EPTHogwarts Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On October 18 2013 11:03 EchelonTee wrote: Why has no one commented on my Onegu case? He's gone completely black since posting 3 weakass posts and hasn't even responded to me. Screams scum much more than anyone else at this point; putting my vote on him. Will make deeper analysis when I'm back. ##Vote: Onegu this is what i thought.. but then i read his game in aperture (town) and his game in desert (scum) and he plays almost invertedly | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On October 18 2013 12:15 Pandain wrote: Mattchew: 1. When do you plan to start contributing more? 2. What differentiates your town play from scum play? 3. Who are your town reads? 4. Is there anyone you find suspicious now, even if you're not sure. You stated that Mocsta would've made the "correct" play to claim SAM as town, but then you ask if it's policy to lynch any such SAMS indicating a desire to or at least acceptance of. What would be your stance on the issue. 1. idk 2. idk 3. stutters holyflare and grack, yam syllo pandain and LA look pretty town from the limited amount i've read from them too onegu i just explained i had the same thought process as grack (i think it was grack) regarding palmar but I think he has said before himself that he's not a fast starter especially on day 1, and for him to be calling for a policy lynch and calling things as he sees them makes me not want to lynch him day 1 i dont think i'll be able to read raykoshi this game cause im pretty sure i can't read either of them anyway, HF says he can read rayn though so i'll look for that 4. i dont have any slytherin on my town list so that could be a place i would want to start lynching into ET scares me but for no reason belonging to this game has tunk posted in the QT JAT has posted basically nothing so if anyone wants to not lynch, has be posted anything in the QT? | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On October 18 2013 12:15 Pandain wrote: You stated that Mocsta would've made the "correct" play to claim SAM as town, but then you ask if it's policy to lynch any such SAMS indicating a desire to or at least acceptance of. What would be your stance on the issue. i answered this and you are skewing my order. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On October 18 2013 13:06 Pandain wrote: Do you mean this? What I get from this is that you don't see the connection. If it was correct in your opinion to claim SAM as town, then why would you ask if its standard policy to lynch him if Mocsta made a possible town move. yes. i was asking if it was standard policy to lynch a claimed miller. I also said that if you are town and a miller, it is the right thing to do to claim as I read that on mafiascum wiki. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On October 18 2013 13:25 Holyflare wrote: Mattchew, you say stutters is a townread for you? He's posted almost nothing. What makes you say towny? he stood up for palmar when he was an easy target with what i think is decent reasoning | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
You are right though, i wanted to differentiate between smart and correct, that is because i was reading mafiascum wiki Also, i asked a question about if the correct play was to auto lynch a claimed miller... For you, pandain and any other (redacted named calling) saying that i said to actually do it, please stop skewing what i said, it is quite frustrating | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On October 18 2013 14:03 Mocsta wrote: Okie Dokie. So you respond on one item; why abstain on the other(s). Cause i have no idea what to say? I buddied yam's thought processed and expressed that in the thread. Yes | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On October 18 2013 14:04 Mocsta wrote: MattChew, while you are at it. Will you lynch Zaragon? Why/Why Not? Thats bh right? I wouldnt care either way if he died... Plus hes syltherin right? | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Onegu, Syllo LastArgument Tunkeg Supersoft Yamato huffle: StorrZerg, Palmar Mattchew HolyFlare Hopeless Grack slytherin: Mocsta, EchelonTee blazinghand I-Be-Pro sn0_man skanjabs1s Gryff: Cephiro Pandain VayneAuthority raynpelikonoshi Stutters695 justanothertownie for those who haven't read and i have no read on zara/bh but if BH doesnt want to post then he can die | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On October 18 2013 18:36 LastArgument wrote: This is not a great post. The reasoning was meh, because either mafia or town Palmar could make exactly the same posts as Palmar made. Irrationally defending someone who doesn't deserve to be defended isn't a towntell. He was trying to tell the thread something he believes he knows, trying to enhance someones read on him which i think is pretty fucking towny | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
In an attempt to answer your question i think i found my first scum read, storrzerg. I'm phone posting so this case will not be well formated nor long winded Storr has focused on sn0 since his very first post which was more of a joke then anything Storr has be consistently seeking approval of our qt before posting here, this is probably to make sure that other townies agree with him Palmar very early said he liked storr's idea to kill sn0, this is what really set off the influx of storr's push on sn0 Storr's case on sn0 is bad, like forced bad. It only brings up one game related post, which is a setup post by sn0 that concludes scum may want to have a hand in who wins the challenges. This is a reasonable point Storr has continued to push this case on sn0 despite its holes and seems to ignore a lot of other happenings in the thread... I think this is to look like a tunnelling townie Storr has said in this thread and multiple times in the qt that hufflepuff produce the least dark wizards Storr is scum ##vote storrzerg | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On October 18 2013 21:10 LastArgument wrote: Matt, can you explain to me why any of the points in your case can't be applied to a new town player? I dont know how to answer this question | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On October 18 2013 21:17 LastArgument wrote: Well, it's one you need to find a way to answer if you want anyone to be convinced of your case. Couldnt you literally say this about any case against a new player | ||
| ||
