|
On November 18 2013 07:53 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2013 07:47 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On November 18 2013 07:44 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 18 2013 07:40 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On November 18 2013 07:37 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 18 2013 07:34 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On November 18 2013 07:32 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 18 2013 07:29 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On November 18 2013 07:28 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: I'd like to lynch mattchew tomorrow. All the 'im town bitch' stuff feels fake as shit. 'are you kidding me ve' also fake.
In addition he not do shiiiiiit entire daaaaaaay. Well, that's kinda ironic. irrelavent. Are you planning on playing at any point or can we stop holding our breath? I expected this. Don't attack the player, logical fallacy. Attack my arguement. I think mattchew is scum for being fake. I wasn't attacking you in an attempt to weaken your initial argument. I was asking you a question regarding what we can expect of you in the coming days. Well in the way you were posting it certainly suggested that. You just said that my post was ironic because i lurk. That was not an attempt to extract information regarding my activity later, it was simply a snide comment for either weakening my arguement or for the lulz. Either way, irrelevant and not helpful Anyway, probably a lot more lurking. The initial comment was a snide remark because I'm not a big fan of people using arguments that could be used just as well against them, as it showcases how little they care about the game. The following posts were actually about getting some information regarding your future activity. Do you have any reads other than mattchew for us? Your failure to make a remark on mattchew is what i fknd interestingm I bring up mattchew as possiblescum, we bounce ideas if you are town that cares. Going 'you arent active either' isnt helping anyone because im active RIGHT NOW and want to talk about it. other reads? In due time. maybe Being frustrated with someone that isn't playing the game and that person making a case on someone else for not playing the game as one of his main arguments can cause someone that does play the game to react in a frustrated way rather than a constructive way.
As for Matt, I wouldn't be opposed to a Matt lynch. He doesn't justify any of his reads and doesn't bring anything new to the table, but it feels like a gamble.
|
Why am I not in any list? I feel left out
|
|
|
I TOLD YOU GUYS I TOLD YOU GUYS ABOUT MOCSTA
|
On November 18 2013 10:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: Blazinghand you look really good now. :D I look best, bish please
|
I can get on board for a BH train. Choo choooo
|
Mig and BC, I'd like your updated reads on one another. From what I know BC hasn't commented on Mig, and Mig was nullish on BC.
|
I can't help but notice that two of the three scumshots were people critical of VE (Yamato, Spaghetticus). StorrZerg doesn't count since it was the only shot Mocsta could make if he wanted to claim, and even he wasn't positive about VE. I'm not sure if it's a set up or if we should be looking into our mayor with a lot more scrutiny than before.
|
On November 18 2013 20:49 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think both Blazinghand and Bloodycobbler are scum. Explanation in a bit when i have a nice cup of coffee in front of me. BC has been on my radar for some time now. I'm looking forward to your explanation.
On November 18 2013 20:54 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2013 20:23 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I can't help but notice that two of the three scumshots were people critical of VE (Yamato, Spaghetticus). StorrZerg doesn't count since it was the only shot Mocsta could make if he wanted to claim, and even he wasn't positive about VE. I'm not sure if it's a set up or if we should be looking into our mayor with a lot more scrutiny than before. I could perhaps buy yamato and Spaghetticus being shot because they looked extremely towny, but why was Sharrant shot? I don't think scum would shoot Spaghetti just because he looks towny. He was either shot to discredit VE or because he was critical of VE. As for Sharrant, that's probably a bluesnipe. Sharrant was very much in the background, and his only real accusation was on Rayn whom I have a solid town read on.
|
Actually Sharrant later changed his opinions on Rayn to town and then to slight scum again. His parting suspicions were on Hopeless and BH.
|
On November 18 2013 21:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: Sharrant was shot because he was obviously blue if he wasn't scum. That dude is the worst guy on this planet to hide his blueness.
Now the BH & BC thing.
|
VE attacking Sharrant makes me more comfortable on VE's towniness. Rayn, do you agree?
|
Do you believe that scum is really putting all their cards on lynching Grackaroni that they're all coming out of the woodworks and oging all in on it? It seems like such a bad idea that I find it hard to see a team with BC in it act that clueless.
|
On November 18 2013 21:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: Also riddle me this. Why would scum not shoot into them (BH/BC) if they were town? They have no reason to expect BH is not a tracker. They have every reason to expect yamato is docced over BC. Fuck they did not even roleblock BH. Supersoft did instruct docs to heal BC and not yamato. I think it's fair to presume a scumteam would expect ss's authority to work here. Not shooting BH makes little sense though and I'm happy to lynch him. Though I'm suspicious of BC myself your case hasn't really swayed me. I find his initial comeback where he makes a big case with little content on Grack more damning. Now that I think back, I also remember that Mocsta said he thought he started the case on Grack, where BC actually did so. Could this be an unintentional miscommunication in the scum QT in that they devised a strategy to get Grack mislynched? Might be too farfetched, but I dunno.
|
Rayn, I remember you voicing suspicions on supersoft and austin in the past. Do you still have those?
|
On November 18 2013 22:26 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2013 22:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On November 18 2013 22:23 Koshi wrote: The thing I don't like about BC being scum for pushing Grack as scum agenda is that it is unlikely he is so silly to do it after thread sentiment is going in favor of Grack vs BH/Mocsta.
Would be too easy that both BH and BC are scum. Kinda would prefer it if Grack is scum.
Also, the things BC said make sense if they are correct. Koshi this is really bad. Of course everything one says makes sense if they are correct. What the hell is this? I mean the meta search he did. About Mocsta not talking about his teammates. That stuff. His scumteam could know that and have mentioned it in the scum QT though. It's a nice point to bring up afterwards.
|
Koshi I remember you had a supersoft scumread earlier, did that change and why?
|
On November 18 2013 22:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why is it so hard for everyone to tell what they think about this whole mess? Everyone is just waffling around saying noting and reaching into no conclusion. I suggest town players start to come up with what they think about the situation because scum sure as hell are confused with Mocsta dead. I want BH dead for being useless and making silly claims. I want The Cobbler dead because he made bad cases and Mocsta jumping to his defense feels iffy. I hope that makes things clear.
|
On November 18 2013 22:54 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2013 22:33 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Koshi I remember you had a supersoft scumread earlier, did that change and why? Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 09:57 supersoft wrote: okay i guess I'd kill mocsta. I believe he's scum. I am rereading him again. This was right before supersoft might have been mayor. Pretty sure supersoft confirmed town or he knew VE was around to kill Skanjab. So let's say supersoft close to confirmed town. Good point, agreed. I'm gonna meta the fuck out of marv right now because I believe at least one of the supervets has to be scum. Marv is known for balancing his setups and doesn't believe in RNG. Therefore I find it likely that given ss is pretty town, it has to be between VE/the Cobbler/Mig. This is another reason why I'd like to see the Cobbler hang. Also because I like saying the Cobbler, and this gives me plenty of opportunities for that.
|
|
|
|