are mafia. I can't agree with your lynch candidates right now, or the reasoning behind them. I find the comment in red strange, I can't put my finger on it but its just something that I would not be thinking about in my head. (i.e. with that phrasing there is a scenario where Storrzerg is scum and BC town.) Really odd defense. Its also interesting to note that Storrzerg chooses to lean mafia on BC and town on myself even though we are the two prime attackers. Its curious to note that universal town read yamato wants the blood of BC - and Storrzerg is now pushing BC. Then a bunch of fluff + pushing BC. Then we get: On November 16 2013 11:14 StorrZerg wrote: Decided to look at austinmcc filter first. I can't say i like how he has kept questioning the troll question. (and again, i'd put trolls under useless/inactive town) Other than that, i like his approach to the game, how he is asking questions. I also like how he is presenting his reads, in particular his Pandain read/thoughts. I'm happy with how he is askingg his questions in general. I would lean town on austinmcc. @austinmcc what is your read on BC? would you agree his cause to lynch trolls is not alignment specific? Regardless of that answer, if you take that out, what makes him town or scum with how he has been playing this game so far? I am FIRMLY null on Austin. Hes a slippery mudafarker and frankly I expected him to run for mayor. The concern here is that now Storrzerg has thrown out 3 town reads and delivered 2 scum reads (both of whom have come under scrutiny at different points int he game). For someone so concerned about finding scum.. why is he happy with how austin has questioned pandain? Is pandain scum... im not seeing any "hunting for scum" in storrzergs approach to this game. On November 16 2013 11:29 StorrZerg wrote: This is in essence a big fat summary post.Now lets take a better look at mattchew + Show Spoiler [case on mattchew] + I understand mattchew plays the game, by finding town and adding more town to his circle. And by that process he finds scum since they are not in his circle. How ever i am not so keen on him throwing town reads with no reason. (as he first starts out throwing one on VE) On November 15 2013 12:47 Mattchew wrote: Yam and mocsta are town but i dont agree with Mocsta's case on Storr. I saw his conclusion, read storrs filter for myself, then read his case, and reconsidered but was not swayed into putting storr anywhere but neutral. Storr is going to play different, because he comes from a different type of mafia. Mocsta sometimes equivocates different to scum again Yam, random town read no real reason. I can "assume" he is getting a town read from mocsta because he believes mocsta is scum hunting. I shouldn't assume however.. I'd prefer matt to explain in a few more words why he feels this way. He seems a bit better with how he read the situation. (since i came to a similar conclusion mocsta town, im town) He changes his read on Alakaslam because of Alakaslam post responding to yamato. again, where are the reasons? After i said i was leaning scum on mattchew, On November 16 2013 09:33 Mattchew wrote: mattchew is town i lean town on storr too His read on myself has now changed. Why? again lack of reasoning. And most recent post On November 16 2013 09:33 Mattchew wrote: BC can be lynched and im ok with that, same with koshi Not to sure why he is ok with these people, personally i am fine with a BC lynch since i feel he has not been looking for scum, just low hanging fruit. In the end, i have not found mattchew to have done anything yet in this game. His reads have had no reasoning what so ever save for 1 comment defending myself. I am putting him my scum circle for now. Matt did this, matt did that. No explanation of why it exhibits a mafia mindset. Nor does it lead to any pressure on matt to follow up with. This is feigning contribution at its absolute finest. Storrzerg has made lots of promises to find scum. However, his filter clearly demonstrates that he is playing lazy scum. - Only picks on players that have been targetted by others - Gives out several town reads with weak rationale. - Is constantly feigning contributions - Lastly, appeals to my ego by calling me town, which contradicts his mindset to analyse my further cases Storrzerg is scum. Either vote me for mayor, or lynch storrzerg as prime target. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 01:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: Most harm assasin can do is to shoot town, which screws over themselves because they lose their chance to shoot the other assasin. Therefore they do not wanna shoot town. Because they win when the other assasin dies. As far as I am concerned. Identifying assassin is only relevant to discern useless town from useless assassin. I would anticpate they play a similar game. Until we get to a point where there are nto enough creditable reads to lynch that BH becomes a priority -- there is no need to discuss assasssin tactics. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 01:28 austinmcc wrote: Cheese scummy. rayn could be, do like koshi's points, although I'm not finding rayn as scummy this game as I normally do (found him scummy in two other games in which he was town). Currently quite townie on risen, koshi. Neither has posted a particular thing that makes me super duper duper duper mega convinced they're town yet, though. Cheese is pretty detached from the game. Not just the low filter count just the posts in general. This is interesting: On November 16 2013 01:43 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: BC would you like to be mayor? Also what do you think of Skan? No follow up either of why this is important to ask either. There is potential here I think. Rayn I haven't formed an opinion of yet. Hes been kinda present but I find I know he is posting but I can't recall what its about. This assassin talk reminds me of all that too. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 01:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: I was also instructing the assasins on how to win the game because it also helps town. In case they are as dumb as that guy who said assasins will play useless. Go fuck yourself Rayn. Obviously you found all the scum since you are hunting assassins. So share.. