World Heavyweight Championship mafia - Page 38

On October 10 2013 01:48 Risen wrote:
I'm like... 99% sure marv is scum HF. So if Dirk is lynched today, who will you lynch tomorrow? Me, right?

On October 10 2013 01:49 Risen wrote:
Wouldn't that be the obvious thing to do?


You did it. In spite of BH warning everyone and everyone going down with your name on their lips you've managed to win it. Congratulations marv.

On October 10 2013 01:57 Risen wrote:
EBWOP: And no one bats an eye at how fast that happened. No one bats an eye at how marv was prepared for this. Of course they won't, you've been scummy all game mislynching, shitflinging, that's not town marv, but you've managed to paint thew picture that it is. I'm not even mad at this point. You took the wind out of my sails when you said I bet Risen is mad, because I realized damn, he got me pegged. He managed to play us all like puppets the entire game. He managed to play scummy and flood the thread and be wrong where he shouldn't have been wrong the entire time and we just ate it up.

On October 10 2013 02:02 Risen wrote:
You simply call people bad marv, and that's not what you've done here. You've made me FEEL bad. That's not what you do. You don't demoralize people

On October 10 2013 02:02 Risen wrote:
It all makes sense now, he knew I would immediately move over to Dirk, bcause I don't do meta, I play with logic, and logically Dirk was the guy. He was counting on it. But he wasn't counting on me to think on the next level of the Oats kill. He was expecting me to be mad, he wasn't expecting me to keep my cool. Oats went down because I'm not the crazy one, Oats is the crazy one and marv knew it. So marv got rid of the crazy guy who would lynch him for the hell of it

On October 10 2013 02:06 Risen wrote:

Because meta is not something you don't use marv. I don't mean meta is bad when I say don't use meta in cases. Meta is bad in cases because other people should keep meta in their heads. If you share meta as a thought process and then use things to back it up that's ok. That's not what anyone ever does, though. They put meta as a central point of their argument, when really it's just a support point that led you to view the person as scum in the first place. It's what confirms initially and makes you look at the person. Then you find the things in that person's filter that are scummy