[Sum of my interactions with gumshoe up through his conceding to my explanations against his accusations]
On November 05 2013 17:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
gumshoe's contributions in Basterd have a clear point, are transparent and every time they reach to a hard conclusion. None of those things happen in this game and half of his filter anyways is useless because it's about fake case that either serves no purpose if he is town or he just fucked up and is making stuff up if he is scum.
hzflank goes unphased as he becomes the primary "placeholder" candidate and explains why WoS isn't set on lynching him. Vague finger-pointing at various people including:
On November 06 2013 06:43 hzflank wrote:
Then you have people like OO who apparently think that ET is scum but is voting Sn0 for an old reason that never had much behind it. Or you have someone like Onegu who is martyring. And somehow my lynch is better than theirs. Now, I have no done much this game but I have made a few good points. I fail to see how my lynch is the best lynch and if it is going through so easily then you would expect that scum are happy with it, or that it is somehow scum motivated.
The Rektoning Begins - gumshoe appears with a few words and a vote plus a youtube video I'm not going to watch.
First Vote - Thrawn - the situation suddenly becomes hzflank versus gumshoe.
Rayn's flippant comment regarding the why is the catalyst for the incident. No reasoning given with the vote. No prior vote on gumshoe.
Umasi indicated willing to switch - the situation has come down to "who is the easiest to get lynched" at this point instead of "who is scum".
Gumshoe claims he's been around working on something but not posting. - The thought that should be going through people's minds is why would scum admit anything of the sort?
Yadda yadda bunch more votes; you know how to read a vote count.
EPT