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 01:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: I have no idea what's wrong in my scumreads in genaral, because noone has pointed it out. If you don't believe tham fine, keep on lynching townies then. Not my problem if people can't read because nobody even understood my case on HF while it's pretty clear. My read on him is not based on what he says but how he says stuff. He's like.. not happy(?) in this game and town!Koshi is happy. idk what to think of him because at the end of D1 he was showing some of his normal town tells. But anyways i can't read him if he keeps calling me scum for nothing, so i don't even try. Hoep he does something else though as now he's wasting the game on uselessness. From memory: the Koshi case involved his expectation of a town rayn to campaign a case until town accept it - at all costs. I agree this didn't occur. Your statement above also corroborates that. i think the point is valid. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 01:37 raynpelikoneet wrote: idk where did you get the idea that i am hunting assasins because if i remember correctly you had an maybe assasin read on BH.. Because you won't stop talking about whats in their best interests. Maybe hunting assassins wasnt the best choice of words. Too tired right now to be fully coherent anyways. Night. Will have to build this Grack case tomorrow. *sigh* | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 01:47 Spaghetticus wrote: Hmmm... I'm gonna go play some lol and mebe do me some personal HW. I was feeling really enthusiastic, but I haven't gained traction and while now I'm better read, I haven't really found anything that's given me real insight. I'll F5 the thread whenever I ADHD, so feel free to leave questions. Mocsta how do you function at work when you go to bed so late? Last post. I actaully play the majority of my mafia @ work lol. Im only been playing late the past couple days cos I been flat out on the weekend with real life. Good luck with ya studying, peace out. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 18 2013 01:42 raynpelikoneet wrote: Then lynch me. idgaf. Just saw this. KK. now last post. Don't like this from you Rayn. Night. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Things I want to say before deadline. (1) Artanis: You are tunneled. Your issues with me are because I do not play the game the same way you choose to. That is not an indicator of scum. Everyone that has played with me many times realises this is how I play town. Further, all your reads on other players hinge upon their thought process on me. You should know association reads are terribad. You are obsessed beyond reason. Unfortunately, the way you walk people through your mindset makes me lean town. You need to drop this; or if you can't, fine -- Accept there are other players in the game that *must* be scum and look there. (2) Spag: You need to sleep more. Your argument agianst me is that I played 3-4 games with you and should know you best, hence, should understand how you play as town/scum. Yet, neither of us call recall the specific details of these games. Fact: I have an opinion on my expectations for your play; however, I don't think for one second this is gospel. Its been 10-11months since we played together and this is your first game back. If you want to know what I remember from the game we played together: Kush and his buddy got modkilled 1/2way through Day1 and I was left by myself in my first scum game ever. You came in as a replacement and hammed up your play style intentionally. Every decision was premeditated. Thus, I questioned your actions with VE. My qualms were specifically as I had outlined. No more no less. (3) Grack: Is still scum. Im pretty disappointed my gracktease got shut down yesterday - however, I suppose it needs the support of the case to be more convincing to all. I am not expecting to die, but on the off-chance something did happen. Please read his filter this game, and compare to Hogwarts. I find the play worlds apart. In Hogwarts Grack was useless and not confident in his assessments. Here, Grack is still useless but his delurks are opportunistic and he is constantly jutting in with opinions but no justifications/evolutions. (4) Storrzerg: I only had 1 bullet so may as well claim. I vigg'd him. You can thank me Day2. I'm under the pump already at work, so will prob unveil the Grack case tonight (say 12hrs from now) | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
![]() | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
![]() | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
It's funny Ppl thought I could be scum for something so dumb, yet we're simultaneously considering storr as scum for the points I raised. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On December 08 2013 18:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: So i made a case on scum first thing in thread and get called scum for it. So usual. Epic bus on Grackaroni, lol, didn't see that. ^^ lol I didn't see it coming my way either its funny seeing scum making genuine cases on scum. and people calling the case bullshit lol I wanted grack lynched. not sure BC decided to join that party at first.but it worked in the end. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
that mayor campaign was bad lol | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
great thoughts and I agree with many. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On December 09 2013 04:45 VayneAuthority wrote: if anything it worked out to your advantage because legitimate anger at a teammate is hard to fake, so I didn't realize grackaroni was mafia until I was dead. A disfunct mafia team can be used to your advantage when you guys were mad at eachother as early as day 1, which is where I would find most of the alignments in the game at a later time Amen Shame this is true. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On December 09 2013 08:08 Grackaroni wrote: Lol I'm sorry Mocsta. I had no idea SS would consider listening to me. Its OK. Like VA said above, a truly dysfunctional scum team is so hard to fake and so rare, that it was completely viable in this situation lol. + I consider that I only died because of the big shot, as in, I had very slim chance of being lynched D2. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On December 09 2013 09:56 StorrZerg wrote: ggs ![]() So close to riding you to town cred hahha. At least you burned a scum KP which is nice ![]() | ||
| ||